JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, May 30, 2025

'Robocop' freed of kidnapping charge

by

20100415

Sel­wyn 'Robo­cop' Alex­is has been freed of yet an­oth­er charge of kid­nap­ping. This was the third time that Alex­is has been ac­quit­ted of a kid­nap­ping charge. Yes­ter­day, Alex­is, 43, of En­ter­prise Vil­lage, Ch­agua­nas, and two oth­ers were dis­charged by Mag­is­trate Hem­raj Har­riper­sad at the Tu­na­puna Mag­is­trates' Court on charges of kid­nap­ping, rob­bery, lar­ce­ny and re­ceiv­ing stolen goods. Alex­is was charged joint­ly with Den­zil Collins, 44, of Par­adise Heights, Mor­vant, and Wen­dell Walk­er, 34, of Pin­to Road, Ari­ma, with kid­nap­ping Im­ti­az Khan on June 21, 2009, at In­dus­tri­al Lane, Mount Hope.

They were al­so charged with us­ing per­son­al vi­o­lence on Khan, rob­bing him of a $500,000 truck and cig­a­rettes val­ued at $3.5 mil­lion, and be­ing in pos­ses­sion of stolen goods. Walk­er was ad­di­tion­al­ly charged with pos­ses­sion of a Glock pis­tol and 12 live rounds of am­mu­ni­tion.

Alex­is, who had been in cus­tody since his ar­rest in Ju­ly 2009, walked out of the cour­t­house yes­ter­day. The pros­e­cu­tion closed its case yes­ter­day af­ter 12 wit­ness­es had tes­ti­fied at the pre­lim­i­nary in­quiry. Wayne Sturge, who rep­re­sent­ed Alex­is and Collins, made a no-case sub­mis­sion.

At­tor­ney Sophia Chote, who ap­peared for Walk­er, was ab­sent as she was re­port­ed to be out of the coun­try. Sturge said there was no di­rect ev­i­dence to con­nect the three de­fen­dants to the com­mis­sion of the of­fences of kid­nap­ping, rob­bery and lar­ce­ny. He point­ed out that the wit­ness­es had con­ced­ed that the three de­fen­dants were not the peo­ple who com­mit­ted the rob­bery. He said from the ev­i­dence ad­duced, the de­scrip­tion of the sus­pects did not match the de­fen­dants. Sturge said based on the po­lice tes­ti­mo­ny, there was no ev­i­dence to charge the de­fen­dants. In­struc­tions to charge came from se­nior of­fi­cers, he added. Mag­is­trate Har­riper­sad ruled right away, say­ing he agreed with Sturge's sub­mis­sions. He ex­pressed con­cern at the haste at which the po­lice ar­rest­ed the de­fen­dants with­out get­ting the ev­i­dence.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored