The Belize government has described as “unjust and procedurally unfair” the decision of the European Union (EU) to its list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.
The EU Tuesday named Belize and Antigua and Barbuda as the latest Caribbean Community (CARICOM) countries to its list. In addition, the EU also named Seychelles to the list, while at the same time removing the British Virgin Islands (BVI), Costa Rica and Marshall Islands from the list.
The EU said that apart from the new additions, the other Caribbean countries included in its 16 non-cooperative jurisdictions are Anguilla, Bahamas, Trinidad and Tobago, Turks and Caicos Islands.
“The Council regrets that these jurisdictions are not yet cooperative on tax matters and invites them to improve their legal framework in order to resolve the identified issues,” the EU said in a statement.
But in a statement, Belmopan said it “rejects as false the designation of Belize by the EU as a “non-cooperative jurisdiction for tax purposes.
“The Government of Belize views this “automatic” listing of Belize on the Annex I list as unjust and procedurally unfair, which leads to erroneous conclusions being drawn about Belize’s commitment to work with its global partners in establishing a modern and fair international tax framework.”
The government said that before taking its decision, the EU failed to engage Belize on the matter.
“The decision was, therefore, arbitrary and contrary to past practice by the EU. Had the EU engaged with Belize, the EU would have learnt of the significant steps Belize has already taken to address the identified deficiencies that led to the PC rating in the Exchange of Information on Request (EOIR) peer review.”
Belize said that it has an “unshakeable” commitment to the transparency of its tax and regulatory framework, as well as, to establish an effective regime for the exchange of information for tax matters.
“In fulfilling this commitment, Belize has made substantial amendments to its laws and practices to better align with international standards. Critical elements of this legal reform include the initiatives of the government to modernize the company law framework, enhance the enforcement powers and ability of competent authorities in Belize to access and obtain information when requested, and put in place the appropriate oversight, administrative and human resources required to ensure effective and efficient compliance with the EOIR standard.
Belize said more specifically, prior to the conclusion of the EOIR peer review assessment, the Government enacted legislation to further enhance the country’s legal framework to better align with the 2016 EOIR standard, particularly relating to the availability of beneficial ownership and identity information on all relevant entities and arrangements, as well as the availability of accounting information.
“Deficiencies around these two elements identified by the assessment team (prior to the enactment of such legislation) were the factors that contributed to Belize’s PC rating. The PC rating, received on a third element with respect to “quality and timeliness of responses,” was also related to the legal framework around beneficial ownership information and accounting records, which have now been fully addressed. These legislative changes enable the relevant competent authority in Belize to access the relevant information thus remedying the deficiencies identified in the EOIR peer review report.
“In short, the listing of Belize is based on outdated information and a disregard of these numerous legislative changes.”
The government said that the EU has further informed Belize that if in the coming months, the GF receives and accepts a request by Belize to open a supplementary review of Belize’s compliance with the EOIR standard, then Belize would be removed from the Annex I list.
“The Government of Belize again underscores that if there had been engagement with Belize, the EU would have been informed that Belize fully intends to submit such a request for a supplementary review at the earliest opportunity.
“The earliest time that Belize can request a supplementary review is one year post the publication of EOIR peer review report. In this respect, the Government of Belize unequivocally states that it intends to submit a request for a supplementary review by July 2024 and, if permitted, before that date.”
The government said that given these facts, it wrote to the EU on October 2, this year, requesting that it revisit the decision to list Belize on the Annex I list, which based on the actions taken shows that, by all objective criteria, Belize has fully addressed the deficiencies identified in the EOIR peer review report.
“To not do so flies in the face of due process and the EU has yet again, unfairly and erroneously labelled Belize as a “non-cooperative tax jurisdiction. Indeed, the so-called “automatic” nature of the EU process can be best characterised as non-consultative, inflexible and insensitive to the circumstances of small, highly vulnerable states such as Belize.
“ The Government of Belize notes that save for the listing of the Russian Federation, the EU Annex I list only contains small and vulnerable countries like Belize yet fails to include any EU member state which has received a PC rating by the Global Forum on Tax Transparency and Exchange of Information (GF).
“The EU’s “listing” process is devoid of the values of shared responsibility, mutual respect, accountability, fairness, and solidarity that underpin Belize’s relations with the EU and its member states,” the Belize government said, reaffirming “its commitment to working with its global partners to establish a modern fair international tax framework”.
BELMOPAN, Belize, Oct 18, CMC
CMC/gi/ir/2023