JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Doctor shines light on DNA in Forensics

by

20120702

Any con­tact be­tween hu­man be­ings leaves be­hind DNA (De­oxyri­bonu­cle­ic acid.) "When we shake hands we ex­change sweat and this as well as sali­va, hair and any­thing con­tain­ing nu­cle­at­ed cells hold DNA," ex­plained Dr Valery Alexan­drov, a foren­sic pathol­o­gist for the past 40 years who is cur­rent­ly based at the Foren­sic Sci­ence Cen­tre in St James. Dr Alexan­drov, who has stud­ied and worked with DNA ex­clu­sive­ly, spends most of his work­ing hours un­cov­er­ing ev­i­dence to help po­lice solve mur­ders-the type found on a vic­tim's body and left, usu­al­ly un­know­ing­ly, by at­tack­ers. DNA is found in any nu­cle­us con­tain­ing cell in the body-every cell ex­cept for red blood cells and the skin ker­atin. The mil­lions of DNA in the hu­man body are con­tained in sweat, sali­va and even hair. Every hu­man be­ing gets 50 per cent of their DNA from their moth­er and 50 per cent from their fa­ther. "This is the ba­sis for pa­ter­ni­ty test­ing," said Alexan­drov.

In clin­i­cal ap­pli­ca­tions, DNA can in­di­cate ge­net­ic ab­nor­mal­i­ties, mu­ta­tions and ra­di­a­tion that caus­es ge­net­ic mu­ta­tions."If you have even a sin­gle cell, you can ex­tract DNA," he said, adding that the sci­ence DNA is an analy­sis of match. Alexan­drov said be­fore DNA ev­i­dence was in­tro­duced to courts, po­lice re­lied on blood groups to in­ves­ti­gate crimes. "The prob­lem was that most of the pop­u­la­tion have the same blood groups so the ev­i­dence was some­times in­con­clu­sive," he said. "DNA ev­i­dence is 99.99 per cent ac­cu­rate and has made a re­mark­able dif­fer­ence in foren­sics." How­ev­er, Dr Alexan­drov said, DNA can be dif­fi­cult to un­der­stand. "Peo­ple are usu­al­ly mis­led, I think by the me­dia, they think au­top­sy is a mag­ic tool that solves crimes. "The au­top­sy, which in­cludes DNA ev­i­dence, is im­por­tant and es­sen­tial but on­ly when com­bined with a po­lice in­ves­ti­ga­tion. An au­top­sy can­not solve crimes." Alexan­drov said peo­ple usu­al­ly be­lieve if DNA is found on a body at a crime scene, it is 100 per cent im­plied that the vic­tim was as­sault­ed.

"It's not like that. I can com­pare it to find­ing se­men on a body. This is in­dica­tive of in­ter­course but not rape. Find­ing for­eign DNA on a body just means the per­son had con­tact with some­one else," he said. "The rest of the sce­nario, whether a beat­ing or a touch is a mat­ter of po­lice in­ves­ti­ga­tion." How it's done? "In our au­top­sy, we take fin­ger nail clip­pings and when pos­si­ble blood from the vic­tim. He said a pathol­o­gist can de­ter­mine that DNA was trans­ferred, but not why. "The blood DNA and fin­ger nail DNA will match 100 per cent but the pres­ence of for­eign DNA in­di­cates phys­i­cal con­tact which shows DNA trans­fer," he said. A tech­nique known as Poly­merase Chain Re­ac­tion (PCR), where spe­cial en­zymes are ap­plied to DNA to cut out pieces of it, sep­a­rates iden­ti­cal pieces of DNA leav­ing be­hind pieces that do not match. Alexan­drov said prob­lems can oc­cur in the process but are based on hu­man rather than method fail­ure.

"The ma­jor prob­lem with DNA is con­t­a­m­i­na­tion from us­ing in­stru­ments that aren't ster­ile, from mould and air par­ti­cles-al­most any­thing can con­t­a­m­i­nate DNA."

He said this is a big prob­lem be­cause when DNA spe­cial­ists go to court they will al­ways have to an­swer whether the sam­ple was con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed. He said at the crime scene, the pathol­o­gist takes DNA sam­ples and gives it to a po­lice of­fi­cer who takes it to an ev­i­dence room. The per­son in the ev­i­dence room will take it to the lab where it is dis­trib­uted among lab per­son­nel. "Every sam­ple pass­es five to six hands so there is a lot of room for con­t­a­m­i­na­tion," said Alexan­drov. In the Unit­ed States DNA ev­i­dence is pro­duced in court quite fre­quent­ly but it rarely reach­es the courts in T&T. He said DNA ev­i­dence is used lo­cal­ly but be­cause of the struc­ture of our le­gal sys­tem, it takes longer. "There are five foren­sic pathol­o­gists that I know that are from this coun­try and they all work in the Unit­ed States," said Alexan­drov. He felt that this was un­for­tu­nate but added that foren­sic pathol­o­gists were al­ways in de­mand and the US of­fered more in terms of com­pen­sa­tion.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored