JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, January 23, 2025

Political Godfather

by

20100228

The bomb­shell from UNC Chief Whip Jack Warn­er that there is a church be­ing built in the Heights of Gua­napo, in Ari­ma, with the ac­tive sup­port and in­volve­ment of PM Man­ning, ought not to have ex­plod­ed, but it has. Man­ning's in­ept han­dling of the is­sue has opened up a can of worms that has served to ex­pose the syco­phan­tic re­la­tion­ship that ex­ists in Cab­i­net. Our ca­lyp­so­ni­ans must be glee­ful­ly work­ing on next year's com­po­si­tions al­ready. PNM par­ty chair­man Con­rad Enill said there was noth­ing wrong in some ob­scure–and as yet un­known en­ti­ty–hir­ing Shang­hai Con­struc­tion Co, brought here by the state, as part of a gov­ern­ment-to-gov­ern­ment arrange­ment, on a pri­vate project. Who ap­plied for the ex­ten­sion of these work­ers' work per­mits? What was the rea­son giv­en?

Who ap­proved it? Has OS­HA been in­formed, so that the work­ers are not ex­ploit­ed? Mr Enill cit­ed no ex­am­ples to sup­port his idle boast that it was not un­com­mon for Asian com­pa­nies to stay on in Trinidad and use it as its head­quar­ters for Latin Amer­i­ca, but there are dozens of Chi­nese restau­rants that have sprung up in every nook and cran­ny of T&T with "con­struc­tion work­ers" whose work per­mits au­tho­rise them to re­main and work here on spe­cif­ic gov­ern­ment projects.

Sky­scrap­ers re­main emp­ty

I don't see any new cor­po­rate head­quar­ters for these com­pa­nies, and the wa­ter­front sky­scrap­ers re­main emp­ty. The dusty road lead­ing to the con­struc­tion site has sud­den­ly been paved at a cost of over $3 mil­lion. Con­struc­tion con­tin­ues apace, de­spite the lack of ap­provals. The church was con­cep­tu­alised in 2005, and or­ders were al­leged­ly giv­en to Calder Hart's Ude­cott to "ex­e­cute de­sign and en­gi­neer­ing" by the Prime Min­is­ter him­self. Ude­cott has de­nied this. It seems as if Man­ning is the po­lit­i­cal god­fa­ther of this new church, and who vex, vex! Man­ning's per­son­al vis­its were, no doubt, meant to cre­ate a pow­er­ful shield over this project by per­son­al as­so­ci­a­tion. Eye­brows rose when Man­ning es­tab­lished the short-lived Min­istry of Ec­cle­si­as­ti­cal Af­fairs.

The PM's band, Di­vine Echoes, re­ceives some mil­lions in grants an­nu­al­ly, cur­rent­ly ex­ceed­ing a to­tal of $10m. This band is, in sub­stance and ef­fect, an Afro-Chris­t­ian band. What if oth­er PMs fol­low suit? Man­ning's mis­han­dling of this is­sue has the po­ten­tial to up­set the del­i­cate bal­ance that has been struck be­tween the State and the Church since in­de­pen­dence. The dis­crim­i­na­tion suf­fered by the Ma­ha Sab­ha in the ra­dio li­cence case is not some­thing that should be for­got­ten, as the Privy Coun­cil crit­i­cised the Gov­ern­ment for twice mis­lead­ing the courts, in an at­tempt to con­ceal the dis­crim­i­na­tion. There is a ru­mour that the gov­ern­ment is in­di­rect­ly sup­port­ing con­struc­tion of this church, via do­na­tions from state en­ter­pris­es.

I would have dis­missed this, but on­ly last week Sen­a­tor Wade Mark crit­i­cised state-owned Petrotrin for its re­li­gious do­na­tions. He cit­ed Petrotrin's gen­er­ous do­na­tions of $1.3 mil­lion to St Pe­ter's RC and An­gli­can Church­es and an­nu­al do­na­tions of up to $500,000 to the Small En­ter­prise and Busi­ness As­so­ci­a­tion (SE­BA). Has Petrotrin ever made such a sub­stan­tial do­na­tion to any oth­er re­li­gious group?

While Mr Man­ning's of­fice has re­leased a state­ment deny­ing that he owns the church, no in­for­ma­tion has been giv­en about his in­volve­ment. Own­er­ship of the church was not even ques­tioned. This is wor­ry­ing. The Rev Ju­liana Pe­na has been ex­posed as the PM's "see-er-woman,"

Diplo­mat­ic cour­te­sies?

She is ac­cord­ed diplo­mat­ic cour­te­sies and trav­els at tax­pay­ers' ex­pense with the Prime Min­is­ter. The Zim­bab­we Her­ald, dat­ed Ju­ly 22, 2005, stat­ed: "Pres­i­dent Mu­gabe yes­ter­day met a spe­cial en­voy of the Prime Min­is­ter of Trinidad and To­ba­go, PM Patrick Man­ning, at State House. "Speak­ing af­ter the meet­ing, Rev Ju­liana Pe­na, of the Light­house of the Lord Je­sus Church, said she had come to Zim­bab­we to share with the Pres­i­dent a vi­sion that she had re­ceived from God, in which he re­vealed his de­sire to see change in Africa." Does the good Rev­erend ad­vise the PM on mat­ters of State? What mat­ters of de­ci­sion-mak­ing are del­e­gat­ed to her? What are her qual­i­fi­ca­tions to do this? What is the ex­tent of her ad­vice?

How much in­flu­ence has she on the Prime Min­is­ter? It re­al­ly makes no sense to ask these le­git­i­mate ques­tions, though. Hous­ing Min­is­ter Dr Emi­ly Gaynor Dick-Forde per­son­i­fied and em­bod­ied the at­ti­tude of the Gov­ern­ment when she said: "No. Well, I do not even know what the con­tro­ver­sy is. I do not know what the con­tro­ver­sy is. Ent the Prime Min­is­ter has said that he is a Chris­t­ian? What is the prob­lem?"

Nuff said; just shut up and let the man build his church with our mon­ey.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored