JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, February 17, 2025

Is the latest coalition one of substance?

by

63 days ago
20241216

Frankly, it must be quite tir­ing for the na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty, even the sup­port­ers of the par­ties in­volved in the in­tend­ed coali­tion of par­ties un­der the ban­ner of the op­po­si­tion Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC), to ex­pe­ri­ence an­oth­er as­so­ci­a­tion of par­ties de­void of sub­stance.

Sure­ly, there is rea­son to dis­miss the rul­ing par­ty for its fail­ures to bring re­lief to the na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty from the dead­ly and stul­ti­fy­ing crim­i­nal­i­ty, and so too its in­abil­i­ty to cre­ate the en­vi­ron­ment for the growth of the non-en­er­gy econ­o­my. How­ev­er, it is the in­ca­pac­i­ty of the op­po­si­tion forces to present an at­trac­tive and sol­id enough pro­gramme for the elec­torate to have an al­ter­na­tive to the Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment which mys­ti­fies and dis­turbs.

With the gen­er­al elec­tion con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly due next year, Op­po­si­tion Leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar an­nounces a coali­tion with what Lloyd Best used to call a “pick-up side.” Best likened this to Sun­day morn­ing crick­et in the Queen’s’Park Sa­van­nah in the 1960s, a fore­run­ner to the ab­bre­vi­at­ed T20/T10 for­mats of the present. Then, a team short of play­ers will hail out to any passer­by and say to the ef­fect, “Come join us; how yuh does bat or bowl?” “Nei­ther,” may be the re­ply. “That’s ok, open the bat­ting for we; bowl­ing same thing.”

To­day, op­po­si­tion par­ties have con­tin­u­al­ly en­gaged in the same kind of non­sen­si­cal and non-vi­able al­liances, elec­tion af­ter elec­tion and when elect­ed to gov­ern­ment or placed on the op­po­si­tion bench­es in the Par­lia­ment, a place of great re­spon­si­bil­i­ty, they frac­ture in­to their con­stituent el­e­ments al­most be­fore they have tak­en the oath of of­fice.

If there was rhyme and rea­son for the 1986 com­ing to­geth­er un­der the ban­ner of the Na­tion­al Al­liance for Re­con­struc­tion with a group of lead­ers who could be tak­en se­ri­ous­ly, there has been the ab­sence of a ba­sis for this cur­rent coali­tion.

It must be said be­cause it is the truth, that the po­lit­i­cal leader of the UNC, Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar, who has been Op­po­si­tion Leader and prime min­is­ter in her time in pub­lic of­fice, has failed spec­tac­u­lar­ly to in­sti­tu­tion­alise and make co­he­sive with a track record of suc­cess, her par­ty and its coali­tion part­ners.

In 2010, with a group of elect­ed per­sons who on pa­per could have been reck­oned to have a mea­sure of ex­pe­ri­ence in pol­i­tics and gov­ern­ment, with­in a cou­ple months the fault lines ap­peared and the Peo­ple’s Part­ner­ship gov­ern­ment - which was for­malised un­der the Fyz­abad Ac­cord, dis­in­te­grat­ed in of­fice faster than the prover­bial “Red House Fire.”

Where’s the ide­o­log­i­cal ba­sis up­on which this “pick-up side” has been formed? What are the ob­jec­tives? More­over, un­der ex­am­i­na­tion, the par­ties to the coali­tion have lit­tle to rec­om­mend them for gov­er­nance and or op­po­si­tion. In­deed, are they tru­ly “par­ties?”

With re­spect to the trade unions, while they are solid­ly rep­re­sen­ta­tive of work­ers, their rights and as­pi­ra­tions, the unions have found it quite un­com­fort­able and ul­ti­mate­ly dis­as­trous to be in a po­lit­i­cal bed with politi­cians. Fur­ther­more, they have tra­di­tion­al­ly re­ceived lit­tle sup­port from their mem­bers, who make a dis­tinc­tion be­tween their po­lit­i­cal loy­al­ty and in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions con­cerns.

Mrs Per­sad-Bisses­sar has al­ready not­ed that this time around she has more time to work on har­mon­is­ing her new coali­tion forces. Truth be told, how­ev­er, the en­ti­ties in­volved have not yet pro­vid­ed the proof of be­ing able to cre­ate a coali­tion of sub­stance in the in­ter­est of “the peo­ple.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored