JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, March 17, 2025

Appointment of Gary Griffith as acting CoP null and void

by

1249 days ago
20211014
Gary Griffith.

Gary Griffith.

For the first time since In­de­pen­dence, this coun­try will tem­porar­i­ly be with­out a Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice. De­liv­er­ing a 58-page judge­ment, a short while ago, High Court Judge Na­dia Kan­ga­loo up­held an in­ter­pre­ta­tion law­suit from so­cial ac­tivist Ravi Bal­go­b­in Ma­haraj, in which he (Ma­haraj) claimed that the Po­lice Ser­vice Com­mis­sion need­ed the ap­proval of the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives to make act­ing and sub­stan­tive ap­point­ments for the Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice and Deputy Com­mis­sion­ers of Po­lice (DCPs). 

Kan­ga­loo’s de­ci­sion in the case ef­fec­tive­ly in­val­i­dat­ed the act­ing ap­point­ment giv­en to for­mer po­lice com­mis­sion­er Gary Grif­fith af­ter his three-year stint in the post end­ed in mid-Au­gust. It al­so in­val­i­dat­ed the act­ing ap­point­ment giv­en to DCP Mc­Don­ald Ja­cob af­ter Grif­fith went on leave and was tem­porar­i­ly sus­pend­ed by the Com­mis­sion due to its probe in­to the is­su­ing of firearm user’s li­cens­es (FULs). 

Even if Ma­haraj’s law­suit was dis­missed, Ja­cob would not have been able to con­tin­ue the post while Grif­fith re­mained on leave pend­ing the com­ple­tion of the probe, as per his (Grif­fith) set­tle­ment with the Com­mis­sion over the sus­pen­sion, as Ja­cob’s act­ing ap­point­ment was due to end at mid­night tonight. 

The ap­point­ment of a new act­ing com­mis­sion­er un­der the process af­firmed by Jus­tice Kan­ga­loo can on­ly be­gin af­ter the Com­mis­sion is re­con­sti­tut­ed. The com­mis­sion is cur­rent­ly mem­ber­less as even though re­tired Jus­tice of Ap­peal Ju­dith Jones and con­sul­tant Max­ine At­tong were nom­i­nat­ed, ear­li­er this week, they still re­quire Par­lia­men­tary ap­proval to be ap­point­ed. 

While un­der the Con­sti­tu­tion, the Com­mis­sion con­sists of a Chair­man and four mem­bers, de­ci­sions can be tak­en with a quo­rum of three. The Com­mis­sion is cur­rent­ly barred from com­plet­ing the process of se­lect­ing a list of can­di­dates for the sub­stan­tive post, to be ap­proved by Par­lia­ment, based on an in­junc­tion ob­tained by act­ing Se­nior Supt Anand Rame­sar. He is chal­leng­ing the de­ci­sion of the for­mer Com­mis­sion mem­bers to not se­lect him to move on to the in­ter­view stage of their re­cruit­ment process. That in­junc­tion re­mains in place un­til Rame­sar’s law­suit comes up for hear­ing be­fore Jus­tice Joan Charles in two weeks’ time. 

Ma­haraj was rep­re­sent­ed by Anand Ram­lo­gan, SC, Renu­ka Ramb­ha­jan, Jayan­ti Lutch­me­di­al, Jared Ja­groo, Natasha Bis­ram, and Vishaal Siewsaran. The AG’s Of­fice was rep­re­sent­ed by Dou­glas Mendes, SC, Rishi Dass, and Te­nille Ramkissoon. Se­nior Coun­sel Rus­sell Mar­tineau led the Com­mis­sion’s le­gal team, while Lar­ry Lal­la rep­re­sent­ed Grif­fith. 

Re­porter: Derek Achong


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored