JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

Catching COVID more than once: What we know about reinfections

by

1112 days ago
20220209
People wearing protective masks to help curb the spread of the coronavirus wait for a traffic light at an intersection in Tokyo [File: Eugene Hoshiko/AP Photo]

People wearing protective masks to help curb the spread of the coronavirus wait for a traffic light at an intersection in Tokyo [File: Eugene Hoshiko/AP Photo]

Since the emer­gence of the Omi­cron vari­ant of the coro­n­avirus, cas­es of COVID re­in­fec­tions are be­com­ing more com­mon.

By Eliz­a­beth Me­limopou­los-Al­jazeera

As the Omi­cron vari­ant of the coro­n­avirus dri­ves new waves of COVID in­fec­tions around the world, some ear­ly stud­ies ap­pear to show the risk of re­in­fec­tion has risen.

Ac­cord­ing to an analy­sis by the Unit­ed King­dom’s Of­fice for Na­tion­al Sta­tis­tics (ONS), the risk of re­in­fec­tion is 16 times high­er when Omi­cron was the dom­i­nant vari­ant, com­pared with the pe­ri­od when Delta was dom­i­nant.

The analy­sis al­so showed that un­vac­ci­nat­ed peo­ple were twice as like­ly to be re­in­fect­ed than those who had their sec­ond dose of vac­cine in the pre­vi­ous 14 to 89 days.

With in­fec­tion rates con­tin­u­ing to surge across most re­gions around the world and as the num­ber of re­in­fec­tions al­so climbs, ex­perts have said that pro­tec­tion from pre­vi­ous in­fec­tions or vac­cines de­clines over time.

What is a re­in­fec­tion?

A re­in­fec­tion is a med­ical con­di­tion that usu­al­ly oc­curs when a per­son be­comes in­fect­ed with COVID-19, re­cov­ers, and then gets in­fect­ed again. It could hap­pen with any of the vari­ants of the coro­n­avirus.

Ac­cord­ing to the Unit­ed States Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion (CDC), a re­in­fec­tion is con­sid­ered such if the pa­tient “tests pos­i­tive again 90 days or more af­ter their first pos­i­tive test”. The same stan­dard has been es­tab­lished by the UK Health Se­cu­ri­ty Agency (UKHSA).

The 90-day pe­ri­od has been cho­sen be­cause some pa­tients con­tin­ue to have the virus in their sys­tems for longer than the av­er­age of about two weeks, mak­ing it dif­fi­cult to dis­tin­guish be­tween an in­fec­tion or a re­in­fec­tion with­in this time frame.

“The ma­jor­i­ty of pa­tients with nor­mal im­mu­ni­ty do not have the virus be­yond 10-14 days, but some har­bour it for a longer time and there­fore the time has been ex­tend­ed to three months,” Dr Pere Domin­go, cur­rent­ly se­nior con­sul­tant and HIV/AIDS pro­gramme di­rec­tor at the In­fec­tious Dis­eases Unit of the Hos­pi­tal de la San­ta Creu i Sant Pau, told Al Jazeera.

Is this risk of COVID re­in­fec­tion ris­ing?

Ac­cord­ing to a re­port pub­lished by the UK’s ONS in June 2021, re­in­fec­tions were con­sid­ered rare, but the rate of re­in­fec­tions has in­creased since the Omi­cron vari­ant be­came the dom­i­nant strain in late 2021.

An analy­sis pub­lished last week by the news agency Reuters, cit­ing da­ta col­lect­ed by the UKHSA, sug­gest­ed that sus­pect­ed re­in­fec­tions ac­count­ed for ap­prox­i­mate­ly 10 per­cent of con­firmed cas­es in Eng­land in Jan­u­ary. Sus­pect­ed re­in­fec­tions made up few­er than 2 per­cent of cas­es in the six months pri­or to De­cem­ber 6. A to­tal of 588,000 pos­si­ble re­in­fec­tions have been reg­is­tered in Eng­land.

Mean­while in Italy, 3 per­cent of the new cas­es were re­in­fec­tions, up from about 1.5 per­cent be­fore Omi­cron, a spokesper­son for Italy’s Na­tion­al In­sti­tute of Health said last week.

Dr Domin­go not­ed that the Omi­cron vari­ant has mu­tat­ed sig­nif­i­cant­ly com­pared with oth­er vari­ants, mean­ing that pro­tec­tion de­vel­oped against pre­vi­ous vari­ants could be less ef­fec­tive against Omi­cron.

“Omi­cron has mu­tat­ed many times,” Dr Domin­go said. “These mu­ta­tions have changed the anti­gens, the pro­teins are no longer the same as they were in Delta, nor the strain that came out in Wuhan.

“There­fore, the an­ti­bod­ies that one could de­vel­op against the orig­i­nal strain or against Delta, are no longer use­ful for Omi­cron,” he added.

Ac­cord­ing to the re­search by Im­pe­r­i­al Col­lege Lon­don, the pro­tec­tion af­ford­ed by the past in­fec­tion may be “as low as 19 per­cent”.


Why are cas­es of re­in­fec­tions ris­ing?

Virus­es are con­stant­ly evolv­ing and these changes nat­u­ral­ly lead to the emer­gence of new strains that can lead to new in­fec­tions.

“There is al­ways a strug­gle be­tween the forces of the in­di­vid­ual and im­mu­ni­ty on the one hand and the virus on the oth­er,” Dr Domin­go said.

“And the way the virus fights is by chang­ing, by mak­ing mu­ta­tions that will al­low it to avoid the pa­tient’s an­ti­bod­ies,” he added.

Ac­cord­ing to re­search from South Africa, peo­ple in­fect­ed with Omi­cron de­vel­oped an an­ti­body re­sponse to the cur­rent and pre­vi­ous strains. How­ev­er, ac­cord­ing to the Gavi vac­cine al­liance, the im­mu­ni­ty from a Delta in­fec­tion pro­vides lim­it­ed pro­tec­tion against Omi­cron.

Pre­vi­ous in­fec­tions or vac­cines will pro­vide pro­tec­tion, and the greater the ex­po­sure to the virus leads to greater pro­tec­tion, but the “im­mu­ni­ty is not com­plete and it de­clines over time,” Dr Domin­go said.

“And if the virus changes, the pro­tec­tion gen­er­at­ed by in­fec­tion, is over­whelmed.”

Are re­in­fec­tions less se­vere?

Ac­cord­ing to ear­ly re­search, re­in­fec­tions are gen­er­al­ly mild. A study done in the state of Qatar found that re­in­fec­tions “have 90 per­cent low­er odds of re­sult­ing in hos­pi­tal­i­sa­tion or death than pri­ma­ry in­fec­tions”.

Dr William Schaffn­er, pro­fes­sor of med­i­cine at Van­der­bilt Uni­ver­si­ty Med­ical Cen­ter, said the sever­i­ty of a re­in­fe­tion de­pends on the pa­tient’s im­mune sys­tem.

“If you are im­muno-com­pro­mised, or if you are a per­son who is frail, or sick, then I would think a sec­ond in­fec­tion could po­ten­tial­ly be se­ri­ous enough to put you in the hos­pi­tal, but if you have a nor­mal im­mune sys­tem, the sec­ond in­fec­tion is not like­ly to be se­vere,” he added.

Ex­perts said a re­in­fec­tion would pro­vide some lev­el of im­mu­ni­ty against any po­ten­tial re­in­fec­tion in the fu­ture, but the best im­mu­ni­ty is the re­sult of a hy­brid im­mu­ni­ty.

Hy­brid im­mu­ni­ty is the re­sult of hav­ing been both in­fect­ed and vac­ci­nat­ed against the virus. Ac­cord­ing to re­search, this could gen­er­ate a “su­per-im­mune” re­sponse.

How­ev­er, there is a risk in the long term ef­fects of the in­fec­tion.

“Any­one who re­cov­ers from COVID stands or risk of de­vel­op­ing so-called Long COVID,” Dr Schaffn­er said.

“[And so far] we have no in­for­ma­tion, on whether sec­ond in­fec­tions are more like­ly to re­sult in Long COVID than first in­fec­tions,” he added.

How can the rate of re­in­fec­tions be slowed?

Ex­perts have said the cur­rent guid­ance in place to com­bat COVID-19 are still ef­fec­tive. The World Health Or­ga­ni­za­tion (WHO) has rec­om­mend­ed peo­ple get vac­ci­nat­ed.

It al­so ad­vised peo­ple to main­tain phys­i­cal dis­tance, avoid crowds and close con­tacts, wear a prop­er­ly fit­ted mask, clean your hands fre­quent­ly, and cov­er your mouth and nose when cough­ing or sneez­ing.

“We need peo­ple to keep [fol­low­ing] all these mea­sures,” Dr Ali Fat­tom said.

“Pre­cau­tions are very im­por­tant, not on­ly for the per­son it­self, but you don’t want to trans­mit the virus to oth­ers and put them at risk,” he added.

COVID-19Covid reinfection


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored