JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, March 17, 2025

Sexual abuse by the Church and Teachers

by

20100411

?It goes with­out say­ing that the T&T Coali­tion Against Do­mes­tic Vi­o­lence is deeply up­set over the week­ly re­ports ap­pear­ing in the for­eign me­dia, on­ly some of which are re­peat­ed in the lo­cal me­dia, about the abuse of chil­dren by priests in the Ro­man Catholic Church. Equal­ly up­set­ting is the of­fi­cial cov­er-up of such abuse and the or­gan­i­sa­tion­al re­sponse when such abuse is dis­cov­ered which has been to send the of­fend­ing per­pe­tra­tors to a dif­fer­ent post­ing with­out warn­ing the new parish­ioners of the dan­ger to which their chil­dren have been ex­posed. The dis­may aris­es be­cause of the suf­fer­ing of the chil­dren. Not least be­cause the re­ports are on­ly deal­ing with the abuse of boy chil­dren. Since re­search in­di­cates that on­ly about eight-ten per cent of all men are ho­mo­sex­u­al, and a very small per­cent­age, per­haps 1.5 per cent, of those are pae­dophiles, what about the acts com­mit­ted by�the oth­er 90-92 per cent of the male cler­gy?

If the sta­tis­tics hold, there would be an es­ti­mat­ed 13.5 per cent of het­ero­sex­u­al priests who have pae­dophil­i­ac ten­den­cies, in­volv­ing girl chil­dren. I can't help but won­der about the girls that have been abused by het­ero­sex­u­al cler­gy who are al­so sworn to celiba­cy and there­fore de­nied by their re­li­gion a nor­mal sex­u­al out­let? In­ter­net re­search on priests' sex­u­al abuse of chil­dren re­sults in 1,760,000 en­tries, the ma­jor­i­ty of them deal­ing with the abuse of boy chil­dren. And why is no in­ves­ti­ga­tion be­ing done about the abuse of girl chil­dren? Over the last 40 years that I have been in the Coali­tion Against Do­mes­tic Vi­o­lence, I have had nu­mer­ous one-on-one re­ports from women who were sex­u­al­ly abused as chil­dren by "celi­bate" priests. There­fore, in all the "trans­paren­cy" now com­ing out about child abuse in that church, I find it is cu­ri­ous that no one is men­tion­ing the girls.

It doesn't even ap­pear that there is a cov­er-up where the girls are con­cerned. It is as if they don't mat­ter, and that apart from the bat­ter­ing and oth­er phys­i­cal abuse of girls by nuns in Catholic schools, ju­ve­nile de­ten­tion in­sti­tu­tions and or­phan­ages in Ire­land and Chica­go, which did get some ex­po­sure a few years ago, noth­ing about the abuse of girl chil­dren is deemed to be im­por­tant. The sex­u­al abuse of girls in the Catholic Church by cler­gy can­not have been un­known to their own au­thor­i­ties. Not that the abuse of girl chil­dren on­ly hap­pens in the Ro­man Catholic Church. In Trinidad we have had re­ports about such abuse from vir­tu­al­ly every re­li­gious de­nom­i­na­tion, al­though in the ma­jor­i­ty of those cas­es the per­pe­tra­tors did not claim to be celi­bate. They talked, with equal hypocrisy, about "pas­toral care," "pas­toral coun­selling" and, iron­i­cal­ly enough, "us­ing the rod of cor­rec­tion."

Pun­dits have their own vo­cab­u­lary about "cleans­ing rit­u­als" and "re­mov­ing evil spir­its." The re­ports of sex­u­al abuse of girls in gov­ern­ment schools by male teach­ers al­so seem to have been main­ly hushed up, even af­ter re­ports have been made to the min­istry, if an­guished re­ports from par­ents are to be cred­it­ed. Teach­ers car­ry great au­thor­i­ty over the young. If girls are warned by the abuser that, if they tell any­one, "I will make sure that your fa­ther is fired," or that "your lit­tle broth­er will fail his ex­ams," they be­lieve with­out ques­tion. At least in this there is no gen­der dis­crim­i­na­tion. Abuse of boys in schools in Trinidad is al­so sel­dom dealt with. Al­though ma­chin­ery ex­ists, it in­volves re­ports go­ing to the Min­istry of Ed­u­ca­tion and is so slow, bu­reau­crat­ic, and time-con­sum­ing that the abused child has to face the per­pe­tra­tor every day for months be­fore any­thing is done.

Few chil­dren can with­stand the emo­tion­al or psy­cho­log­i­cal pres­sure. And few ever do. Abusers know that. Two wrongs, or ten wrongs, do not make a right.

Any abuse of chil­dren by fig­ures of au­thor­i­ty in schools does not lessen the wrong done by mem­bers of the cler­gy. Abuse of boy chil­dren by mem­bers of the cler­gy in oth­er de­nom­i­na­tions does not ex­cuse abuse of boys by mem­bers of the Ro­man Catholic Church who vow "celiba­cy." Or the of­fi­cial cov­er-up of such abuse. And ex­po­sure of the sex­u­al abuse of boy chil­dren (and, yes, "grop­ing" is clas­si­fied as sex­u­al abuse) does not ex­cuse the abuse of girl chil­dren.

?Di­ana Ma­habir-Wy­att

Chair, T&T Coali­tion

Against Do­mes­tic Vi­o­lence


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored