Over the past 13 years the number of crimes in Venezuela has grown at an astounding rate, making the Bolivarian Republic one of the most violent and dangerous places in the world. The US State Department and Venezuela's interior minister estimate that murders occur at a rate of approximately 65 per 100,000 people, while some independent calculations suggest that the figure actually approaches 70. Venezuela now claims the unfortunate distinction of having the third-highest murder rate in the Americas, following Honduras and El Salvador. Just within the past year, according to Interior Minister Tareck el Aissami, the number of homicides increased from 14,500 to almost 19,000. Firearms constitute the weapon of choice in about 90 per cent of the murders, a figure suggestive of both the illegal proliferation of firearms and the culture of violence that has developed. The Economist reports that Venezuela's kidnapping rates surpass both Mexico and Colombia with over 3,000 incidents each year. This statistic, though, likely does not reflect the reality of the situation, as many homicides and kidnappings are never reported. Venezuelan authorities struggle to control the violence, largely centred in the nation's capital and on the Colombian border, while many government officials have engaged in criminal activities.
Effects of the violence
As a result of the alarmingly high number of homicides, Venezuela has fallen into what the United Nations calls the "violence trap," evidenced by public loss of trust in state police forces, proliferation of private security, and an overwhelmed and inefficient judicial system. An extraordinary murder rate of 108 per 100,000 has rendered Caracas, the nation's capital, an extremely violent and dangerous city. As a result of the widespread perception of citizen insecurity, the private-security industry has exploded as Venezuelans increasingly take personal safety into their own hands. Correspondingly, gun sales have grown exponentially over the past several years. The constant threat of violence is taking a devastating toll on civil society. Venezuelans have lost public space in which they can debate, express concerns, or even gather recreationally. In poorer neighbourhoods, where most of the violence occurs, the problem becomes self-perpetuating. As crime occurs, ill-equipped Venezuelan security forces respond, leading to more clashes. Over time, the government inevitably loses control and criminals face no liability for their actions. Libertador, a municipality within the capital presents a perfect example of this tragic phenomenon. The number of homicides in Libertador, the most violent area of Caracas, jumped by 64 per cent in just a year, closing out 2011 with a rate of 133 homicides for every 100,000 inhabitants. Insight Crime reports that Enero 23, one of Libertador's most violent neighbourhoods, in effect has become a "micro-state," run by about 300 armed paramilitaries who operate entirely outside of the government's purview.
These bands of heavily-armed men (also known as colectivos) take over impoverished neighbourhoods like Enero 23 and attack opposition groups, often with the complicity and financial support of the government. The dismal state of the Venezuelan penal systems further undermines any potential legitimacy of the police and the judicial system. The Venezuelan Observatory of Prisons (OVP), reports that over 48,600 inmates have overwhelmed the nation's prison system, which operates with a capacity of only 15,000. What results is a situation not unlike that of Enero 23. According to the State Department's Human Rights Report for 2011, the severe overcrowding has led to "harsh conditions due to poorly trained and allegedly corrupt prison staff as well as violence and alleged extortion by guards and inmates, some gang-related and fueled by trafficking in arms and drugs." The panes, or gang leaders, oversee drugs and firearms exchanges, making prisons among the most dangerous locations in the country. In 2011 alone, over 560 prisoners died as a result of unsanitary conditions, violence, and riots. The infamous Rodeo de La Planta, a conflict that started with a fight between two heavily-armed prison gangs, quickly erupted into a 27-day battle between police and the inmates of the La Planta prison last June. At one point, 4,000 members of the National Guard attempted to storm the prison, but only managed to remove about 2,500 inmates, while the remaining 2,000 locked themselves inside. In the end, 34 inmates died and 87 escaped, including one of the gang leaders and 26 of his closest followers.
Probable causes
Obviously, there is no single answer as to why crime has become so pervasive in Venezuelan society, however, one can point to a number of structural, institutional, and political sources of instability. With 93 per cent of Venezuelans living in cities and a sizable proportion of that population residing in the few largest metropolitan areas, a number of infrastructural and social problems inevitably arise, particularly in poor and overcrowded sectors. Vast differences in wealth magnify these issues and create tension. Structural analysis, however, only goes so far. As Roberto Briceño-Leon, a sociologist at the Wilson Center for International Scholars, notes, traditional economic indicators that tend to mirror crime rates do not reflect the situation in Venezuela. The country's literacy and employment rates have risen while its Gini coefficient (a common measure for income distribution) has fallen, demonstrating growing equality. Yet, in spite of these improvements, violent crime has grown exponentially in the past several years, suggesting that the roots of the problem reside elsewhere. The condition of state institutions, especially in the judicial system and the police force, tells quite a different story. Generally speaking, police salaries are small and they have limited presence in critical areas, especially those governed by the opposition party.
Moreover, unbridled corruption plagues the police and armed forces. Even the government admits that officers may commit up to one-fifth of all crimes. Unofficially, however, many sources report much higher rates. Often, these crimes go unpunished, especially when high-ranking officials are the perpetrators. Provea, an organisation dedicated to protecting human rights in Venezuela, reports that from 2010 to 2011, there were 173 deaths resulting from abuses by security forces. Very few of these instances were even reported. Inadequate staffing and funding plague the judicial system, making it difficult for prosecutors to process crimes and indict perpetrators. A shortage of judges also leads to trial delays and an overwhelmed judicial system, the ramifications of which obviously extend to the penal system.
According to testimonies given before the Inter-American Court on Human Rights, of the nearly 2,000 criminal complaints that an average prosecutor receives, 50 are investigated, 20 go to court, and two end in convictions. Operating under such constraints and pressures, the judges and prosecutors often only pursue the cases from which they can derive the most profit, leaving due process by the wayside. The violence, perhaps, also has roots in the chavista programme and reflects much of the current political zeitgeist. Violent imagery and language forms an integral part of Hugo Chávez's regime building. Chavistas, in a reflection of values, regularly portray and encourage forms of violence as an essential element of the political struggle. Even a glance at Chávez's Twitter account, which reaches over three million followers, reveals repeated use of impassioned and aggressive rhetoric. Therefore, though it does not explicitly sanction this violent culture which is hardly conducive to democracy, the Chávez administration does little to prevent it. Meanwhile, the government often refrains from enforcing stricter policing methods because active use of the police and military still carries the stigma of right-wing governments. With elections fast approaching, politics increasingly polarises the citizenry, leading to more clashes in the past year than ever before. Studies indicate that political instability has risen while rule of law, government effectiveness, voice, and accountability have decreased significantly. These indicators echo the findings of the 2011 UN global study on homicide, which states, "the biggest changes in homicide rates occur in countries with a relatively weak rule of law." The connection between chavista politics and violence becomes even more difficult to ignore considering that the largest increases in crime have occurred over the past 13 years, roughly the length of Chávez's presidency.
Corrective action
While the Chávez government has begun to publicly recognise the problem, its corrective measures have taken the form of words more often than action. Iris Varela, the head of a newly established ministry of penitentiary services, announced proposals to alleviate overcrowding and violence in prisons last year. These reforms, however, never came to full fruition. More recently, the government instituted a new round of reforms, the effectiveness of which should become clear in the next several months. These included restrictions on arms, limitations on the number available to police forces and a ban on privately-owned guns with the aim of disarming citizens. Now, only pre-approved groups can purchase firearms through the government vendor. Chávez has also made several efforts at judicial reform by adapting the Penal Processing Code to Venezuela's "current reality." His alterations, he explained, will involve the installation of various municipal tribunals. The success or failure of such amendments, of course, hinges on Chávez's health and the results of the upcoming November election.
This analysis was prepared by Sarah Slater, research associate at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs.