JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, May 23, 2025

Seetahal: Time to act on false CV info

by

20130702

Se­nior Coun­sel Dana See­ta­hal is un­sure whether there is any of­fence which can deal with fal­si­fy­ing in­for­ma­tion on some­one's re­sume.She said, how­ev­er, that giv­en the pop­u­lar­i­ty of the act, maybe it was time to look at leg­is­la­tion to make it a pun­ish­able of­fence.See­ta­hal was re­spond­ing to ques­tions on whether or not for­mer Air­ports Au­thor­i­ty of T&T (AATT) deputy chair­man Kurt Ajod­ha could be charged with fal­si­fy­ing in­for­ma­tion on his re­sume.

Ajod­ha's aca­d­e­m­ic qual­i­fi­ca­tions were ques­tioned by Diego Mar­tin North/East MP Colm Im­bert dur­ing de­bate in Par­lia­ment last month.Im­bert had said Ajod­ha did not pos­sess the qual­i­fi­ca­tions stat­ed on his CV. Fol­low­ing this, Ajod­ha re­signed from his po­si­tion with AATT."If he had fal­si­fied a cer­tifi­cate, it would have been a fraud of­fence but I don't know that there is any of­fence he can be charged with for putting in­cor­rect in­for­ma­tion on his CV," See­ta­hal said.

She said un­der in­dus­tri­al law if he had ap­plied for a job and put false cre­den­tials and it had been found out then he could have been fired.See­ta­hal said con­sid­er­ing the preva­lence, it may be time to look at leg­is­la­tion to ad­dress giv­ing false in­for­ma­tion on a re­sume.At­tor­ney Is­rael Khan was al­so un­sure whether putting false claims on one's re­sume was a crim­i­nal of­fence."A lot of peo­ple put false in­for­ma­tion on their re­sume but no one has been charged with any­thing," Khan said.

Uni­ver­si­ty of the West In­dies (UWI) Cam­pus Reg­is­trar Richard Saun­ders said the uni­ver­si­ty did not seek to pros­e­cute peo­ple for say­ing that they at­tend­ed the in­sti­tu­tion."If an em­ploy­er calls, we can val­i­date the claim and that is as far as it goes," he added.In Feb­ru­ary, Dr Hafi­zo­ol Ali Mo­hammed, one of the com­mis­sion­ers ap­point­ed to sit on the com­mis­sion of en­quiry in­to the 1990 coup at­tempt, ad­mit­ted his cur­ricu­lum vi­tae con­tained in­ac­cu­ra­cies af­ter a re­port in the T&T Guardian.

In 2011, Resh­mi Ram­nar­ine re­signed af­ter her qual­i­fi­ca­tions for the post of di­rec­tor of the Se­cu­ri­ty In­tel­li­gence Agency came in­to ques­tion.Cor­po­rate com­mu­ni­ca­tions of­fi­cer of the AATT Her­tia Fon­cette said the au­thor­i­ty had no com­ment on the is­sue.Asked if the Trans­port Min­istry would be tak­ing ac­tion against Ajod­ha, Min­is­ter Chan­dresh Shar­ma said no breach had been com­mit­ted.

"He was nev­er an em­ploy­ee. As a re­sult, he can­not be pe­nalised as an em­ploy­ee," Shar­ma said.As an ex­am­ple, Shar­ma said: "If you are a jour­nal­ist and you al­so cook and you put on your re­sume that you are a cook, you can­not be pe­nalised for that."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored