JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 15, 2025

?Enough of Guanapo blame game

by

20100701

?It is most re­gret­table that sev­er­al in­sti­tu­tions of state have sat back and al­lowed the loot­ing of the con­struc­tion site for the church at Gua­napo Heights. It is well known that the Church of the Light­house of the Lord Je­sus Christ was be­ing con­struct­ed un­der high­ly con­tro­ver­sial, ques­tion­able and mys­te­ri­ous cir­cum­stances. About the ac­tu­al church lit­tle is known and the in­for­ma­tion that has been made pub­lic about it was pro­vid­ed by Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar, when she was Leader of the Op­po­si­tion and by Patrick Man­ning, when he was Prime Min­is­ter.

Mr Man­ning said in Par­lia­ment that the church was grant­ed a por­tion of state land to build a struc­ture. How­ev­er, while he ac­knowl­edged the leader of the church to be Pas­tor Ju­liana Pe­na, his spir­i­tu­al ad­vis­er, he de­nied any per­son­al in­volve­ment in the con­struc­tion and act­ed as if he knew lit­tle else. In the month since the gen­er­al elec­tion, loot­ing of the premis­es has been tak­ing place to the point where sup­port ma­te­r­i­al from the build­ing un­der con­struc­tion was re­moved by loot­ers, caus­ing two of them to come crash­ing down with part of the dome. At the same time when all of this was hap­pen­ing, the Gov­ern­ment, the po­lice, the In­tegri­ty Com­mis­sion and the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions have sat on their hands. Now, it seems, there is a wide­spread blame game tak­ing place with At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Anand Ram­lo­gan adopt­ing the pos­ture of an op­po­si­tion politi­cian and not a gov­ern­ment min­is­ter, iden­ti­fy­ing the Act­ing Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice and the In­tegri­ty Com­mis­sion as the cul­prits.

At yes­ter­day's post-Cab­i­net news con­fer­ence, Mr Ram­lo­gan went as far as say­ing that the Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter should seek an­swers from Act­ing CoP James Philbert as to why the po­lice have not act­ed and if the an­swers are not of a sat­is­fac­to­ry na­ture, then he will be shown the door even ear­li­er than was planned. The At­tor­ney Gen­er­al al­so chas­tised the In­tegri­ty Com­mis­sion for not act­ing to pro­tect the prop­er­ty at Gua­napo, not­ing that that body has been in­ves­ti­gat­ing pos­si­ble wrong­do­ing there and there­fore had a right and re­spon­si­bil­i­ty to ini­ti­ate ac­tion to pre­vent loot­ing of pos­si­ble ev­i­dence. While Mr Ram­lo­gan seeks to blame every­one else, he should al­ways re­mem­ber that he is the le­gal ad­vis­er to Cab­i­net and the per­son who the Con­sti­tu­tion holds re­spon­si­ble for the ad­min­is­tra­tion of le­gal af­fairs. The re­sponse we have had so far from the po­lice is to the ef­fect that the own­er of the prop­er­ty is not known and so the po­lice could not ad­vance on the prop­er­ty to pro­tect it.

It is al­most as if all of the ma­jor le­gal in­sti­tu­tions have be­come shack­led, un­able to act in the na­tion­al in­ter­est while crim­i­nals are mak­ing off with loot, which could emerge as be­ing state prop­er­ty, en­dan­ger­ing pub­lic safe­ty and cre­at­ing ten­sion and con­fu­sion in the na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty. Not very far from the sur­face is an ob­vi­ous po­lit­i­cal un­der­cur­rent, es­pe­cial­ly in the in­stance of Mr Ram­lo­gan tag­ging the In­tegri­ty Com­mis­sion, with which he had a spat in the mat­ter of whether Jack Warn­er could con­tin­ue in Fi­fa while be­ing a min­is­ter. The ques­tion the or­di­nary cit­i­zen must be ask­ing is why could these in­sti­tu­tions and guardians of the na­tion­al in­ter­est not come to­geth­er and work out a way of pro­ceed­ing with­out this un­seem­ly pub­lic squab­ble about who is re­spon­si­ble and who is not per­form­ing in the most ap­pro­pri­ate man­ner?

And this is more puz­zling in the con­text of the Gov­ern­ment hav­ing es­tab­lished at least three min­istries to in­ter­act with each oth­er to counter crim­i­nal ac­tiv­i­ties of one kind or the oth­er. Why did it have to come to such a hu­mil­i­at­ing con­test?� In ad­di­tion to the law-abid­ing cit­i­zen be­ing dis­mayed by it all, crim­i­nals must cer­tain­ly feel that they could ben­e­fit from space and time as of­fi­cial­dom fights each oth­er. But it is not too late for the in­sti­tu­tions to com­bine their ef­forts rather than con­test­ing with each oth­er in such a pub­lic man­ner.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored