JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, February 10, 2025

The silent pandemic of unsafe abortion

by

20100513

"End­ing the silent pan­dem­ic of un­safe abor­tion is an ur­gent pub­lic-health and hu­man-rights im­per­a­tive. As with oth­er more vis­i­ble glob­al-health is­sues, this scourge threat­ens women through­out the de­vel­op­ing world. Every year, about 19�20 mil­lion abor­tions are done by in­di­vid­u­als with­out the req­ui­site skills, or in en­vi­ron­ments be­low min­i­mum med­ical stan­dards, or both. Near­ly all un­safe abor­tions (97 per cent) are in de­vel­op­ing coun­tries. An es­ti­mat­ed 68,000 women die as a re­sult, and mil­lions more have com­pli­ca­tions, many per­ma­nent.

Im­por­tant caus­es of death in­clude haem­or­rhage, in­fec­tion, and poi­son­ing. Le­gal­i­sa­tion of abor­tion on re­quest is a nec­es­sary but in­suf­fi­cient step to­ward im­prov­ing women's health; in some coun­tries, such as In­dia, where abor­tion has been le­gal for decades, ac­cess to com­pe­tent care re­mains re­strict­ed be­cause of oth­er bar­ri­ers. Ac­cess to safe abor­tion im­proves women's health, and vice ver­sa, as doc­u­ment­ed in Ro­ma­nia dur­ing the regime of Pres­i­dent Nico­lae Ceaus­es­cu." –Un­safe abor­tion: the pre­ventable pan­dem­ic, a WHO Jour­nal pa­per by David A Grimes, Janie Ben­son, Susheela Singh, Mar­i­ana Romero, Bela Gana­tra, Fri­day E Okono­fua, Iqbal H Shah

Hypocrisy is not a crime. In this coun­try it's not even a shame. We are bold­faced cham­pi­ons of hypocrisy, con­demn­ing with our mouths what we live with our hearts. While in­cum­bent Min­is­ter of Works and Trans­port Colm Im­bert shouts from the hus­tings for his po­lit­i­cal op­po­nent Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar to de­clare her po­si­tion on abor­tion, women con­tin­ue to suf­fer un­nec­es­sar­i­ly be­cause of the coun­try's bar­bar­ic po­si­tion on that is­sue.

No­body said abor­tion was a sim­ple top­ic. There are many lev­els of dis­cus­sion we could en­gage in re­gard­ing this: med­ical con­cerns are para­mount but hard­ly soli­tary. As Min­is­ter Im­bert im­plied in his ad­dress on Mon­day in Princes Town, there is a moral and re­li­gious per­spec­tive that is a huge part of how many peo­ple view the top­ic. By his re­marks one can in­fer that he sees it as a moral­ly and re­li­gious­ly rep­re­hen­si­ble act to ter­mi­nate a preg­nan­cy.

I say it is moral­ly and eth­i­cal­ly rep­re­hen­si­ble to al­low un­safe abor­tion to con­tin­ue in this coun­try. Both anec­do­tal and sta­tis­ti­cal ev­i­dence in the pub­lic do­main point to a dra­mat­ic re­la­tion­ship be­tween il­le­gal­ly pro­cured abor­tions and the rate of ma­ter­nal mor­bid­i­ty and mor­tal­i­ty. Our women, re­gard­less of the law, con­tin­ue to seek and have abor­tions by any means, and they con­tin­ue to suf­fer ill ef­fects af­ter­wards. These ill ef­fects are not be­cause of the dan­ger of the pro­ce­dure it­self. A ter­mi­na­tion by a prac­tised doc­tor in a med­ical­ly safe en­vi­ron­ment is not es­pe­cial­ly dan­ger­ous. On the oth­er hand, a par­tial abor­tion in­duced by a drug tak­en out­side of med­ical su­per­vi­sion could be fa­tal. As­pire con­tin­ues to trum­pet that abor­tion is le­gal in T&T to pre­serve the life and health of the moth­er. Yet, how­ev­er loud­ly it shouts, voic­es such as the min­is­ter's drown out its words. Safe abor­tion to all in­tents and pur­pos­es re­mains il­le­gal and out of the reach of the many, many women who seek them.

The con­se­quence is women suf­fer­ing in­fec­tions and haem­or­rhag­ing, some­times with last­ing con­se­quences for their health and fer­til­i­ty, and an al­ways-high num­ber of women seek­ing hos­pi­tal­i­sa­tion and oth­er treat­ment for pro­ce­dures that were im­prop­er­ly or in­com­plete­ly done by chem­i­cal or phys­i­cal means. The WHO states in the above-men­tioned doc­u­ment that a fifth to half of women who seek un­safe abor­tion will be hos­pi­talised. Un­safe abor­tion, the doc­u­ment says, ac­counts for 17 per cent of ma­ter­nal deaths in Latin Amer­i­ca and the Caribbean. Un­safe abor­tion, in oth­er words, kills women. "In­creas­ing le­gal ac­cess to abor­tion is as­so­ci­at­ed with im­prove­ment in sex­u­al and re­pro­duc­tive health. Con­verse­ly, un­safe abor­tion and re­lat­ed mor­tal­i­ty are both high­est in coun­tries with nar­row grounds for le­gal abor­tion."

Mr Im­bert will nev­er have to choose be­tween keep­ing a ba­by and keep­ing a hus­band. He will nev­er have to choose be­tween a preg­nan­cy and his men­tal sta­bil­i­ty. He will nev­er have to face the idea of one more child in a home al­ready crowd­ed with hun­gry mouths. Even in the most ide­al sit­u­a­tion, where a woman is hap­pi­ly mar­ried, healthy and well pro­vi­sioned, some­times a preg­nan­cy is not want­ed. Women should have the right to end those preg­nan­cies. This might not be a pop­u­lar opin­ion, stat­ed so bald­ly. Even As­pire hes­i­tates to couch its ad­vo­ca­cy in such terms. But the ba­sis of that ad­vo­ca­cy is that it is the right of a woman to chose whether or not she will car­ry a preg­nan­cy to term. Moral­ists like to think of le­gal­is­ing abor­tion as some kind of flood­gates, which, if opened, would drown the coun­try in a foetal blood­bath. The truth is the op­po­site.

Le­gal­is­ing and mak­ing abor­tion avail­able in the pub­lic health sys­tem does not typ­i­cal­ly lead to a high­er rate of abor­tion, it seems. Mak­ing abor­tion le­gal, safe, and ac­ces­si­ble does not ap­pre­cia­bly in­crease de­mand. In­stead, the prin­ci­pal ef­fect is shift­ing pre­vi­ous­ly clan­des­tine, un­safe pro­ce­dures to le­gal and safe ones. Hence, gov­ern­ments need not wor­ry that the costs of mak­ing abor­tion safe will over­bur­den the health­care in­fra­struc­ture.

Coun­tries that lib­er­alised their abor­tion laws such as Bar­ba­dos, Cana­da, South Africa, Tunisia, and Turkey did not have an in­crease in abor­tion. By com­par­i­son, the Nether­lands, which has un­re­strict­ed ac­cess to free abor­tion and con­tra­cep­tion, has one of the low­est abor­tion rates in the world.

(Un­safe abor­tion: the pre­ventable pan­dem­ic)

The doc­u­ment from which I've quot­ed is not the on­ly one that ex­ists. As­pire has writ­ten some of its own, us­ing lo­cal in­for­ma­tion. I've used this one be­cause of a sen­tence in it that caught me: "The un­der­ly­ing caus­es of this glob­al pan­dem­ic are ap­a­thy and dis­dain for women; they suf­fer and die be­cause they are not val­ued." It rings a bell. Fri­day night the Prime Min­is­ter, from the hus­tings too, dis­missed "women's is­sues" and quick­ly moved on to talk­ing oil and gas. Women are not men. Oil and gas might pay the bills for now, but un­til and un­less we ad­dress the is­sue of un­safe abor­tion half our pop­u­la­tion will face an un­equal share of ne­glect.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored