JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, April 5, 2025

Govt proving to be a threat to T&T says Hinds

by

20111204

If the 16 peo­ple de­tained by the State over an al­leged plot to as­sas­si­nate the Prime Min­is­ter and three Cab­i­net Min­is­ters are re­leased with­out charge to­day, it will show that the Gov­ern­ment is a clear and ex­ist­ing threat to T&T, says PNM sen­a­tor Fitzger­ald Hinds. "All it will do, in my view, is con­cre­tise that the Gov­ern­ment is a clear and ex­ist­ing threat to T&T and should be re­moved prompt­ly...of course by de­mo­c­ra­t­ic means," Hinds said yes­ter­day. The Op­po­si­tion sen­a­tor was re­spond­ing to ques­tions on the re­moval of the state of emer­gency mid­night to­day. When the state of emer­gency is re­moved, the 16 de­tainees who are be­ing held un­der de­ten­tion or­ders may have to be re­leased if no charges have been brought against them.

"Up to now, as we speak, no­body has been charged for any­thing...It's ob­vi­ous they (the po­lice) are hav­ing dif­fi­cul­ty with ev­i­dence," Hinds said. "Up to now, the po­lice have not gone to the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions (DPP) for ad­vice. "Nor­mal­ly, when a per­son is ar­rest­ed and charged, the po­lice go to the DPP for ad­vice. "This means they are hav­ing dif­fi­cul­ty with ev­i­dence as in the case of the 250 peo­ple who were ar­rest­ed re­cent­ly un­der the An­ti-Gang Act," Hinds re­called. "It (the ar­rest of the 16) is like­ly to go nowhere...We'll have to wait and see."

Asked how the re­lease of the 16 with­out charge would im­pact on the cred­i­bil­i­ty of the Gov­ern­ment, Hinds replied: "I don't think the Gov­ern­ment has too much cred­i­bil­i­ty to lose again." Re­call­ing the ar­rest and re­lease of 250 peo­ple un­der the An­ti-Gang Act dur­ing the re­cent state of emer­gency, he said: "In my opin­ion, the Gov­ern­ment's cred­i­bil­i­ty is al­ready at rock bot­tom. "From the time the plot was an­nounced, the en­tire coun­try demon­strat­ed sus­pi­cion and doubt over the sto­ry." Hinds point­ed out that there seemed to be a con­tra­dic­tion in the sto­ry that the plot to as­sas­si­nate the Prime Min­is­ter was linked to the drug trade and the ar­rest of 16 al­leged Mus­lim ter­ror­ists for want­i­ng to desta­bilise the coun­try.

"I don't think they have fur­ther down to go on the totem pole of in­cred­i­bil­i­ty," he said, list­ing a num­ber of cas­es in which the Gov­ern­ment al­leged­ly mis­led the pop­u­la­tion and told un­truths, in­clud­ing the Resh­mi Ram­nar­ine af­fair. Asked about the ori­gin of the mys­te­ri­ous se­cu­ri­ty eval­u­a­tion re­port which found the as­sas­si­na­tion plot against the PM and min­is­ters to be high­ly spec­u­la­tive, Hinds replied: "It came in Op­po­si­tion Leader Dr Kei­th Row­ley's mail­box...He pre­sent­ed the de­tails to the Gov­ern­ment and called on the Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter to chal­lenge its va­lid­i­ty. "So far, we've heard noth­ing from them," he added.

At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Anand Ram­lo­gan said the re­port was not pre­sent­ed to the Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Coun­cil and said it might be fic­ti­tious and bo­gus. Hinds, re­spond­ing, said: "If such a re­port did not go to the Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Coun­cil, that should tell you about the state of the coun­try. He added: "Well, to­day we will know (its va­lid­i­ty), if the de­tainees are re­leased be­cause there was no ev­i­dence to charge them."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored