JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, May 23, 2025

FBI probe story about Warner and son, PM to wait and see

by

20130327

Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar is seek­ing of­fi­cial cor­rob­o­ra­tion of the in­for­ma­tion in the Reuters FBI probe sto­ry in which Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter Jack Warn­er and his son Daryan are men­tioned, ac­cord­ing to the PM's of­fice.This state­ment was is­sued yes­ter­day af­ter­noon by the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter (OPM) in re­sponse to queries about the in­ter­na­tion­al Reuters sto­ry, head­lined "FBI has co-op­er­at­ing wit­ness for soc­cer fraud probe: sources."

The news re­port by jour­nal­ist Mark Ho­sen­ball said an FBI probe in­to al­leged cor­rup­tion in in­ter­na­tion­al soc­cer had "re­cent­ly in­ten­si­fied af­ter in­ves­ti­ga­tors per­suad­ed a key par­ty to be a co-op­er­at­ing wit­ness."The ar­ti­cle quot­ed US law-en­force­ment sources.The sto­ry claimed the wit­ness was Daryan Warn­er, son of Warn­er, a for­mer Fi­fa vice-pres­i­dent. The sources re­port­ed­ly de­clined to dis­cuss the role of Daryan Warn­er fur­ther. The sto­ry said they did not iden­ti­fy who might be charged, if any­body, or when.

It al­so claimed: "While the ex­act scope of the in­ves­ti­ga­tion is not clear, among the mat­ters un­der scruti­ny are two pre­vi­ous­ly re­port­ed al­le­ga­tions in­volv­ing Jack Warn­er who is T&T's Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter."The OPM's state­ment quot­ed the Prime Min­is­ter as say­ing she "will not re­ly on pub­lished re­ports in the me­dia but will again seek to get of­fi­cial cor­rob­o­ra­tion of the in­for­ma­tion now in the pub­lic do­main be­fore mak­ing any de­ter­mi­na­tion or pro­nounce­ment."

Gov­ern­ment sources said it was ex­pect­ed some in­for­ma­tion would be ob­tained on the sto­ry by to­day's Cab­i­net meet­ing.Asked about the ar­ti­cle yes­ter­day, Warn­er's ad­vis­er Fran­cis Joseph said the min­is­ter had not seen it yet and was in a meet­ing. He said Warn­er had been in touch with his son every day.The UNC hi­er­ar­chy yes­ter­day re­mained mum on the re­port on its chair­man.

UNC deputy leader Su­ruj Ram­bachan said while he had seen the sto­ry, he was not in a po­si­tion to re­spond. "I think the par­ty has to prop­er­ly re­spond," he added.UNC deputy leader Roodal Mooni­lal re­spond­ed to a texted re­quest for com­ment with the mes­sage: "No com­ment." At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Anand Ram­lo­gan al­so did not re­spond.

COP speaks

The COP is al­so seek­ing facts on the Reuters sto­ry, says COP chair­man Car­olyn Seep­er­sad- Bachan.COP leader Prakash Ra­mad­har is on va­ca­tion un­til April 13, his sec­re­tari­at said yes­ter­day. While the COP has a par­ty prin­ci­ple that se­nior mem­bers un­der a cloud of al­le­ga­tion or probe should step aside from any of­fice, Seep­er­sad-Bachan said the Reuters sto­ry had to be ver­i­fied first and more de­tails ob­tained be­fore COP could com­ment:

She added: "We do not have the facts. If there's any in­ves­ti­ga­tion, we need to ver­i­fy that. We have to get the facts first and as­cer­tain if there's an in­ves­ti­ga­tion and the oth­er side has to be heard be­fore we make any pro­nounce­ment."For­mer COP vice chair­man Ver­non de Li­ma said: "COP's po­si­tion is and al­ways has been: Mr Warn­er should not be a Cab­i­net mem­ber un­til such time as he is clear of any or all al­le­ga­tions against him.

"In my view he should have stopped be­ing in Cab­i­net two years ago when is­sues first arose and we in COP sug­gest­ed that. We fore­saw at the time there could have been com­pli­ca­tions."De Li­ma added: "He's ful­ly en­ti­tled to have his side of the sto­ry heard and I am hold­ing to the po­si­tion I have al­ways held: That I am con­fi­dent Mr Warn­er will short­ly vis­it the US and clear up any al­le­ga­tions that may be spu­ri­ous. It's on­ly fair to him."

PNM wants an­swers

No less than a prime min­is­te­r­i­al ex­pla­na­tion will suf­fice on the Reuters sto­ry, says the Op­po­si­tion PNM."It may be a case of 'we told you so,' and so the Prime Min­is­ter must clear the air on this in­ter­na­tion­al re­port where one of our min­is­ter is men­tioned and she must say if there is va­lid­i­ty in it," said PNM sen­a­tor Fitzger­ald Hinds yes­ter­day.

Call­ing for Gov­ern­ment's view, Hinds added: "We know Mr Warn­er's sons are in the US and have not re­turned to T&T in a long time and we are now hear­ing of this (Reuters re­port). It's clear­ly se­ri­ous."If it's true, then the in­ter­na­tion­al em­bar­rass­ment in this will be laid at the feet of the Prime Min­is­ter as it was on her au­thor­i­ty min­is­ters were ap­point­ed."

Hinds added: "I call on the Prime Min­is­ter to tell us what is the state of af­fairs re­gard­ing her min­is­ter, who we said ought not to have been min­is­ter in the first place. She ap­point­ed him and de­fend­ed him so she must ex­plain now."He said he al­so want­ed an­swers from the act­ing Po­lice Com­mis­sion­er on his call for scruti­ny of bribery al­le­ga­tions con­cern­ing the al­leged CFU is­sue at the Hy­att in 2011. Hinds said an in­ves­ti­ga­tor was as­signed to probe Con­ca­caf deal­ings as far back as they could look.

"But we've had no feed­back from the act­ing Po­lice Com­mis­sion­er on this," he added.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored