JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, April 4, 2025

RIC approves $6B in questionable costs for T&TEC

by

Erik Lavoie
344 days ago
20240425

Erik Lavoie

The Reg­u­lat­ed In­dus­tries Com­mis­sion (RIC) ap­proved ex­pen­di­ture for the Trinidad and To­ba­go Elec­tric­i­ty Com­mis­sion (T&TEC) that is around $6 bil­lion high­er than his­tor­i­cal­ly jus­ti­fied be­tween 2024 and 2028. If the Cab­i­net ap­proves the fi­nal de­ter­mi­na­tion as it stands, this $6 bil­lion in ad­di­tion­al ex­pen­di­ture could be passed di­rect­ly to elec­tric­i­ty con­sumers over the next five years.

The $6 bil­lion in ques­tion­able ex­pen­di­ture is at­trib­uted to the RIC’s de­ci­sion to ap­prove a 71 per cent in­crease in T&TEC’s to­tal gen­er­a­tion costs be­tween 2021 and 2024.

The two com­po­nents of to­tal gen­er­a­tion costs, fu­el costs and con­ver­sion costs are set to in­crease by 63 per cent and 80 per cent, re­spec­tive­ly.

In 2021, the cost of fu­el to T&TEC was $1.08 bil­lion. The RIC ap­proved fu­el cost for T&TEC in 2024 of $1.75 bil­lion, which is an in­crease of 63 per cent.

T&TEC’s cost of con­ver­sion in 2021 was $983 mil­lion. The RIC ap­proved con­ver­sion cost for T&TEC in 2024 of $1.77 bil­lion. That is an in­crease of 80 per cent.

His­tor­i­cal trends in gen­er­a­tion costs and the rigid na­ture of these costs raise ques­tions about the jus­ti­fi­ca­tion of such an in­crease.

For com­par­i­son, the ac­tu­al in­crease in to­tal gen­er­a­tion costs be­tween 2012 and 2019, ac­cord­ing to T&TEC, was 5.3 per cent, an an­nu­alised in­crease of less than 1 per cent over the eight-year pe­ri­od. T&TEC’s to­tal gen­er­a­tion costs in 2012 was $1.94 bil­lion and in 2019, it was $2.05 bil­lion.

This rev­e­la­tion fol­lows an April 4, 2024 Busi­ness Guardian in­ves­ti­ga­tion, which es­ti­mat­ed a 124 per cent in­crease in elec­tric­i­ty bills for the me­di­an house­hold (470 kWh/month) by 2028, if the Gov­ern­ment im­ple­ments the fi­nal de­ter­mi­na­tion as writ­ten.

Us­ing the RIC’s pro­jec­tions for de­mand, fu­ture gen­er­a­tion costs should on­ly rise by less than 15 per cent. In this case, elec­tric­i­ty bills for the me­di­an house­hold would still go up, but on­ly by 78 per cent by 2028, com­pared to a 124 per cent in­crease un­der a 71 per cent in­crease in gen­er­a­tion costs by 2024. This would save the me­di­an house­hold ap­prox­i­mate­ly $864 an­nu­al­ly by 2028.

63% in­crease in fu­el costs?

T&TEC is re­spon­si­ble for the pur­chase of fu­el, in the form of nat­ur­al gas, to be used by the three in­de­pen­dent pow­er pro­duc­ers (IPPs): Trinidad Gen­er­a­tion Un­lim­it­ed, which is 100 per cent state owned, Pow­er­Gen, 51 per cent state owned and Trin­i­ty Pow­er, a pri­vate­ly owned com­pa­ny.

The Na­tion­al Gas Com­pa­ny (NGC) sells the fu­el to T&TEC at a sub­sidised rate that in­creas­es by 3 per cent an­nu­al­ly. The RIC has ap­proved fu­el costs for 2023-2024 that are 63 per cent high­er than T&TEC’s re­port­ed fu­el costs in 2021.

De­spite the RIC’s ap­proval for in­creased costs, T&TEC has ac­tu­al­ly re­port­ed de­clin­ing fu­el ex­pens­es since 2012, ac­cord­ing to the RIC’s fi­nal de­ter­mi­na­tion. This trend is at­trib­uted to two main fac­tors: in­creased gen­er­a­tion from pow­er plants with fu­el-ef­fi­cient com­bined cy­cle gas tur­bines (CCGT) and stag­nant elec­tric­i­ty de­mand since 2012. These el­e­ments com­bined have soft­ened the ef­fect of the an­nu­al 3 per cent es­ca­la­tion in nat­ur­al gas prices sup­plied by the NGC to T&TEC.

Con­se­quent­ly, it is un­clear what jus­ti­fies the sig­nif­i­cant surge in T&TEC’s fu­el costs.

80% in­crease in con­ver­sion costs?

T&TEC al­so pays IPPs for the con­ver­sion of the fu­el it pur­chas­es in­to elec­tric­i­ty. The RIC has ap­proved con­ver­sion costs for 2023-2024 that are 80 per cent greater than T&TEC’s con­ver­sion costs in 2021.

Over the 2012 to 2021 pe­ri­od, the av­er­age growth rate in con­ver­sion costs was 2.3 per cent an­nu­al­ly.

Ap­prox­i­mate­ly 95 per cent of T&TEC’s con­ver­sion costs orig­i­nate from ca­pac­i­ty costs, where T&TEC pays for the avail­abil­i­ty of gen­er­a­tion po­ten­tial in­stead of the ac­tu­al quan­ti­ty of elec­tric­i­ty pro­duced.

Each IPP has a for­mu­la used in cal­cu­lat­ing ca­pac­i­ty costs. The three main vari­ables in these equa­tions in­flu­enc­ing the ca­pac­i­ty cost paid by T&TEC are the Unit­ed States’ (US) Con­sumer Price In­dex (CPI) in­fla­tion rate, amount of con­tract­ed ca­pac­i­ty, and the per kW ca­pac­i­ty rate.

US CPI in­fla­tion, ac­cord­ing to the US Fed­er­al Re­serve, will range be­tween 2.0 per cent and 2.6 per cent up to 2026.

The amount of con­tract­ed ca­pac­i­ty is un­like­ly to change sig­nif­i­cant­ly, as the pro­ject­ed to­tal in­crease in elec­tric­i­ty con­sump­tion be­tween 2021 and 2024 is ex­pect­ed to be be­tween 1.5 and 3 per cent an­nu­al­ly, ac­cord­ing to the RIC.

This leaves the ca­pac­i­ty rate charged as the on­ly vari­able that could large­ly be re­spon­si­ble for the 80 per cent in­crease. T&TEC has not no­ti­fied the pub­lic of any changes to ex­ist­ing pow­er pur­chase agree­ments (PPA) be­tween it­self and the IPPs. The ear­li­est that a PPA is ex­pect­ed to con­clude is in 2029, ac­cord­ing to a joint se­lect com­mit­tee hear­ing in­to T&TEC’s man­age­ment prac­tices on May 5, 2021.

RIC’s jus­ti­fi­ca­tion of 71% in­crease to T&TEC

Guardian Me­dia con­tact­ed the RIC for the jus­ti­fi­ca­tions be­hind the 71 per cent in­crease in gen­er­a­tion costs for 2024:

The RIC was asked: “What are the jus­ti­fi­ca­tions for the 63 per cent in­crease in fu­el costs and 80 per cent in­crease in con­ver­sion costs?”

Here was the RIC’s re­sponse:

“Over the pe­ri­od 2017 to 2021, the fluc­tu­a­tions in the ac­tu­al fu­el cost and the de­clin­ing trend in the con­ver­sion cost were due to falling de­mand, this be­ing es­pe­cial­ly neg­a­tive­ly af­fect­ed dur­ing the pe­ri­od of the Covid-19 pan­dem­ic. This makes the com­par­i­son and thus dif­fer­en­tial of the cost pro­jec­tions in 2023 to the ac­tu­al costs in 2021 very large.”

At first glance, this may seem like a prop­er jus­ti­fi­ca­tion, giv­en the dis­rup­tive im­pacts of the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic.

How­ev­er, a deep­er in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to ag­gre­gate elec­tric­i­ty con­sump­tion be­tween 2021 and the RIC’s 2024 fore­cast re­veals a cru­cial prob­lem in the RIC’s ar­gu­ment:

In 2021, to­tal elec­tric­i­ty con­sump­tion in T&T was 8,268 gi­gawatt-hours (GWh). The RIC’s own fore­cast for elec­tric­i­ty con­sump­tion in 2024 is 8,805 GWh. This means that be­tween 2021 and 2024, ac­cord­ing to the RIC’s own pro­jec­tion, elec­tric­i­ty con­sump­tion will in­crease 6.5 per cent.

A 6.5 per cent in­crease in de­mand, once con­sid­er­ing in­creas­es in fu­el costs and ca­pac­i­ty costs, would cor­re­spond to an in­crease in to­tal gen­er­a­tion costs of be­tween 13 to 19 per cent, a range that is nowhere near the 71 per cent ap­proved by the RIC.

The RIC’s jus­ti­fi­ca­tion rais­es ques­tions on whether T&TEC sub­mit­ted in­flat­ed gen­er­a­tion costs that were not prop­er­ly scru­ti­nised by the RIC.

The cost to con­sumers

With a 71 per cent in­crease in gen­er­a­tion costs, the av­er­age tar­iff to be charged by T&TEC will need to in­crease by 106 per cent by 2028.

As­sum­ing an­nu­al in­creas­es of 3 per cent in fu­el costs, 2.5 per cent in US CPI in­fla­tion, and 2.5 per cent in elec­tric­i­ty de­mand, along­side a con­ser­v­a­tive 0.5 per cent an­nu­al ef­fi­cien­cy im­prove­ment rate, T&TEC would on­ly need to raise its av­er­age tar­iff by around 64 per cent. This is an av­er­age tar­iff in­crease that is 40 per cent low­er than the RIC’s ap­proved av­er­age tar­iff in­crease.

Lack of trans­paren­cy is con­cern­ing

Typ­i­cal­ly, when propos­ing a sub­stan­tial in­crease in costs from re­cent trends, reg­u­la­to­ry bod­ies ex­ten­sive­ly de­tail the rea­sons be­hind their de­ci­sions. How­ev­er, the RIC’s 2023-2028 fi­nal de­ter­mi­na­tion lacks jus­ti­fi­ca­tion from the RIC for the sub­stan­tial rise in gen­er­a­tion costs.

The fi­nal de­ter­mi­na­tion for 2023-2028 marks a de­par­ture from pre­vi­ous prac­tices like those ob­served in the 2006-2011 Fi­nal De­ter­mi­na­tion, where the RIC pro­vid­ed com­pre­hen­sive break­downs and jus­ti­fi­ca­tions for cost ad­just­ments.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored