JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, April 5, 2025

Kamla–Rani of Jhansi

by

20100218

Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar's vic­to­ry in the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress' (UNC) in­ter­nal elec­tion was his­toric in that for the first time in T&T, a fe­male was in charge of a ma­jor po­lit­i­cal par­ty. In an­oth­er re­gard, the tri­umph was sig­nif­i­cant in that it marked the end of the Pan­day era in T&T pol­i­tics and by ex­ten­sion the end of the charis­mat­ic era of Carib-bean lead­ers. Kam­la, to many, faced an in­sur­mount­able chal­lenge in the form of the "Pan­day fac­tor." The ground, how­ev­er, moved seem­ing­ly un­known to Pan­day. This move­ment be­gan as a trick­le with Hulsie Bhag­gan, build­ing with Ramesh Lawrence Ma­haraj, gain­ing mo­men­tum with Win­ston Dook­er­an and fi­nal­ly suc­ceed­ing with Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar.

The gen­uine­ly in­de­pen­dent poll­sters were cor­rect­ly fore­cast­ing a Kam­la vic­to­ry but the Pan­day camp was re­ly­ing on bo­gus polls and char­ac­ter as­sas­si­na­tion. They fought un­der the il­lu­sion that a Hin­du-trained woman was weak and could nev­er with­stand the Pan­day on­slaught. Mole­polole is a mar­ket re­search com­pa­ny based in T&T and some of its clients in­clude Dig­i­cel, Bet­ter Net­work, T&T Guardian, Gayelle, Unilever and the Gov­ern­ment of St Kitts. On Jan­u­ary 21, three days be­fore the UNC poll, it found that out of the 325 par­ty mem­bers polled, the ma­jor­i­ty favoured Kam­la. The fact that the fi­nal and suc­cess­ful chal­lenger to the Pan­day jug­ger­naut was a Hin­du fe­male re­sult­ed in a lev­el of hos­til­i­ty that made many with­in and out­side the UNC cringe in dis­gust. The at­tempts to ma­lign the char­ac­ter of Kam­la in­di­cat­ed a lev­el of des­per­a­tion with­in the Pan­day camp but more sig­nif­i­cant­ly it sim­ply just turned off vot­ers.

Many po­ten­tial vot­ers were un­com­fort­able sup­port­ing Pan­day, who was point­ing to a weak­ness in Per­sad-Bisses­sar af­ter he had sup­port­ed her ca­reer po­lit­i­cal­ly over the years. Many oth­ers felt that Pan­day plain­ly did not have the moral le­git­i­ma­cy to make any char­ac­ter at­tacks on Per­sad-Bisses­sar. Es­sen­tial­ly this was one form in which the UNC faith­ful ral­lied round Kam­la. The neg­a­tive ste-reo­type, which the Pan­day fac­tion at­tempt­ed to paint Kam­la, back­fired with a land­slide vic­to­ry in favour of a woman un­der at­tack. Un­for­tu­nate­ly for Pan­day, the on­ly neg­a­tive stereo­type that emerged strong­ly was that of an In­di­an male bat­ter­ing an In­di­an fe­male. An op­pressed and sup­pressed In­di­an fe­male try­ing to do what is right for her com­mu­ni­ty/ fam­i­ly and be­ing mer­ci­less­ly beat­en up­on by an un­car­ing male. Yet in true epic style, de­spite this hu­mil­i­a­tion and chal­lenge, the stead­fast con­tender to the UNC throne emerged as the vic­tor.

Among the faith­ful, Kam­la is be­ing re­ferred to as the "Rani of Jhan­si," a his­tor­i­cal In­di­an fe­male fig­ure who fought against the British as they in­vad­ed her coun­try. When the colo­nial sol­diers at­tempt­ed to an­nex her coun­try at the death of her hus­band, she be­came a war­rior. Just as Kam­la was be­ing ac­cused false­ly so too was the Rani. This cat­a­pult­ed her from be­ing a house­wife to the leader of an army. Even to­day she is re­ferred to as the most im­por­tant leader in the In­di­an re­bel­lion against the British in 1854. A rather for­mi­da­ble young woman, the Rani of Jhan­si died in 1858 fight­ing the British in what was the last ma­jor ac­tion in the great In­di­an re­bel­lion which had start­ed the year be­fore. His­to­ry of this bat­tle was writ­ten by British his­to­ri­ans who pre­fer to re­fer to this first In­dia in­de­pen­dence bat­tle as the "In­di­an Mutiny."

To­day her name is com­mon­place through­out In­dia, renowned as a leader of the re­bel­lion. But she was more than a mar­tial leader. In her brief time she cast aside many con­ven­tions to unite peo­ples of all castes and re­li­gions in her cause. She put aside pur­dah, which she on­ly ob­served with re­spect to the British. She en­cour­aged oth­er women to do the same and trained them to fight and sup­port the main army. She was not the on­ly Jhan­si woman to die fight­ing the British. She cut across the so­cial norms of the time, re­fus­ing to ac­cept her fate "as a woman." She cared for all her peo­ple and con­sult­ed with them at cru­cial times and car­ried them with her.

The Rani died on June 18, 1858, dur­ing the bat­tle for Gwalior with 8th Hus­sars that took place in Ko­tah-Ki-Serai near the Phool Bagh area of Gwalior. She donned war­riors' clothes and rode on a horse in­to bat­tle to save Gwalior Fort, about 120 miles west of Luc­know in what is now the state of Ut­tar Pradesh. The British cap­tured Gwalior three days lat­er. In the re­port of the bat­tle for Gwalior, Gen­er­al Sir Hugh Rose com­ment­ed that the Rani, "re­mark­able for her beau­ty, clev­er­ness and per­se­ver­ance," had been "the most dan­ger­ous of all the rebel lead­ers". This is a part of the lega­cy of Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar and all the women of T&T!

Sat­narayan Ma­haraj is the

sec­re­tary gen­er­al of the

Sanatan Dhar­ma Ma­ha Sab­ha


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored