JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, March 16, 2025

Businessman sues WASA over faulty sewer pipeline

by

18 days ago
20250226
Justice Frank Seepersad

Justice Frank Seepersad

Se­nior Re­porter

derek.achong@guardian.co.tt

A San Juan busi­ness­man will have to wait a lit­tle over a week to learn the out­come of his law­suit over dam­age to his busi­ness al­leged­ly caused by a faulty sew­er pipeline.

High Court Judge Frank Seep­er­sad re­served judg­ment in Matthew Ed­wards’ case against the Wa­ter and Sew­er­age Au­thor­i­ty (WASA) to next week Thurs­day af­ter pre­sid­ing over a tri­al at the Wa­ter­front Ju­di­cial Cen­tre in Port-of-Spain yes­ter­day morn­ing.

In his law­suit, Ed­wards, who op­er­ates a store sell­ing pi­rat­ed DVDs, com­put­er parts, toys and ice cream at a rent­ed build­ing in San Juan, claimed the is­sue with WASA’s sew­er pipeline arose in late Oc­to­ber 2021 when he no­ticed wa­ter and sew­er­age over­flow­ing from the toi­let at the prop­er­ty.

He ini­tial­ly be­lieved the toi­let was clogged and sought to rec­ti­fy it us­ing a rub­ber plunger. He said his land­lord came to his as­sis­tance af­ter his at­tempts to stop the flow failed.

They even­tu­al­ly cut the PVC pipe con­nect­ing the build­ing’s sew­er sys­tem to the WASA sew­er pipeline which runs un­der­ground along the East­ern Main Road.

Ed­wards claimed that his busi­ness suf­fered sig­nif­i­cant dam­age as it was flood­ed with sewage be­fore he and his land­lord were able to im­ple­ment the tem­po­rary so­lu­tion. He said he and his land­lord made sev­er­al re­ports to WASA but the au­thor­i­ty’s staff took more than a month to re­spond and re­pair the is­sue, which he claimed em­anat­ed from its pipeline.

Ed­wards claimed that he lost al­most $60,000 in stock and spent al­most $3,000 clean­ing the busi­ness. He al­so claimed that he lost out on over $20,000 in prof­its as he was forced to close his busi­ness for 45 days be­fore the sit­u­a­tion with the sew­er pipeline was ad­dressed by WASA.

He con­tend­ed that WASA was neg­li­gent in fail­ing to pe­ri­od­i­cal­ly in­spect and main­tain the pipeline and in its de­lay in rec­ti­fy­ing the is­sue.

Ed­wards main­tained his claims about his busi­ness be­ing flood­ed even af­ter be­ing shown pho­tographs he sup­plied af­ter the flood had al­leged­ly sub­sided.

WASA’s lawyer Kirk Ben­gochea point­ed out that box­es con­tain­ing stuffed an­i­mals which were on the ground did not ap­pear to be wa­ter­logged. He al­so asked why Ed­wards had not tak­en pho­tographs of the flood­ed busi­ness.

In its de­fence, WASA ad­mit­ted that the over­flow was due to a col­lapse in its sew­er in­fra­struc­ture but de­nied any wrong­do­ing as it claimed that it has a prop­er and ad­e­quate main­te­nance pro­gramme.

“The sew­er­age over­flow oc­curred not as a re­sult of a fail­ure to main­tain the pipeline but be­cause of the age of the sew­er­age in­fra­struc­ture along the East­ern Main Road in Pe­tit Bourg,” it said.

WASA’s sew­er sys­tems man­ag­er Ter­ron Cob­ham, who su­per­vised the ini­tial site vis­it and the even­tu­al re­pairs, ad­mit­ted that he and his col­league’s re­sponse was de­layed as at the time they were en­gaged in a ma­jor project to reroute wa­ter main pipelines in Beetham Gar­dens.

“The de­fen­dant pri­ori­tis­es jobs ac­cord­ing to the or­der in which the re­ports are made or the sever­i­ty of the job. In this in­stance, WASA was man­dat­ed to at­tend to the Beetham Gar­dens re­pairs which had to take pri­or­i­ty as the trunk main had col­lapsed,” Cob­ham said.

He con­firmed that the over­flow was most like­ly due to WASA’s faulty sew­er pipeline.

“Based on my 20 years of ex­pe­ri­ence, I be­lieve that it is pos­si­ble that the claimant’s line at the point of con­nec­tion be­came dam­aged due to the de­fen­dant’s aged main and the ef­fect of the sew­er gas­es over an ex­tend­ed pe­ri­od,” Cob­ham said.

While be­ing cross-ex­am­ined by Ed­wards’ lawyer Javier For­rester, Cob­ham ex­plained that the lifes­pan of sew­er lines could be af­fect­ed by an in­crease in the pop­u­la­tion of an area and the in­tro­duc­tion of restau­rants.

He said he and his col­leagues pe­ri­od­i­cal­ly check on the sew­er pipelines but ad­mit­ted that WASA did not have a pro­ce­dure for chang­ing main­te­nance sched­ules based on pop­u­la­tion in­creas­es.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored