JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, February 24, 2025

AG exposes deep Govt bias

by

20100408

If, ac­cord­ing to AG John Je­re­mie, Prime Min­is­ter Patrick Man­ning stands vin­di­cat­ed by the Uff Re­port for his pur­suit of the $10 mil­lion dis­crep­an­cy on the Cleaver Heights hous­ing project, by the same log­ic the Prime Min­is­ter and his en­tire Cab­i­net must be crim­i­nal­ly neg­li­gent in fail­ing to pre­vent the pil­lage of hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars on sev­er­al con­struc­tion projects un­der­tak­en by Ude­cott. Sad­ly, the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al's state­ment in the Par­lia­ment on Tues­day in lay­ing the Uff Re­port on­ly il­lus­trat­ed the deep bias held by the Gov­ern­ment in the mat­ters probed in the Uff en­quiry. In his 36-minute state­ment, Mr Je­re­mie sought to de­flect at­ten­tion from the nu­mer­ous fun­da­men­tal trans­gres­sions of Ude­cott as cit­ed by the Uff re­port, in­stead of shin­ing light on these trans­gres­sions. Con­tin­u­ing the war against the lo­cal con­struc­tion sec­tor start­ed by Prime Min­is­ter Man­ning, the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al picked and chose the com­ments and con­clu­sions in the re­port that dealt with the in­ad­e­qua­cies of lo­cal con­trac­tors in gen­er­al.

He sought des­per­ate­ly to plead a case for how right and jus­ti­fied Prime Min­is­ter Man­ning was in seek­ing to save the coun­try from a pos­si­ble $10 mil­lion ad­di­tion­al ex­pen­di­ture on Cleaver Heights, but he was hope­less­ly silent on how neg­li­gent, per­haps crim­i­nal­ly so, the Prime Min­is­ter and his Cab­i­net have been in not de­tect­ing the ab­solute de­fi­cien­cies of Ude­cott, its chair­man and the board in the han­dling of the Tarou­ba sta­di­um and the Min­istry of Le­gal Af­fairs projects, as point­ed out by the Uff Com­mis­sion. In­deed, he ne­glect­ed to point out that the com­mis­sion found the in­sti­tu­tion­al struc­ture of Ude­cott se­ri­ous­ly flawed, and "that there should be no doubt as to the pow­er of min­is­ters to give in­struc­tions to gov­ern­ment agency com­pa­nies on any mat­ter with­in the min­is­ter's re­mit..." While prais­ing the val­ue of the de­sign-con­struct mod­el em­ployed by the Gov­ern­ment, the AG did not let nary a word slip from his mouth on the com­mis­sion's ob­ser­va­tion that for­eign con­trac­tors must be made to de­vel­op and en­hance the ca­pac­i­ty of the lo­cal in­dus­try.

He avoid­ed too the find­ings of the com­mis­sion­ers that Gov­ern­ment hand­ed com­plete pow­er to the ex­ec­u­tive chair­man of Ude­cott, Calder Hart, against the best ad­vice and the pru­dence of age-old wis­dom. And while the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al ab­stract­ed long pas­sages of the re­port on in­ad­e­qua­cies of su­per­vi­sion on Cleaver Heights, he ne­glect­ed quotes such as this about Ude­cott's op­er­a­tions: "Is­sues con­cern­ing fi­nan­cial ad­min­is­tra­tion of the Bri­an Lara project are noth­ing short of scan­dalous." There was no men­tion by Mr Je­re­mie about Ude­cott's "ex­ces­sive and un­fair us­es of sole se­lec­tive ten­der­ing pow­ers con­trary to free and fair com­pe­ti­tion and trans­paren­cy." Nei­ther did he both­er to dis­turb the Sen­ate about "the mis­use or ma­nip­u­la­tion of ten­der and ten­der re­view pro­ce­dures lead­ing to the in­ap­pro­pri­ate and po­ten­tial­ly cor­rupt award of con­tracts." While the de­lays and the es­ca­la­tion in the cost of the Tarou­ba sta­di­um would have trou­bled most cit­i­zens con­cerned about val­ue for mon­ey, the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al found no time to ex­plain the dra­mat­ic near tripling in the sta­di­um's cost nor the fail­ure of the con­trac­tor to de­liv­er the project af­ter four years on the job.

In de­fence of their stew­ard­ship, the AG and the Gov­ern­ment would claim that they have made the re­port pub­lic and ini­ti­at­ed in­ves­ti­ga­tions against Mr Hart and the board. They had lit­tle op­tion but to do so giv­en the vig­or­ous in­ves­ti­ga­tion pur­sued by the op­po­si­tion par­ties and the re­portage and analy­sis of the me­dia. Tues­day's speech was a trans­par­ent at­tempt by the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al to so dis­tort the re­al­i­ty of the find­ings to make as if the known de­fi­cien­cies of the lo­cal con­struc­tion sec­tor were the ma­jor find­ings of the Uff Com­mis­sion. It would not be sur­pris­ing if the le­gal fra­ter­ni­ty were to find the AG guilty of ne­glect­ing to cham­pi­on the in­ter­est of his clients, the peo­ple of T&T, in favour of his Prime Min­is­ter and Gov­ern­ment.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored