JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, March 17, 2025

THE GREAT DEBATE

by

20130110

At the time of writ­ing, there is great an­tic­i­pa­tion for the de­bate in­volv­ing the three lead­ers of the par­ties con­test­ing the THA elec­tions. Ku­dos must be giv­en to the peo­ple re­spon­si­ble for im­ple­ment­ing this ini­tia­tive and those who have ac­tive­ly par­tic­i­pat­ed in the event.

Many were un­sure whether the de­bate would oc­cur be­cause the or­gan­i­sa­tion of such an event is no easy task. The good news is that the hur­dles were over­come so that all cit­i­zens could ben­e­fit from lis­ten­ing to or view­ing this his­toric event.

Our coun­try is ca­pa­ble of achiev­ing po­lit­i­cal ma­tu­ri­ty and this de­bate pro­vides an op­por­tu­ni­ty for the elec­torate to as­sess con­test­ing par­ties and can­di­dates based on their abil­i­ty to ad­dress the is­sues that are of na­tion­al im­por­tance.

The fact that To­ba­go is lead­ing the charge in this di­rec­tion of pos­i­tive po­lit­i­cal growth by pro­vid­ing a plat­form that will en­gage the at­ten­tion of, not on­ly the vot­ers in To­ba­go, but the en­tire pop­u­la­tion of our Re­pub­lic is of great sig­nif­i­cance be­cause for too long the con­tri­bu­tion of our sis­ter isle has been tak­en for grant­ed.

What­ev­er the out­come of the de­bate, a prece­dent has been set and it will be very dif­fi­cult for par­ties in fu­ture elec­tions, whether lo­cal or gen­er­al, not to pro­vide the cit­i­zen­ry with a sim­i­lar type of de­bate in­volv­ing the lead­ers of the re­spec­tive po­lit­i­cal en­ti­ties.

Win­ning the de­bate

This de­bate is a means to en­cour­age lead­ers to fo­cus on is­sues and not get car­ried away with po­lit­i­cal rhetoric and pro­pa­gan­da con­coct­ed sole­ly for the pur­pose of woo­ing, by mis­lead­ing, the elec­torate.

The dis­cus­sion is in a con­trolled en­vi­ron­ment so that speak­ers can­not re­ly on be­ing over­come by the mo­ment as an ex­cuse for any slips of the tongue or in­ap­pro­pri­ate re­marks.

There has been suf­fi­cient time for prepa­ra­tion by the par­tic­i­pants and all the speak­ers are vet­er­an politi­cians who are very fa­mil­iar with mat­ters af­fect­ing To­ba­go. But even the best or­a­tors need sup­port and ad­vice, so it ex­pect­ed that they have re­ceived words of wis­dom from their col­leagues to win the de­bate.

Much is rest­ing on the abil­i­ty of the de­baters to con­vince vot­ers that the par­ty they rep­re­sent will gen­uine­ly look af­ter the in­ter­ests of To­bag­o­ni­ans and we have al­ways been told that un­like Trinida­di­ans, To­bag­o­ni­ans are not gullible peo­ple.

Chain re­ac­tion

The in­ter­est gen­er­at­ed by this de­bate will un­doubt­ed­ly en­cour­age oth­er in­ter­est groups to fol­low suit and pro­vide plat­forms for peoople to en­gage in mean­ing­ful dis­cus­sion.

There are many im­por­tant mat­ters that must be placed in the pub­lic do­main in or­der to can­vass the views of those who are ex­perts in the area and to record and ad­dress the con­cerns of cit­i­zens af­fect­ed by mat­ters of pub­lic im­por­tance.

Ad­mit­ted­ly, there are many ra­dio and tele­vi­sion pro­grammes that en­able peo­ple to ex­press their views about a va­ri­ety of top­ics but, in some in­stances, de­pend­ing on the sub­ject, it is im­por­tant to have a struc­tured and com­pre­hen­sive ap­proach to ad­dress the par­tic­u­lar mat­ter.

The de­bate in To­ba­go should spark suf­fi­cient in­ter­est so that the ques­tion be­comes: when is our next de­bate and what is the top­ic?

We are a coun­try of talk­ers and it is time for us to con­vert the ole talk in­to mean­ing­ful de­bate so that peo­ple could form opin­ions based on plat­forms of knowl­edge.

Re­al win­ners

We all have every­thing to gain and noth­ing to lose by in­sist­ing that those who want our votes must sub­ject them­selves to pub­lic as­sess­ment on neu­tral turf.

It is one thing to speak glibly on a po­lit­i­cal plat­form to thou­sands of par­ty loy­al­ists wav­ing flags and ban­ners in en­er­gised sup­port but it is quite dif­fer­ent when the at­mos­phere is sober and in­tense.

De­baters do not have the ben­e­fit of dis­trac­tion or the abil­i­ty to call for back-up when in ver­bal dif­fi­cul­ty, so that the pres­sure is al­ways on to per­form at one's best.

The de­bate is not on­ly about the speak­er, but the team he or she rep­re­sents. In this case, fail­ure by any de­bater to per­form at a high lev­el could be viewed as an in­dict­ment against the en­tire par­ty he rep­re­sents.

There is no room for er­ror by any of the play­ers and they all are aware of the high stakes. May the best man win.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored