JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, April 6, 2025

DPP: I was not consulted

by

20111204

At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Anand Ram­lo­gan says the law must take its course and if there is no ev­i­dence against the 16 de­tainees, then they must be set free. Say­ing that the law must be re­spect­ed at all times, Ram­lo­gan added: "The rule of law must be re­spect­ed at any and all costs and Gov­ern­ment is com­mit­ted to the rule of law. "If there is in­suf­fi­cient ev­i­dence to jus­ti­fy the lay­ing of charges, then the de­tainees must be set free in ac­cor­dance to law," he said in an in­ter­view yes­ter­day. The At­tor­ney Gen­er­al al­so made it clear that the lay­ing of charges was a mat­ter for the po­lice in con­sul­ta­tion with the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions (DPP).

Asked what charges, if any, were ex­pect­ed to be laid on the de­tainees, Ram­lo­gan said he was not ad­vised whether or not charges would be laid. "But I am not sur­prised be­cause this is not a mat­ter that in­volves the ex­ec­u­tive arm of the State," he said. "It is a mat­ter ex­clu­sive­ly for the po­lice and for the DPP who would ad­vise if and when con­sult­ed." Up to late yes­ter­day af­ter­noon, the State did not ap­proach DPP Roger Gas­pard to seek ad­vice whether or not charges should be laid against 16 de­tainees. Con­tact­ed yes­ter­day, Gas­pard said he was in of­fice up un­til 7 pm and had no con­sul­ta­tion with any one. "No­body has sought my ad­vice in re­la­tion to bring­ing any crim­i­nal charges," he said.

"I'm in my of­fice do­ing my nor­mal work and I have not been con­sult­ed on this mat­ter...No one has opt­ed to have an au­di­ence with me," Gas­pard said. But a se­nior lawyer, who asked not to be iden­ti­fied, said giv­en the na­ture of the al­le­ga­tions, it would have been "ob­vi­ous­ly ap­pro­pri­ate" for the po­lice to main­tain a close con­nec­tion with the of­fice of the DPP and to seek ad­vice re­gard­ing what na­ture of charges could be laid. The at­tor­ney said in­ves­ti­ga­tors, de­pend­ing on what charges they were pur­su­ing, were not du­ty-bound to con­sult the DPP and could go ahead and lay the charges. On the oth­er hand, how­ev­er, the DPP must give the di­rec­tive to lay cer­tain charges which would in­clude per­jury, sedi­tion and charges re­lat­ing un­der the Pre­ven­tion of Cor­rup­tion Act," the at­tor­ney ex­plained.

"These charges can on­ly be sanc­tioned by the DPP," the lawyer added. Gas­pard, how­ev­er, re­it­er­at­ed that in the case of spe­cial pros­e­cu­tors, his of­fice was the sole au­thor­i­ty to pros­e­cute crim­i­nal mat­ters. He said in the event that a spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor had to be ap­point­ed out­side the of­fice of the DPP any mat­ter, he (the DPP) was the sole per­son to grant a fi­at to that par­tic­u­lar at­tor­ney or at­tor­neys to pros­e­cute. At­tor­ney rep­re­sent­ing Khalil Kara­math, Se­nior Coun­sel Pamela El­der, in an in­ter­view yes­ter­day, said the State had found it­self in a dif­fi­cult po­si­tion. She said the State went ahead and served or­ders which in­di­cat­ed that the 16 were dan­ger­ous peo­ple who were like­ly to en­dan­ger the lives of the pub­lic.

"So if these are in­deed dan­ger­ous peo­ple, how would the pub­lic be pro­tect­ed on the ex­pi­ra­tion of the state of emer­gency?" El­der said. She added that af­ter de­ten­tion or­ders were ini­tial­ly served on the 16, they were then served with par­tic­u­lars which were sub­se­quent­ly served on Fri­day. De­ten­tion or­ders were slapped on the 16 men for al­leged­ly be­ing in­volved in a plot to as­sas­si­nate Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar and three se­nior Gov­ern­ment min­is­ters. Oth­ers were iden­ti­fied as al­leged­ly be­ing be­hind a plot to desta­bilise Trinidad and To­ba­go and cause ma­jor pan­ic. The or­ders were made by the Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter Brigadier John Sandy, in ac­cor­dance with para­graph two of the sec­ond sched­ule to the Emer­gency Pow­ers Reg­u­la­tions, 2011.

The Plot

Par­tic­u­lars for de­ten­tion or­der ob­tained by The Guardian re­gard­ing plot to desta­bilise Trinidad and To­ba­go and cause ma­jor pan­ic:

On Oc­to­ber 28, 2011, an of­fi­cer of the Spe­cial Branch Unit of the Trinidad and To­ba­go Po­lice Ser­vice re­ceived cred­i­ble in­for­ma­tion from a con­fi­den­tial in­for­mant that there was be­ing planned, a plot to desta­bilise Trinidad and To­ba­go and cause ma­jor pan­ic and that the de­tainee was the mas­ter­mind be­hind the plot. The in­for­ma­tion from the said con­fi­den­tial in­for­mant was that the de­tainee was the leader of a ex­trem­ist Is­lam­ic group which meets at Ch­agua­nas and that the de­tainee reg­u­lar­ly es­pous­es ex­trem­ist and rad­i­cal Is­lam­ic be­liefs at these masjids.

The said con­fi­den­tial in­for­mant al­so said that the de­tainee had re­cruit­ed mem­bers of his re­li­gious group to car­ry out the de­tainee's plan to desta­bilise Trinidad and To­ba­go. On Sep­tem­ber 18, 2011, three men all be­lieved to be mem­bers of the de­tainee's rad­i­cal Is­lam­ic group were ar­rest­ed at Waller­field, af­ter a pe­ri­od of sur­veil­lance con­duct­ed by mem­bers of the Crim­i­nal In­tel­li­gence Unit (CIU). Up­on the ar­rest of cer­tain peo­ple the fol­low­ing items were seized by the po­lice:

• One Glock 17 pis­tol

• 30 round of 0.40 mm am­mu­ni­tion

• 24 rounds of 9 mm am­mu­ni­tion

• 10 rounds of 9 mm am­mu­ni­tion

• 6 firearm mag­a­zines

• 1 ri­fle firearm with scope

• 2 bul­let­proof vests

• 2 Po­lice Vel­cro patch­es

• 1 blue sweater re­sem­bling that used by mem­bers of the Guard and Emer­gency Branch

• Trinidad and To­ba­go De­fence Force cam­ou­flage jack­et and pants

• 2 stolen ve­hi­cles.

• 1 com­put­er on which was stored an­ti-ter­ror­ist and weapon train­ing ma­te­r­i­al orig­i­nat­ing from the Unit­ed States' Fed­er­al Bu­reau of In­ves­ti­ga­tions and Spe­cial Air Ser­vices

In­for­ma­tion re­ceived from the said con­fi­den­tial source was that a de­tainee was re­spon­si­ble for pur­chas­ing am­mu­ni­tion for the said plot. In 2010, the de­tainee was ar­rest­ed and charged with pos­ses­sion of more than 1,000 rounds of am­mu­ni­tion af­ter said am­mu­ni­tion was found at his home along with a num­ber of high-pow­ered ri­fles, in­clud­ing AK47 as­sault ri­fles and a large quan­ti­ty of nar­cotics. In­tel­li­gence re­ceived has linked the de­tainee to the im­por­ta­tion of so­phis­ti­cat­ed weapons that were ca­pa­ble of long range as­sas­si­na­tion and to­geth­er a cen­tral busi­ness­man whose home was searched and a large cache of high pow­ered ri­fles were re­cent­ly found, is sus­pect­ed in the im­por­ta­tion of such weapons.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored