JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, April 7, 2025

A frightening abuse of power

The tes­ti­mo­ny in­di­cates that when Mr Duprey chose to, he clothed oth­ers with the nec­es­sary gar­ments of pow­er to do what he want­ed done and 'no damn dog bark.'

by

20110923

Busi­ness, so­ci­ety, the econ­o­my, sci­ence, and hu­man de­vel­op­ment have ad­vanced in part through the vi­sion­ary en­tre­pre­neur­ship, the spir­it of dar­ing and the will­ing­ness of dis­tin­guished in­di­vid­u­als to go where oth­ers have not gone be­fore. Un­doubt­ed­ly, hu­man so­ci­ety needs such cap­tains of in­dus­try, in­ven­tors and peo­ple who would look at so­ci­ety dif­fer­ent­ly from the rest. How­ev­er, hu­man his­to­ry has al­so shown that when in­di­vid­u­als ab­sorb to­tal pow­er to them­selves, when there are no checks and counter-bal­anc­ing forces, they be­come reck­less wield­ers of enor­mous pow­er. It is easy to cite po­lit­i­cal dic­ta­tors such as Hitler, Pol Pot, Stal­in, the Du­va­liers, the likes of Rafael Tru­jil­lo and count­less oth­ers who ab­ro­gat­ed pow­er un­to them­selves, and/or were al­lowed to do so by fa­nat­i­cal sup­port­ers. But as we have been hear­ing in sworn tes­ti­mo­ny over the last week at the com­mis­sion of en­quiry in­to the col­lapse of the CL Fi­nan­cial em­pire, in­clu­sive of the largest in­sur­ance com­pa­ny in the Eng­lish-speak­ing Caribbean, Cli­co, run­away un­bri­dled pow­er in the board­room can be as dan­ger­ous and dele­te­ri­ous to the so­ci­ety and econ­o­my.

We are sure­ly aware of the sto­ries of fi­nan­cial loss and hu­man suf­fer­ing that have re­sult­ed from the greed and reck­less fi­nan­cial ma­noeu­vring at CL Fi­nan­cial and Cli­co. Out­side of Trinidad and To­ba­go where gov­ern­ments are less able to sal­vage com­pa­nies and give sup­port to in­vestors, the suf­fer­ing must be ten times worst. From the tes­ti­mo­ny that has flowed from the for­mer group fi­nan­cial head, Michael Car­ballo, Lawrence Duprey had to­tal con­trol, did what he pleased above the protest of board di­rec­tors, and re­fused to sub­mit him­self to prop­er pro­ce­dures. More­over, the tes­ti­mo­ny in­di­cates that when Mr Duprey chose to, he clothed oth­ers with the nec­es­sary gar­ments of pow­er to do what he want­ed done and "no damn dog bark." But the al­leged ex­cess­es were not on­ly be­cause of the pow­er of the in­di­vid­ual, but ul­ti­mate­ly a re­sult of the ab­sence of a strong cor­po­rate struc­ture, ef­fec­tive pub­lic ac­count­abil­i­ty mech­a­nisms and a mod­ern leg­isla­tive frame­work which re­quired dis­clo­sures to state fi­nan­cial reg­u­la­tors.

The oth­er star­tling el­e­ment of the rev­e­la­tions from the Cli­co com­mis­sion has to do with the fi­nan­cial re­mu­ner­a­tion pack­ages of not on­ly Mr Duprey but oth­ers in the hi­er­ar­chy of the com­pa­ny who were be­ing paid salaries and in­cred­i­bly large fees. Ob­vi­ous­ly with the com­pa­nies go­ing bel­ly-up, the ad­ven­tures of the ex­ec­u­tives proved to be un­sus­tain­able and with­out the fi­nan­cial sagac­i­ty they were be­ing paid large salaries for. In the in­stance of Mr Duprey, his al­leged $90 mil­lion (US$14.2 mil­lion) pack­age was above the av­er­age US$11 mil­lion paid to ex­ec­u­tives of the largest 500 firms in the US. Amongst those firms were the ones which were crash­ing dur­ing the fi­nan­cial dis­as­ter in the US in the 2008-2010 pe­ri­od. But we should not on­ly fo­cus on the squan­der­ma­nia en­gaged in by Mr Duprey and his co­horts, but on the com­plete ne­glect and in­com­pe­tence of suc­ceed­ing gov­ern­ments to have failed to put in place a mod­ern reg­u­la­to­ry frame­work to gov­ern com­pa­nies.

It is a fright­en­ing re­al­i­ty of our po­lit­i­cal sys­tem that gov­ern­ments could ex­ist in pow­er with­out hav­ing to ac­count in a mean­ing­ful way to the pop­u­la­tion on such mat­ters. In­stead of be­ing re­quired to and judged on the ba­sis of es­tab­lish­ing such nec­es­sary fi­nan­cial struc­tures, gov­ern­ments con­tin­ue to slide past crit­i­cal ob­ser­va­tion on vi­tal mat­ters of gov­er­nance, hav­ing on­ly to ap­peal to emo­tion­al and trib­al sen­si­bil­i­ties. We have said it in this ed­i­to­r­i­al space on a num­ber of pre­vi­ous oc­ca­sions that it is scan­dalous in the ex­treme for suc­ceed­ing gov­ern­ments to have al­lowed com­pa­nies such as Cli­co and the Hin­du Cred­it Union to en­gage in draw­ing bil­lions of dol­lars from in­vestors with­out the nec­es­sary leg­is­la­tion to have them prop­er­ly ac­count for pub­lic funds.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored