JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, April 3, 2025

Bill passed after heated debate

by

20140829

The con­tro­ver­sial Con­sti­tu­tion (Amend­ment) Bill 2014 was passed in the Sen­ate last night with the sup­port of In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tors Dhanayshar Ma­habir, Rolph Bal­go­b­in and David Small.

Af­ter al­most three days of heat­ed de­bate, the bill was passed at 11.09 pm with a to­tal of 18 sen­a­tors vot­ing for it and 12 against it. All the Op­po­si­tion Sen­a­tors present and six in­de­pen­dents vot­ed against the bill.How­ev­er, the bill re­ceived the three In­de­pen­dents' votes on­ly af­ter Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar agreed to ac­cept an amend­ment to the con­tro­ver­sial runoff clause put for­ward by Ma­habir.

Ma­habir pro­posed that a third place can­di­date in an elec­tion, who gains 25 per cent of the votes and who is with­in a mar­gin of not less than five per­cent­age points of the sec­ond place can­di­date, al­so be al­lowed to con­test the runoff elec­tion.He said this triage sys­tem will give all par­ties a fair­er chance in an elec­tion and al­low the third par­ties a chance.

Ini­tial­ly, the Gov­ern­ment had pro­posed that on­ly the top two can­di­dates would con­test the runoff if nei­ther of them gained at least 50 per cent of the votes. But many ar­gued that this would kill off third par­ties.

As it turns out, how­ev­er, in the runoff elec­tion as pro­posed by Ma­habir, the Gov­ern­ment al­so agreed to waive the 50 per cent win­ning mar­gin for the three can­di­dates. This means the win­ner of the runoff could win the seat with­out gain­ing at least 50 per cent or more of the votes. Per­sad-Bisses­sar al­so ac­cept­ed Bal­go­b­in's pro­pos­al to re­call a non-per­form­ing MP af­ter two and a half years in­stead of three.The PM al­so ac­cept­ed an amend­ment pro­posed by Small that peo­ple wish­ing to re­call MPs must get the sup­port of 20 per cent of the vot­ers in a con­stituen­cy to ap­ply for a pe­ti­tion. The orig­i­nal clause had a 10 per cent thresh­old.

Small, sup­port­ed by his col­leagues, said this would avoid mis­chief.There was heat­ed de­bate on the con­tro­ver­sial bill dur­ing the com­mit­tee stage, af­ter all the re­main­ing Sen­a­tors had ear­li­er made their con­tri­bu­tions.Dur­ing dis­cus­sions in the com­mit­tee stage, PNM sen­a­tors main­tained a non-sup­port­ive stance, ex­press­ing their com­plete re­jec­tion of the bill be­cause of the fact that there was no con­sul­ta­tion on the runoff as­pect. Dur­ing the re­call amend­ment dis­cus­sion, PNM Sen­a­tor Faris Al-Rawi want­ed to know where the 20 per cent fig­ure came from and what did the con­sul­ta­tions say about it.Small replied that he didn't just pluck the 20 per cent out of the air. He said af­ter dis­cus­sions with an in­ter­na­tion­al re­call ex­pert, he con­clud­ed that 20 per cent, which could mean 5,000 or 6,000 vot­ers in T&T, was rea­son­able.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored