JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Police statistics for 2013 show: Murder detection rate under 10%

by

20130317

Of the 91 mur­ders for 2013 so far, sta­tis­tics pro­vid­ed by the Po­lice Ser­vice's Crime and Prob­lem Analy­sis Branch (CA­PA) show on­ly eight have been solved.This rep­re­sent­ed a de­tec­tion rate of less than ten per cent.De­tec­tion, says Dana See­ta­hal, SC, means that some­one has been ar­rest­ed and charged for a crime. It doesn't mean the cul­prit has been found guilty in court.

De­spite re­peat­ed ini­tia­tives, there is still pub­lic dis­sat­is­fac­tion over the abil­i­ty of the po­lice to ar­rest crim­i­nals and solve crimes. Last Fri­day, T&T Guardian's colum­nist Gillian Lucky and di­rec­tor of the Po­lice Com­plaints Au­thor­i­ty wrote that the crime sit­u­a­tion had mush­roomed and the suc­ces­sive po­lit­i­cal ad­min­is­tra­tions had failed to build on the work­able crime-fight­ing ini­tia­tives of the pre­vi­ous one.

"For the past five years, I have been track­ing the crime sta­tis­tics that deal with the re­port­ing and de­tec­tion of se­ri­ous and vi­o­lent crimes and, over that pe­ri­od, the fig­ures show that the av­er­age de­tec­tion rate moved from a dis­mal 24 per cent to an abysmal 14 per cent."Ob­vi­ous­ly, there is in­suf­fi­cient re­sort to sci­en­tif­ic means to de­tect crim­i­nals and the ban­dits are way ahead," Lucky wrote.

For­mer min­is­ter in the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Fitzger­ald Hinds said the coun­try con­tin­ued to ex­pe­ri­ence an abysmal de­tec­tion rate. The prob­lem was mul­ti-faceted, and in his view the ma­jor ob­sta­cle is un­trained po­lice.Hinds ac­cused the Po­lice Ser­vice of be­ing "stingy" and "skimpy" when it came to spend­ing mon­ey to send of­fi­cers abroad for train­ing.

"The Po­lice Ser­vice is skimp­ing in terms of in­vest­ment and train­ing of its per­son­nel, es­pe­cial­ly the train­ing need­ed to in­crease the de­tec­tion rate," he said. "Some years ago of­fi­cers used to con­t­a­m­i­nate the very crime scenes they had to in­ves­ti­gate be­cause they were not prop­er­ly trained in gath­er­ing ev­i­dence.

"We now have the Crime Scene In­ves­ti­ga­tions Unit be­cause of­fi­cers have been trained to care­ful­ly comb a crime scene and prop­er­ly gath­er ev­i­dence. But the de­tec­tion rate is still very low."An­oth­er fac­tor in the in­creas­ing­ly low de­tec­tion rate, he says, is the dis­band­ing of the Spe­cial An­ti-Crime Unit (Sautt), which gath­ered in­tel­li­gence on gangs, mur­der sus­pects and or­gan­ised crime.

Lucky, who al­so laud­ed the ef­forts of Sautt, said the or­gan­i­sa­tion fo­cused on best prac­tices in in­ves­ti­ga­tions and the use of tech­nol­o­gy to de­tect the iden­ti­ty of crim­i­nals.The sale of the con­tro­ver­sial blimp, which was bought for US$15 mil­lion and lat­er sold for US$50,000 un­der the Peo­ple's Part­ner­ship gov­ern­ment, al­so dealt a se­vere blow to the po­lice be­ing able to ar­rest crim­i­nals, Hinds said.

"The blimp had a re­al psy­cho­log­i­cal ef­fect on crim­i­nals," he said."They knew some­one was al­ways watch­ing and lis­ten­ing to them. But with that gone, the flood­gate has been opened."He de­scribed the coun­try's coastal ar­eas as a "low fence," as the Gov­ern­ment has not made any ef­fort to fix the 360-de­gree coastal radar sys­tem. It was set up at strate­gic points along the coast to mon­i­tor ves­sels mov­ing in and out of T&T wa­ters, but sev­er­al points along the coast are now blind spots.

When for­mer Works and Trans­port Min­is­ter Jack Warn­er as­sumed the role of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter in Ju­ly last year, he promised the radar sys­tem would be fixed, but this is yet to be done.

Wit­ness pro­tec­tion pro­gramme

A key el­e­ment in solv­ing crime de­pend­ed heav­i­ly on the tes­ti­mo­ny of eye­wit­ness­es, but the coun­try's wit­ness pro­tec­tion pro­gramme, Hinds said, al­so left much to be de­sired.In No­vem­ber 2011, then min­is­ter of jus­tice Her­bert Vol­ney said the min­istry in­tend­ed to up­grade the phys­i­cal in­fra­struc­ture of the pro­gramme.

Speak­ing in Par­lia­ment, Vol­ney said: "Twen­ty-five mil­lion dol­lars is be­ing ex­pend­ed to keep wit­ness­es alive in the wit­ness pro­tec­tion plan. In the last months, we have seen 117 cas­es in­volv­ing vic­tims and their fam­i­lies. Wit­ness­es and their fam­i­lies have to be pro­tect­ed. They don't have phys­i­cal in­fra­struc­ture to deal with that. We are putting in place a mea­sure deal­ing with the next gen­er­a­tion."

Un­der the Jus­tice Pro­tec­tion Act, of­fences which may give rise to pro­tec­tion un­der the pro­gramme in­clude mur­der, manslaugh­ter, pos­ses­sion or use of firearms and am­mu­ni­tion, ag­gra­vat­ed as­sault, shoot­ing or wound­ing, armed rob­bery and ar­son.When Vol­ney was fired in Sep­tem­ber, To­ba­go-born at­tor­ney Christlyn Moore took up the man­tle of Jus­tice Min­is­ter.What has Moore done to im­prove the pro­gramme?"Noth­ing. She is a new­bie with an at­ti­tude," Hinds said.

And in the same breath, Hinds ac­cused so­ci­ety of be­ing "treach­er­ous," say­ing cit­i­zens who de­lib­er­ate­ly turned a blind eye were just as guilty."Cit­i­zens in T&T are very de­ceit­ful, de­cep­tive and sud­den­ly every­body is afraid to give ev­i­dence and do not want to help the po­lice," he said.Pres­i­dent of the Po­lice Ser­vice So­cial and Wel­fare As­so­ci­a­tion act­ing In­sp Anand Rame­sar al­so urged the Gov­ern­ment to re­vamp the pro­gramme to make it more ef­fec­tive.

"Wit­ness­es com­ing for­ward to give ev­i­dence still re­mains a chal­lenge...Ac­cess­ing the pro­gramme still re­mains prob­lem­at­ic as there is a lot of red tape to en­counter," he added.In ad­di­tion, he said, the pub­lic was gen­er­al­ly re­luc­tant to step for­ward to give ev­i­dence, es­pe­cial­ly in mur­der cas­es, be­cause they were afraid for their lives.

"If it is a case in­volv­ing the po­lice, every­body wants to be a wit­ness but out­side of that, if a mur­der hap­pens in Laven­tille, for in­stance, it is ex­treme­ly dif­fi­cult to get wit­ness­es," Rame­sar said."Hence the rea­son why we have such a high num­ber of un­solved mur­ders. Peo­ple pre­tend not to see."

Crime Gang In­tel­li­gence Unit ex­posed

With the re­cent di­rec­tive giv­en by Prime Min­is­ter Ka­mal Per­sad-Bisses­sar for more po­lice to be out on the streets, the Crime Gang In­tel­li­gence Unit, which played a key part in ar­rests, has been com­pro­mised, Rame­sar said.He said the as­so­ci­a­tion was look­ing in­to claims, as re­cent as last week, from mem­bers of the unit that they had been man­dat­ed to be out on pa­trol, a move Rame­sar said had put them in a dan­ger­ous po­si­tion.

"We have got sev­er­al com­plaints from the of­fi­cers, who said they are now ex­posed to crim­i­nals, es­pe­cial­ly in very high-risk ar­eas where they gath­er in­for­ma­tion," he said."This unit has been gath­er­ing in­tel­li­gence on mur­ders, gang-re­lat­ed crimes and oth­er se­ri­ous crimes–and now it seems this has all gone down the drain and it is on­ly ob­vi­ous this move would not lead to any ar­rests."He said there were too many peo­ple in the po­lice who did not have a clue about polic­ing but were giv­ing or­ders.

Foren­sic cen­tre run­ning like a gro­cery

The longer it takes for a body to be brought to the Foren­sic Sci­ence Cen­tre in St James, the high­er the chances of ev­i­dence be­ing tam­pered with or lost and there­fore the less like­ly it is that the case will be solved, said pathol­o­gist Dr Valery Alexan­drov.

Alexan­drov, who has worked ex­ten­sive­ly in the US, Eu­rope and the Mid­dle East, said he had nev­er en­coun­tered a foren­sic fa­cil­i­ty any­where else which opened at 9 am and closed at 4 pm. In­ter­na­tion­al foren­sic cen­tres, he said, opened 24 hours a day so that the bod­ies could be processed and the au­top­sies done im­me­di­ate­ly.

As it is, he said: "The lat­est we would re­ceive a body at the Foren­sic Sci­ence Cen­tre would be 3 pm. We can­not store bod­ies, be­cause our two fridges are filled with uniden­ti­fied bod­ies."When the cen­tre is closed, in the in­ter­im the bod­ies are kept at the Port-of-Spain and San Fer­nan­do Gen­er­al hos­pi­tals and the Er­ic Williams Med­ical Sci­ences Com­plex, Mt Hope–and be­tween that time when the bod­ies leave those places and fi­nal­ly come to the cen­tre, a num­ber of things could hap­pen," Alexan­drov said.

He rec­om­mend­ed that a Na­tion­al Miss­ing and Uniden­ti­fied Per­sons Sys­tem, which is used in the US, should be im­ple­ment­ed. The sys­tem nar­rows down the search by us­ing phys­i­cal char­ac­ter­is­tics or oth­er spe­cif­ic in­for­ma­tion about the per­son, such as den­tal records.In T&T an au­top­sy can on­ly be done once the body is iden­ti­fied by rel­a­tives. Even for the body to be ex­am­ined by a pathol­o­gist for iden­ti­fi­ca­tion marks such as scars and tat­toos, fam­i­ly mem­bers must iden­ti­fy it.

Alexan­drov said at present there were 15 uniden­ti­fied bod­ies at the cen­tre."We can­not touch them be­cause no one has stepped for­ward to iden­ti­fy them. If the law was dif­fer­ent and we could have done au­top­sies on non-iden­ti­fied bod­ies, that would have al­so helped solve many cas­es."

De­tec­tion rate could be bet­ter

Train­ing, es­pe­cial­ly in the field of tech­nol­o­gy, is a top pri­or­i­ty of the Po­lice Ser­vice, said Deputy Po­lice Com­mis­sion­er in charge of crime Mervyn Richard­son.He ad­mit­ted he was not sat­is­fied with the cur­rent de­tec­tion rate."But we have been do­ing things to bring it down," he said."We have sent away of­fi­cers for train­ing, we are us­ing more and more tech­nol­o­gy, we are us­ing DNA, we are us­ing CCTV cam­eras and our in­tel­li­gence gath­er­ing is be­com­ing bet­ter."

Ap­peal­ing for the pub­lic's co-op­er­a­tion in solv­ing crimes, Richard­son agreed the Po­lice Ser­vice still en­coun­tered the prob­lem of wit­ness­es re­fus­ing to come for­ward."We don't get the pub­lic sup­port in that area...Wit­ness­es and in some cas­es the vic­tims are not will­ing to come for­ward due to fear of reprisal," he said."If peo­ple are not will­ing to come for­ward we will not have a good de­tec­tion rate."Asked if he was sat­is­fied with the per­for­mance of his charges, Richard­son said there was al­ways room for im­prove­ment.

"I am not hap­py with the de­tec­tion rate, it is a chal­lenge. But we are see­ing a greater ef­fort by all of our of­fi­cers," he said.Richard­son said it would be dif­fi­cult to com­pare T&T's de­tec­tion rate with oth­er coun­tries be­cause each coun­try had a dif­fer­ent pop­u­la­tion fig­ure.

Box: De­tec­tion rate in oth­er coun­tries

Alexan­drov said the UK, with a pop­u­la­tion of about 60 mil­lion peo­ple, had a mur­der de­tec­tion rate of close to 75 per cent.In the US, with a pop­u­la­tion of 312 mil­lion, there was a de­tec­tion rate of close to 72 per cent.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored