JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, April 4, 2025

Alexander loses defamation case - ordered to pay Gabriel $775,000

by

Sampson Nanton
2165 days ago
20190501
Businessman Andrew gabriel (left) and PEP political leader Phillip Alexander (right).

Businessman Andrew gabriel (left) and PEP political leader Phillip Alexander (right).

SAMP­SON NAN­TON

The High Court has or­dered po­lit­i­cal leader of the Peo­ple's Em­pow­er­ment Par­ty (PEP), Phillip Alexan­der, to pay $775,000 in dam­ages to busi­ness­man and PNM fi­nancier An­drew Gabriel fol­low­ing a defama­tion law­suit.

Gabriel sued Alexan­der for defama­tion based on state­ments made on Alexan­der's Face­book page and on his ra­dio pro­gramme.

Alexan­der ac­cused Gabriel and his wife of ben­e­fit­ting fi­nan­cial­ly from their con­nec­tions to the rul­ing Peo­ple's Na­tion­al Move­ment.

Alexan­der ar­gued that his state­ments were cov­ered by the free­dom of ex­pres­sion and the me­dia, as well as the right to the ex­pres­sion of po­lit­i­cal views,

Gabriel said he and his fam­i­ly, in­clud­ing his wife and chil­dren suf­fered men­tal an­guish from Alexan­der's con­stant at­tacks.

Af­ter Gabriel warned Alexan­der about his state­ments, he ramped up his at­tacks and even in­vit­ed the pub­lic to send him any dam­ag­ing in­for­ma­tion about Gabriel, his busi­ness and his fam­i­ly.

Jus­tice Car­ol Gob­in said that even though Alexan­der de­scribed his at­tacks as "rants", he seemed un­re­pen­tant about his scan­dalous claims.

"The case on­ly con­firms the lim­its of two im­por­tant con­sti­tu­tion­al rights, the right to free­dom of ex­pres­sion and the right to ex­pres­sion of po­lit­i­cal views and it has long been es­tab­lished that these rights are not ab­solute," she said.

"They do not trump the law of defama­tion. This is a defama­tion ac­tion plain and sim­ple," she added.

Jus­tice Gob­in's award is a re­minder that Trinidad and To­ba­go's com­menters on Face­book and oth­er plat­forms are not im­mune from be­ing sued for dam­ages.

Dur­ing the case, Alexan­der, who de­scribed him­self as a jour­nal­ist, claimed that his state­ments were made "on an oc­ca­sion of qual­i­fied priv­i­lege".

Gob­in sug­gest­ed that Alexan­der's de­fence was flawed.

"His state­ments were based on ru­mours, as­sump­tions, pub­lic per­cep­tion and his own ob­ser­va­tions which have re­mained a mys­tery," she said.

Jus­tice Gob­in award­ed Gabriel gen­er­al dam­ages of $525,000 and ag­gra­vat­ed dam­ages of $250,000, for a to­tal of $775,000.

Alexan­der has al­so been or­dered to pay Gabriel's le­gal fees.Jus­tice Gob­in award­ed Gabriel gen­er­al dam­ages of $525,000 and ag­gra­vat­ed dam­ages of $250,000, for a to­tal of $775,000.

Alexan­der has al­so been or­dered to pay Gabriel's le­gal fees but he has sig­naled his de­ci­sion to chal­lenge the rul­ing.

"We, of course, dis­agree with the judge’s in­ter­pre­ta­tion of the facts and we have sig­naled our in­ten­tion to ap­peal," he said.

Asked whether this will af­fect his ac­tions on so­cial me­dia, Alexan­der said he was an ac­tivist and “the out­come of this mat­ter will in no way de­ter my mis­sion".

"I am will­ing to go as far as it takes to prove this was not defama­tion," he said.

Gabriel, mean­while, said he felt vin­di­cat­ed.

"This is a vin­di­ca­tion for my­self and my fam­i­ly who have been sav­aged by fake news and mal­ice that was rec­og­nized in judg­ment," he said, adding, "I am sat­is­fied with the rul­ing."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored