JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, March 16, 2025

Media's role vital to democracy

by

20120924

Al­though mis­un­der­stood by many, the me­dia's role in en­sur­ing a free flow of in­for­ma­tion, ideas and opin­ions re­mains a crit­i­cal el­e­ment in main­tain­ing a healthy, ful­ly func­tion­ing democ­ra­cy. That is so even as rapid tech­no­log­i­cal and so­cial de­vel­op­ments are chang­ing how the me­dia reach the mass­es around the world. As the in­dus­try evolves be­yond tra­di­tion­al news­pa­pers, ra­dio and tele­vi­sion out­lets and now in­cludes an ar­ray of so­cial net­works ac­cessed elec­tron­i­cal­ly by an as­sort­ment of desk­top and mo­bile elec­tron­ic de­vices, one thing re­mains con­stant-the role of the news me­dia as a "watch­dog" has not changed. The prop­er de­vel­op­ment of any coun­try is not pos­si­ble with­out jour­nal­ists to ques­tion the ac­tions of gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials, con­firm the truth of what of­fi­cials tell the pub­lic and gath­er facts that cit­i­zens need to make in­formed de­ci­sions. That is ex­act­ly what hap­pened when the T&T Guardian broke the sto­ry about the Au­gust 31 procla­ma­tion of Sec­tion 34 of the Ad­min­is­tra­tion of Jus­tice (In­dictible Pro­ceed­ings) Act, alert­ing the na­tion to de­vel­op­ments which had se­ri­ous, very neg­a­tive im­pli­ca­tions for the prop­er gov­er­nance of this coun­try.

It is in­evitable that be­cause the me­dia car­ry out this very im­por­tant func­tion, their re­la­tion­ship with politi­cians is of­ten an­tag­o­nis­tic. Jour­nal­ism, when prop­er­ly prac­tised, fre­quent­ly casts an un­com­fort­able spot­light on elect­ed and se­lect­ed gov­ern­ment and op­po­si­tion of­fi­cials to en­sure that they up­hold their oaths of of­fice and car­ry out the jobs they were placed in po­lit­i­cal of­fice to do. Some politi­cians would pre­fer me­dia hous­es to be their un­of­fi­cial pub­lic-re­la­tions out­lets, churn­ing out on­ly ar­ti­cles and sound­bites that make them look good. To do so, how­ev­er, would be to un­der­mine a very vi­tal and healthy el­e­ment of T&T's democ­ra­cy. It is clear that Op­po­si­tion Leader Dr Kei­th Row­ley is among the many T&T politi­cians who do not un­der­stand the role of the me­dia. In his Re­pub­lic Day mes­sage the PNM po­lit­i­cal leader thanks the me­dia for do­ing their job, de­clar­ing that "the na­tion owes a deep debt of grat­i­tude to those vig­i­lant pro­fes­sion­als who work in the mass me­dia. These are the men and women who le­git­imise the doc­trine that the price of free­dom is eter­nal vig­i­lance." It is there­fore im­por­tant to re­mind Dr Row­ley that the T&T Guardian and oth­er oth­ers have been do­ing just that through­out suc­ces­sive gov­ern­ments in T&T-not on­ly now with the cur­rent Sec­tion 34 de­ba­cle, but through­out every so­cial and po­lit­i­cal event that has caused up­heavals in Trinidad and To­ba­go.

From what he said yes­ter­day, it is ob­vi­ous that the Op­po­si­tion Leader does not ful­ly ap­pre­ci­ate that, as he said in his nice-sound­ing speech, the "role of the mass me­dia in pro­tect­ing us cit­i­zens from the ex­cess­es and in­dis­cre­tions of un­wor­thy lead­ers is not to be un­der­val­ued." It is strange how politi­cians can on­ly see that when they are in op­po­si­tion. Two years ago, the PNM was claim­ing the PP had in­fil­trat­ed the me­dia and was or­ches­trat­ing at­tacks on the gov­ern­ment of the day-Patrick Man­ning's PNM ad­min­is­tra­tion. At that time the hot-but­ton is­sues in­clud­ed the role of the Calder Hart-led Ude­cott in sev­er­al con­tro­ver­sial mul­ti-mil­lion-dol­lar con­struc­tion projects. Now the PP is in pow­er, mak­ing the same claims as their po­lit­i­cal ri­vals did lead­ing up to the May 24, 2010, gen­er­al elec­tion. Now, un­for­tu­nate­ly, the po­lit­i­cal tac­tics have changed, for the worse.

Par­ty sup­port­ers are be­ing briefed to cir­cu­late dis­taste­ful cam­paigns via wide­ly read e-mail fo­rums on re­porters who write ex­pos­es. The in­tegri­ty, per­son­al lives and men­tal health of these jour­nal­ists are be­ing tar­get­ed and of course their mo­ti­va­tion for writ­ing sto­ries that em­bar­rass one side or the oth­er are be­ing in­cor­rect­ly por­trayed as po­lit­i­cal. This is not on­ly un­der­hand and ma­li­cious but al­so mis­guid­ed and ill-in­formed. The Guardian doesn't sim­ply take any ma­te­r­i­al a re­porter pro­duces and pub­lish it ver­ba­tim. Sto­ries aimed at ex­pos­ing wrong­do­ing must be based on ac­cu­rate re­port­ing backed with doc­u­men­ta­tion and oth­er ev­i­dence where need­ed. They must be edit­ed to en­sure they are fair and bal­anced, must al­low the sub­ject the op­por­tu­ni­ty to re­ply wher­ev­er pos­si­ble and must be in the pub­lic in­ter­est. This new­pa­per's slo­gan is "the Guardian of democ­ra­cy," and it has a rep­u­ta­tion for cred­i­ble and forth­right jour­nal­ism that it has up­held for 95 years-while politi­cians have come and gone.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored