JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, May 4, 2025

Dillian gets humanitarian protection

by

2297 days ago
20190119
Dillian Johnson

Dillian Johnson

“I feel vin­di­cat­ed.” That was the re­ac­tion of Dil­lian John­son in an emailed re­sponse mo­ments af­ter he was told that he had been grant­ed hu­man­i­tar­i­an pro­tec­tion by the Unit­ed King­dom Home Of­fice for the next five years.

John­son, fled the coun­try in De­cem­ber 2017 af­ter he was shot at his Gas­par­il­lo home. He claimed then that he was a vic­tim of a tar­get­ed hit.

In a de­tailed UK Home Of­fice let­ter sent yes­ter­day to John­son’s UK-based lawyers, Sarah Lat­timer and Michael Mc Gar­vey, the UK Home Of­fice of Visas and Im­mi­gra­tion said: “Dear Mr John­son, Your claim for asy­lum made on De­cem­ber 30, 2017, is re­fused. How­ev­er, I have de­cid­ed that you should be grant­ed hu­man­i­tar­i­an pro­tec­tion.”

The let­ter was signed by Richard Is­sacs on be­half of the Sec­re­tary of State.

Ac­cord­ing to UK Home Of­fice, John­son had ap­plied for refugee sta­tus on a “well-found­ed fear of per­se­cu­tion in Trinidad and To­ba­go on the ba­sis of your mem­ber­ship of a par­tic­u­lar so­cial group (a gay man).”

Ac­cord­ing to the doc­u­ment, John­son’s fears of per­se­cu­tion were mere­ly sub­jec­tive and did not qual­i­fy un­der the Gene­va Con­ven­tion for asy­lum seek­ers.

The Home Of­fice made this point clear in point 51 un­der the sec­tion As­sess­ment of fu­ture fear (suf­fi­cien­cy of pro­tec­tion) as they stat­ed: “In ad­di­tion, it al­so demon­strates a will­ing­ness and abil­i­ty of the po­lice to as­sist those who have faced is­sues re­lat­ing to their sex­u­al­i­ty, this cou­pled with the de­crim­i­nal­i­sa­tion of con­sen­su­al LGBT ac­tiv­i­ty clear­ly in­di­cates that even if it were ac­cept­ed that an in­di­vid­ual was at risk of per­se­cu­tion by non-state or rogue state ac­tors on ac­count of their sex­u­al­i­ty, such per­se­cu­tions is nei­ther state-spon­sored nor state con­doned.”

The sec­tion fur­ther stat­ed: “In light of the above con­clu­sions, it is ac­cept­ed that you have demon­strat­ed hav­ing a gen­uine sub­jec­tive fear on re­turn to Trinidad and To­ba­go on ac­count of your sex­u­al­i­ty at the time of your ap­pli­ca­tion for asy­lum. How­ev­er, for the rea­sons giv­en be­low it is con­sid­ered this gen­uine sub­jec­tive fear is not ob­jec­tive­ly well found­ed as suf­fi­cient pro­tec­tion is avail­able.”

The Home Of­fice al­so sought to di­rect John­son and his lawyers as to why he was grant­ed specif­i­cal­ly hu­man­i­tar­i­an pro­tec­tion un­der the UK laws.

“Hu­man­i­tar­i­an Pro­tec­tion must be grant­ed where there are sub­stan­tial grounds for be­liev­ing that there is a re­al risk of se­ri­ous harm. In con­sid­er­ing whether there are such grounds the stan­dard of proof to be ap­plied is the same as ap­plies in asy­lum, that is ‘a rea­son­able de­gree of like­li­hood’ that the per­son would face a ‘re­al risk’ of se­ri­ous harm on re­turn to their coun­try of ori­gin.”

Those not el­i­gi­ble for refugee sta­tus can ob­tain hu­man­i­tar­i­an pro­tec­tion. In this case, they can­not be re­moved from na­tion­al ter­ri­to­ry be­cause of ob­jec­tive and se­ri­ous per­son­al sit­u­a­tions.

Al­le­ga­tions sur­faced in 2017 that Chief Jus­tice Ivor Archie tried to in­flu­ence Supreme Court jus­tices to change their per­son­al state-pro­vid­ed se­cu­ri­ty in favour of a pri­vate se­cu­ri­ty com­pa­ny that em­ploys his “close friend” Dil­lian John­son, a con­vict­ed felon, as a con­sul­tant.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored