- Last update:12 hours 48 min ago
Support for UK’s proposed global forex trade tax
From left, Dr Mohan Kaul, director general and chief executive officer of the Commonwealth Business Council; Michael Mansoor, chairman, FirstCaribbean International Bank; and, Sir Allan Fields, chairman, Cable & Wireless, Barbados, at the Commonwealth Business Forum, aboard the Serenade of the Seas cruise ship, Wednesday. PHOTO: KARLA RAMOO
Commonwealth non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have lent their support for a proposal from British Prime Minister Gordon Brown for a financial transaction tax (FTT) in support of health and humanitarian projects across the globe. David Hillman, director of Stamp Out Poverty, a global humanitarian non-governmental lobby group, said the proposed tax has the potential to finance several global humanitarian funds that are struggling to reach their targets for delivering service and drugs to achieve their millennium goals.
Speaking at a press conference at the IFC Building C, at the media centre of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) yesterday, Hillman urged Commonwealth leaders to support the financial transaction tax, including a currency transaction levy for health. Hillman said the foreign exchange market amounts to trillions of US dollars daily and exacting a tax of less than half of one per cent will be unnoticed by traders, yet make a significant difference to the standard of life for disadvantaged and poor people worldwide. He said a 0.05 per cent tax could easily raise US$20 billion annually for these special projects. Other speakers included Dr John Foster of the North South Institute (Canada) and Basil Williams, director HIV and Aids Alliance Caribbean.
Tax to benefit poor
Hillman said key benefactors of the funds will be UNAids and several related funds seeking to deliver medication, food and humanitarian relief for poor and disadvantaged countries. “This is a very exciting time for us, with the breakthrough two weeks ago with the British Prime Minister and the United Kingdom government openly coming out in support of the financial transaction tax after years of extensive lobbying from civil society and NGO groups. “It has recently come to our attention that indications from Number 10 Downing Street—the Prime Minister’s Office—that they are proposing to use 50 per cent of the revenues to help pay for bank bailouts, while the other half will be split between international development funds and projects dealing with delivering healthcare and climate change. “These are extraordinary times, the issue of FTTs or a currency transaction levy (CTL)—sometimes referred in the media as a Tobin tax—was not being discussed seriously by world leaders a year ago,” Hillman said. “Due to the recent financial crisis, governments are no longer prepared to fall back to the ‘so-called’ wisdom of banks, and there seem to be an end to ‘no-go’ areas, such as taxing currency transactions.”
Fixing the financial system
Hillman said serious questions were being asked about the actions and operations of the international banking system and the attitudes of bank leaders. “The approach was that the banks could get away with this because all of society appear to benefit from their actions, and their ‘if it’s not broke, don’t fix it’ attitude— but the financial international system literally became broke, and it needs to be fixed,” he said. “This changing approach by world leaders first manifested itself in the G20 meeting when they tasked the IMF in their recent summit in Pittsburgh to explore options for the financial sector to pay for its own bail out. This opened the discussion and we are pleased that these issues are being dealt with. “Finally, this subject can now be discussed and moved on in a way not possible before,” Hillman said. “The truth is, taxing financial transactions are normal, commonplace and technically simple because the market is electronic and automated, and a simple change in computer code can set aside the funds for collection.”
Clarification please
Clarification please
Hillman said the foreign exchange market amounts to trillions of US dollars daily and exacting a tax of less than half of one per cent will be unnoticed by traders, yet make a significant difference to the standard of life for disadvantaged and poor people worldwide.
Is Mr Hillman willing to put his head on a block, that the traders will not pass this tax (even if it is "less than half of one per cent") on to their customers?
La Diva
The smarter the journalists are, the better off society is. For to a degree, people read the press to inform themselves-and the better the teacher, the better the student body. Warren Buffet
La Diva, When Gordon Brown
La Diva, When Gordon Brown was Chancellor of the Exchequer, all he did was tax, tax, tax and spend, spend, spend. Read "waste" for "spend". Now Britain is saddled with the largest debt the country has ever known. Estimated at £697.5bn, or 47.5% of GDP, by the end of 2008, now put at about £824.8 billion —equivalent to 59 per cent of the country's economic output. And in the next five years, it is expected to rise to £1.4 trillion or 80% of GDP. So it will be tax and more tax, until he chases all high income earners and all big business out of the UK. On top of that he wants to raise more taxes on the pretext that they will save the planet from green house gases. Just another ploy. And his country is still at war with Iraq and Afghanistan, so he needs more taxes for to pay for that. Brown is Britain's Manning and is doing to the British people just what Mannning is doing to Trinbagonians.
Since these traders deal in
Since these traders deal in trillions a fraction of 1% is in billions and traders being smart traders will simply trade elsewhere from the UK. Manning will be well pleased and Madame Nunez-Tesheira will be gushing. So much for trying to help poor people.
Rik Hansel
Good comments from La Diva
Good comments from La Diva and Roshan. Let me add mine.
Property tax not 'nuff? We need airtax and currency tax now? If the answer to helping the poor is through fiscal policy, God help us.
Does anyone know the implications of a currency tax on a developing economy? Just think oil/gas manufacturing only and let your imagination flow. The US is about to depend less on foreign supplies of oil and gas with the emergence of electric/battery cars etc The more you trade, the more you pay! This might bring back the 'barter' system of trade, we going back in time?
Maybe, I still suffer from the dependency syndrome, but 'developed nation' status mean to me, the ability to help 'developing nations'