JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, April 3, 2025

Licks for Lyndira

by

20131113

In­de­pen­dent Lib­er­al Par­ty (ILP) in­ter­im deputy po­lit­i­cal leader Lyn­di­ra Ou­dit was dealt some heavy blows by class­mates of ex­pelled ILP coun­cil­lor Faaiq Mo­hammed at a po­lit­i­cal fo­rum at the Uni­ver­si­ty of the West In­dies (UWI), St Au­gus­tine, yes­ter­day.

Mo­hammed, a UWI stu­dent and win­ning can­di­date in the Oc­to­ber 21 lo­cal gov­ern­ment elec­tions, was ex­pelled by the ILP af­ter he vot­ed against the par­ty and threw in his sup­port with the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC), end­ing the dead­lock in the Ch­agua­nas Bor­ough Cor­po­ra­tion that re­sult­ed from a tie in the elec­tions.

Mo­hammed was sev­er­ly rep­ri­mand­ed by ILP leader Jack Warn­er af­ter his de­ci­sion and was al­so ac­cused of ac­cept­ing $2.5 mil­lion to switch al­le­giance. He sub­se­quent­ly said he feared for his life af­ter that and there were re­ports the ILP went on a smear cam­paign against him and al­leged­ly threat­ened him.At yes­ter­day's fo­rum, a young man went to the mi­cro­phone dur­ing the time al­lot­ed for par­tic­i­pants to ask ques­tions.

He blunt­ly asked Ou­dit why had the ILP dam­aged the rep­u­ta­tion of Mo­hammed, his fel­low stu­dent, by dri­ving through his Char­lieville home­town with a mi­cro­phone and re­port­ed­ly call­ing him a trai­tor, among oth­er re­port­ed at­tacks.The young man said he was dis­ap­point­ed with the ILP for at­tack­ing a young per­son in such a man­ner.He was ap­plaud­ed by a small group af­ter his con­tri­bu­tion.

Re­spond­ing to the con­dem­na­tion, Ou­dit said Mo­hammed's mosque put for­ward his name as a can­di­date and he was screened by the ILP ex­ec­u­tive."He went straight up to the elec­tion, which he won, and at no time did he iden­ti­fy any­thing (that both­ered him)," she said.Ou­dit, how­ev­er, de­nied the ILP brought Mo­hammed's char­ac­ter in­to dis­re­pute."At no time was his char­ac­ter brought in­to dis­re­pute. Mem­bers of his com­mu­ni­ty were very up­set. The ILP went once with a mike to in­form them (of what tran­spired)."

How­ev­er, an­oth­er young man from the au­di­ence in­ter­rupt­ed Ou­dit by shout­ing out some­thing about a "pre-ac­tion pro­to­col let­ter."Mo­hammed, 25, an in­ter­na­tion­al re­la­tions stu­dent at UWI, has sent a pre-ac­tion pro­to­col let­ter to Warn­er call­ing for an apol­o­gy for defam­a­to­ry state­ments made against him. Mo­hammed, who said his com­mu­ni­ty sup­port­ed him, al­so wants dam­ages.

He said he vot­ed against the ILP in the in­ter­est of his com­mu­ni­ty. He said his burgess­es had is­sues with the rep­re­sen­ta­tion of for­mer UNC can­di­date Fal­isha Isa­hak, who was sub­se­quent­ly put up as an al­der­man by the ILP. He said af­ter a pe­ti­tion he had with more 600 sig­na­ture was dis­re­gard­ed by the par­ty, he de­cid­ed to with­hold his sup­port of the ILP as a form of protest.Ear­li­er, Ou­dit looked un­com­fort­able while po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist Dr Sel­wyn Ryan wad­ed in­to the ILP and Warn­er.

Ryan said the ILP was a pick­up side and Warn­er is 70, an age when he should be look­ing for a spe­cial kind of in­sur­ance.Ou­dit was part of a fo­rum on the re­cent elec­tions in T&T and their im­pli­ca­tions for na­tion­al pol­i­tics.Be­side her at the head ta­ble were UNC deputy po­lit­i­cal leader Dr Roodal Mooni­lal, PNM PRO Faris Al-Rawi and Ryan.Re­spond­ing to ques­tions on whether the ILP split the votes in the lo­cal gov­ern­ment elec­tions, caus­ing the PNM to win by de­fault, Ou­dit said yes.

"The votes were, in fact, split in the Oc­to­ber 21 lo­cal gov­ern­ment elec­tions, but not in the No­vem­ber 4 St Joseph elec­tions," she said."If you look at the num­bers in the lo­cal gov­ern­ment elec­tions, whether you call it split­ting or not, the com­bined votes of the op­po­si­tion–the UNC, COP and ILP–would have de­feat­ed the PNM."This split was not ev­i­dent in St Joseph, how­ev­er, which the PNM al­so won. Ou­dit blamed low vot­er turnout for that."A lot of the float­ing or in­de­pen­dent vot­ers held back in this elec­tion," she said.

Ou­dit said she did not sub­scribe to the gen­er­al de­f­i­n­i­tion of split votes. Peo­ple just made their own choic­es, she said.Asked by the T&T Guardian if she planned to stay with the ILP, de­scribed by po­lit­i­cal an­a­lysts as hav­ing lost mo­men­tum, Ou­dit in­di­cat­ed she was stay­ing put."It's far more im­por­tant to help build a sus­tain­able par­ty," she said.A con­sti­tu­tion is to be rat­i­fied and the par­ty is prepar­ing a man­i­festo, she said.A po­lit­i­cal al­liance was not ruled out by the ILP, she said. The ques­tion was with whom.

"The PNM is the on­ly par­ty that has re­mained by it­self," she not­ed, giv­ing a hint.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored