JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

Promotion dispute at Namdevco

...Resh­mi's moth­er fights for promised post that does not ex­ist

by

20121028

Pre­ma­tee Ram­nar­ine, moth­er of for­mer Se­cu­ri­ty In­tel­li­gence Agency (SSA) head Resh­mi Ram­nar­ine, has been promised a pro­mo­tion to the post of Clerk IV at the Na­tion­al Agri­cul­tur­al Mar­ket­ing and De­vel­op­ment Cor­po­ra­tion (Namde­v­co)-a po­si­tion that does not ex­ist in the es­tab­lish­ment.

Ram­nar­ine, who has more than 25 years' ser­vice, ap­proached the Equal Op­por­tu­ni­ty Com­mis­sion (EOC) last year, claim­ing she had been by­passed for a pro­mo­tion. In a bid to bring a speedy res­o­lu­tion to the mat­ter, for­mer chair­man Robert Ram­samooj agreed to en­ter in­to a vol­un­tary con­cil­i­a­tion me­di­a­tion agree­ment be­tween Namde­v­co and Ram­nar­ine.

T&T Guardian learned it was agreed that Ram­nar­ine, who held the sub­stan­tive post of Clerk I, would be pro­mot­ed to the po­si­tion of Clerk III?ef­fec­tive May 3, 1994, and to Clerk IV ef­fec­tive March 1, 2007. How­ev­er, a year af­ter she went to the EOC, the agreed pro­mo­tion can­not go in­to ef­fect be­cause the po­si­tion of Clerk III is cur­rent­ly filled and the po­si­tion of Clerk IV does not ex­ist.

In the in­ter­im, in­ves­ti­ga­tions re­vealed, man­age­ment took a de­ci­sion to al­low Ram­nar­ine to act as as­sis­tant man­ag­er at the Nor­ris De­onar­ine North­ern Whole­sale Mar­ket in Ma­coya un­til the mat­ter is set­tled. How­ev­er, Ram­nar­ine is in­sist­ing that an agree­ment was en­tered up­on to pro­mote her to Clerk IV.

Ac­cord­ing to the Draft Es­ti­mates of Rev­enue and Ex­pen­di­ture there is no po­si­tion of Clerk IV with­in Namde­v­co. Ques­tioned yes­ter­day on the ba­sis for en­ter­ing in­to such an agree­ment when such a post does not ex­ist, Ram­samooj claimed the agree­ment to set­tle the mat­ter be­tween Namde­v­co and Ram­nar­ine was based on ad­vice from At­tor­ney Gen­er­al (AG) Anand Ram­lo­gan.

"I will ad­mit the mat­ter has not been set­tled...It is a com­plex mat­ter," Ram­samooj said. "It went to the board and the board de­cid­ed to seek the opin­ion of the AG in the mat­ter. The AG sent an opin­ion. The board de­cid­ed to adopt the rec­om­men­da­tion of the AG.

"In sum­ma­ry, it stat­ed we should set­tle the mat­ter. Hav­ing re­ceived the ad­vice from the AG we are now im­ple­ment­ing the ad­vice. I am not an ex­ec­u­tive chair­man, it is on­ly so much I can do." Asked whether Ram­lo­gan was in­formed that the po­si­tion of Clerk IV does not ex­ist in the es­tab­lish­ment, Ram­samooj replied, "Yes, he knew the po­si­tion does not ex­ist. We sub­mit­ted all the fac­tors.

"It is over one year but we could not act on a de­ci­sion be­cause of the com­plex­i­ty. We had to seek ad­vice. We sought ad­vice from a con­sul­tant and the AG. "Things are now be­ing put in place to set­tle to try and set­tle the mat­ter," Ram­samooj said. When the T&T Guardian con­tact­ed Ram­lo­gan yes­ter­day, in­quir­ing whether he was aware the mat­ter had not been set­tled de­spite his ad­vice, he replied, "I have no com­ment to make on that mat­ter."

Promised po­si­tion does not ex­ist at Namde­v­co

Sources at Namde­v­co told the T&T Guardian the hu­man re­sources de­part­ment has tak­en a hands-off ap­proach, while some of the for­mer board mem­bers are al­so dis­tanc­ing them­selves from the mat­ter. The agree­ment be­tween Namde­v­co and Ram­nar­ine has trig­gered out­rage in the or­gan­i­sa­tion, with five oth­er em­ploy­ees now clam­our­ing to be treat­ed sim­i­lar­ly.

The em­ploy­ees, sources said, are al­so mak­ing plans to ap­proach the EOC. "When the prop­er pro­ce­dures are not fol­lowed, this is the end re­sult," a top Namde­v­co of­fi­cial told T&T Guardian. A back­lash, Namde­v­co in­dus­tri­al-re­la­tions con­sul­tant Karan Ma­habirs­ingh said, must be tak­en in­to con­sid­er­a­tion when such agree­ments are be­ing en­tered in­to.

"One must con­sid­er in mak­ing a de­ci­sion, mer­it­ed or oth­er­wise, the im­pli­ca­tions of any such de­ci­sion. My ad­vice was not against the par­tic­u­lar in­di­vid­ual but look­ing at how the move can im­pact oth­er peo­ple," Ma­habirs­ingh told the T&T Guardian in an in­ter­view yes­ter­day.

Ma­habirs­ingh said his role was to en­sure that a so­lu­tion was reached that was ac­cept­able to both par­ties. "One of the con­sid­er­a­tions was the po­si­tion that was promised did not ex­ist in the es­tab­lish­ment. My ad­vice was, you can­not ap­point to a non-ex­is­tent po­si­tion. The po­si­tion of a Clerk IV does not ex­ist.

"I sug­gest­ed that Namde­v­co seek some po­si­tion that may sat­is­fy her needs and at the same time not put the cor­po­ra­tion in a com­pro­mis­ing po­si­tion. "I dis­cov­ered in my con­ver­sa­tion with Namde­v­co of­fi­cials that the ad­vice of the AG was al­so be­ing sought. I said we should await the ad­vice of the AG de­spite my own views on the mat­ter."

How­ev­er, Ma­habirs­ingh said, if Namde­v­co is of the view that ow­ing to an over­sight Ram­nar­ine should be com­pen­sat­ed, it is en­ti­tled to ex­plore oth­er op­tions. "It is not be­yond their ca­pac­i­ty to cre­ate a po­si­tion in or­der to sat­is­fy that re­quire­ment. Of course there is the ne­ces­si­ty for ap­provals to be done," he said.

Namde­v­co gets Oc­to­ber 12 dead­line or else...

Since the agree­ment, Ram­samooj and Ram­nar­ine's rep­re­sen­ta­tive, CEO and man­ag­ing di­rec­tor of Zatopek So­lu­tions Inc Ger­ard Pinard, have been in con­stant com­mu­ni­ca­tion over the mat­ter. Pinard, in an e-mail sent to Ram­samooj on Oc­to­ber 8, ex­pressed his dis­sat­is­fac­tion.

He wrote, "Since your last e-mail com­mu­ni­ca­tion to me on June 15, 2012, my client and I have been wait­ing pa­tient­ly for the re­sults of the promised 'high pri­or­i­ty' that you have as­sured us that you were giv­ing to this long out­stand­ing mat­ter.

"To say that we are ex­treme­ly dis­ap­point­ed at the ap­par­ent in­tran­si­gence of your firm in im­ple­ment­ing the terms of the Vol­un­tary Con­cil­i­a­tion/Me­di­a­tion Agree­ment be­tween Namde­v­co and Mrs Ram­nar­ine, which was en­tered in­to un­der the aus­pices of the EOC more than one year ago, would be a gross un­der­state­ment.

"I would ap­pre­ci­ate your sat­is­fac­to­ry set­tle­ment of this long out­stand­ing is­sue on or be­fore Fri­day Oc­to­ber 12, 2012, fail­ing which my in­struc­tions are to for­mal­ly re­port your firm's non-com­pli­ance to the EOC for their ac­tion as ap­pro­pri­ate. "I have ad­vised my client that she has grounds al­so to pur­sue the mat­ter in the form of a trade dis­pute un­der the In­dus­tri­al Re­la­tions Act Ch. 88:01 should she choose so to do."

In an im­me­di­ate e-mail re­sponse to Pinard, Ram­samooj apol­o­gised for the de­lay. "I am more than sur­prised to now learn that this mat­ter has not come to a fi­nal­i­ty," he went on. "I am shocked that this mat­ter is still out­stand­ing af­ter all the per­son­al ef­forts of the chair­man and the AG's of­fice to have the mat­ter set­tled. I even pi­lot­ed a mo­tion at the board lev­el to have the mat­ter set­tled."

When the T&T Guardian con­tact­ed Pinard yes­ter­day, he con­firmed he was rep­re­sent­ing Ram­nar­ine, but said he could not com­ment at this stage. Ram­nar­ine: Do not ask me my busi­ness Ram­nar­ine, when con­tact­ed, told the T&T Guardian she was not pre­pared to dis­cuss her per­son­al busi­ness.

Asked how she felt about Namde­v­co's fail­ure to pro­mote her de­spite the agree­ment, she replied, "Lis­ten to me. Tell me who gave you the in­for­ma­tion. Who gave you the in­for­ma­tion, ask them the ques­tions. "My per­son­al and of­fi­cial busi­ness does not con­cern the T&T Guardian. Who­ev­er is giv­ing you the in­for­ma­tion...them. Let them an­swer your ques­tions."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored