JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, February 11, 2025

Fixing Panorama

by

20160121

The T&T Guardian is run­ning a two-part se­ries that ex­plores the vi­a­bil­i­ty of the steel­band move­ment and of the Car­ni­val sta­ple, Panora­ma. To­day, mu­sic crit­ic and an­a­lyst Nigel A Camp­bell looks at how the pan move­ment can de­vel­op oth­er sources of rev­enue and stop its de­pen­dence on gov­ern­ment fund­ing.

PART 1

The an­nu­al rit­u­al of the steel­band Panora­ma com­pe­ti­tion has be­gun in T&T, and con­tin­ues apace through the stages cul­mi­nat­ing on Car­ni­val Sat­ur­day with the fi­nals. With the fi­nan­cial cut­backs in all ar­eas of the econ­o­my in­clud­ing Car­ni­val, there is a recog­ni­tion that the sum of the parts have to be ef­fi­cient and ex­cel­lent to make the whole bet­ter.

The holis­tic view tak­en by some com­men­ta­tors and pun­dits–of Panora­ma be­ing in need of "fix­ing"–has raised the ques­tion of why has this analy­sis not been done and im­ple­ment­ed be­fore this re­ces­sion, and why, even in these times, does the State still pump mon­ey in the mil­lions in­to Car­ni­val and its events such as Panora­ma.

A sim­ple an­swer could be that Panora­ma rep­re­sents the apoth­e­o­sis of the na­tion­al in­stru­ment. That rea­son­ing was sup­plied by steel­pan re­searcher Dr Kim John­son, who spoke to the T&T Guardian about the idea of the con­tin­u­a­tion of the state-fund­ed event with­in the con­text of mori­bund stan­dards for the in­dus­try of steel­pan through­out the year.

John­son not­ed the his­to­ry of Panora­ma: "Panora­ma was the PNM gov­ern­ment of the 1960s tak­ing con­trol of the steel­band move­ment, what they saw as na­tion­al cul­ture. The strat­e­gy in­clud­ed mak­ing it more lu­cra­tive to play in Panora­ma be­cause of prize mon­ey and ap­pear­ance fees than to play in par­ties and f�tes."

The in­trigue con­tin­ues with the as­ser­tion that the ear­ly Panora­ma be­came the an­tithe­sis of the ex­ist­ing Bomb com­pe­ti­tion with op­pos­ing class and racial groups chal­leng­ing for con­trol and in­flu­ence–the new gov­ern­ing elite in­sist­ing that ca­lyp­so be played ver­sus the work­ing class play­ing clas­si­cal mu­sic–and crit­i­cal­ly vot­er sup­port.

"PNM had no or­gan­ised mass­es like a union, so pan­men rep­re­sent­ed a struc­tured link to the vot­ing mass­es," said John­son.

The link be­tween po­lit­i­cal fate and cul­ture con­trol is ob­served in coun­tries in the re­gion like Cu­ba, and even here when ca­lyp­so lyrics were sub­ject to cen­sors speaks of a kind of con­tin­ued con­trol. Nowa­days, the State spends mil­lions on the con­tin­u­a­tion of Car­ni­val both as cathar­sis and eco­nom­ic in­put via tourism and the eco­nom­ic mul­ti­pli­er ef­fect of trade at that time. In 2016, $270 mil­lion is al­lo­cat­ed to the Na­tion­al Car­ni­val Com­mis­sion (NCC), which ef­fec­tive­ly runs Car­ni­val, of which Pan Trin­ba­go got $30 mil­lion. Pan Trin­ba­go head Kei­th Di­az says his or­gan­i­sa­tion re­quest­ed $45 mil­lion from the gov­ern­ment, but Cul­ture min­is­ter Dr Nyan Gads­by-Dol­ly said, "The cur­rent eco­nom­ic con­di­tions have forced the Gov­ern­ment to cut back." Ef­forts to get a state­ment from the min­is­ter in re­la­tion to the ques­tion of the ra­tio­nale and pol­i­cy for state fund­ing of steel­pan proved fu­tile.

The peo­ple's rep­re­sen­ta­tives in the Par­lia­ment, dur­ing Joint Se­lect Com­mit­tee (JSC) hear­ings in 2012, look­ing in­to the man­age­ment of the NCC, re­port­ed their find­ings in a re­port that spoke about fi­nan­cial and man­age­ment mat­ters at the or­gan­i­sa­tion, and con­clu­sions from this re­port pro­vide some an­swers to ques­tions of the vi­a­bil­i­ty of the Panora­ma event and the spin-off projects like the dis­put­ed Greens, a sep­a­rate area in the Sa­van­nah that was de­vel­oped for pa­trons who want to be in the Sa­van­nah for a par­ty but not nec­es­sar­i­ly for the pan. The re­port specif­i­cal­ly not­ed con­ges­tion of the mas­quer­ade on Car­ni­val Tues­day, and on­ly touched on the stalled con­struc­tion of the Pan Trin­ba­go head­quar­ters–at least $5.8 mil­lion spent and un­fin­ished since 2002–and the move­ment away from T&T of the steel­pan in­dus­try. Any no­tions of a long Panora­ma event–an as­ser­tion made by some to rec­om­mend fix­ing–were not con­clud­ed as a prob­lem.

When chal­lenged by for­mer sen­a­tor Em­manuel George to jus­ti­fy the Greens space as a si­mul­ta­ne­ous "fete" when the fo­cus should be on pan at Panora­ma, Clarence Moe, then NCC CEO re­spond­ed that, "There is a push at present to tell the in­ter­est groups (Pan Trin­ba­go in this case), your events and ac­tiv­i­ties must be vi­able. That you must be able to at least in­crease the lev­els of rev­enue, be­cause the shows and the events that you put on have the po­ten­tial for rais­ing high­er rev­enues...this year has gen­er­at­ed the great­est lev­el of rev­enue that we have ever seen, in­deed it was al­most dou­bled."

Eco­nom­ics trumped all oth­er con­sid­er­a­tions. De­spite some pull-out from par­ty or­gan­is­ers and pro­mo­tions com­pa­nies, com­pa­nies are or­gan­is­ing their crews for the Sa­van­nah Par­ty on Sun­day.

Pan Trin­ba­go vice pres­i­dent Bry­on Ser­rette, in 2014, jus­ti­fied the ex­is­tence of the Greens by not­ing that "while a lot of the younger gen­er­a­tion mem­bers are play­ing with the steel­bands, their peers have not been sup­port­ing the event...they would pre­fer not to sit in one spot for hours lis­ten­ing to the bands....Pan Trin­ba­go, there­fore, took the de­ci­sion to ac­com­mo­date these pa­trons by giv­ing them a space in which they would be com­fort­able, and at the same time con­tribute to the rev­enues we are ex­pect­ed to gen­er­ate from the event."

Kei­th Di­az, Pan Trin­ba­go pres­i­dent re­it­er­ates, "Pan Trin­ba­go is not the Pan Trin­ba­go of yes­ter­year. We are now a busi­ness-dri­ven en­ter­prise."

It must be not­ed that near­ly 90 per cent of the NCC's bud­get comes via gov­ern­ment sub­ven­tion. Pan Trin­ba­go's mon­ey is a mix of pub­lic and pri­vate fund­ing with a very small por­tion of rev­enue com­ing from gate re­ceipts and rentals. But Panora­ma is not on­ly about mon­ey, it is about per­for­mance and in­creas­ing­ly about broad­cast and in­tel­lec­tu­al prop­er­ty ex­ploita­tion.

The re­cent ex­am­ple of the marathon In­ter­na­tion­al So­ca Monarch se­mi-fi­nals has shone a new spot­light on the idea of broad­cast­ing and live stream­ing of Car­ni­val events and the pro­duc­tion val­ues ex­pect­ed of those broad­casts. The idea of broad­cast­ing fes­ti­val type events has prece­dence in the BBC broad­casts of Glas­ton­bury and state tele­vi­sion sta­tions in Eu­rope broad­cast­ing jazz fes­ti­vals like Es­ti­val in Lugano, Switzer­land, and Jaz­zal­dia in San Se­basti�n, Spain, as in­ter­na­tion­al ex­am­ples. Snap­shots or even sets by acts sup­port a tele­vi­sion broad­cast that is dis­trib­uted world­wide.

The lo­cal pref­er­ence to po­si­tion a cam­era or a bank of cam­eras on un­pre­pared singers or eight minute bursts of steel­pan per­for­mance sand­wiched be­tween 20 min­utes of tran­si­tion time be­tween bands cre­ates a bad tele­vi­sion ex­pe­ri­ence and a prod­uct that isn't vi­able for live pay per view au­di­ences.

At the 2012 JSC hear­ings, the NCC ad­mit­ted fail­ure to fur­ther ex­ploit broad­cast rights cit­ing "the lack of prop­er tech­nol­o­gy" and al­so spoke about their in­abil­i­ty to col­lect ac­cred­i­ta­tion fees from in­ter­na­tion­al pho­tog­ra­phers.

It's clear that T&T is be­hind the learn­ing curve of mod­ern tech­nol­o­gy and trends, and the slow buy-in to the no­tion that lo­cal au­di­ences' ex­pec­ta­tions have in­creased and they ex­pect the in­ter­na­tion­al stan­dards seen in for­eign pro­duc­tions.

Panora­ma sat­is­fies an age­ing de­mo­graph­ic, which can not sus­tain it as a pop­u­lar mu­sic and it con­tin­ues be­cause the state seeks to main­tain sup­port, fi­nan­cial­ly and oth­er­wise for a "na­tion­al" cul­ture. Panora­ma con­tin­ues be­cause its own­er, Pan Trin­ba­go, has made it the acme of the in­stru­ment and the in­dus­try.

Nestor Sul­li­van, who has been in­volved in pan for many years, sug­gests, "Panora­ma seems to be the 'de­f­i­n­i­tion of steel­pan' but as a cat­a­lyst for an­nu­al mu­sic prac­tis­ing and de­vel­op­ment, it is not do­ing that."

John­son mean­while be­lieves that, "steel­band is mod­ern in­stru­ment that pre­serves the an­cient idea that mu­sic is par­tic­i­pa­tion."

These two ideas sug­gest that the an­nu­al rite of pas­sage that is Panora­ma may be in need of fix­ing, but it can on­ly be fixed when the steel­band move­ment and the so­ci­ety at large recog­nis­es that this re­quires a dras­tic par­a­digm change.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored