JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, February 23, 2025

Ex-solicitor general hasn’t read report on missing file: I'm retired now

by

31 days ago
20250124
Former solicitor general   Carol Hernandez

Former solicitor general Carol Hernandez

De­spite damn­ing crit­i­cism of her in the re­cent­ly pub­li­cised Stan­ley John re­port, for­mer So­lic­i­tor Gen­er­al (SG) Car­ol Her­nan­dez is re­fus­ing to com­ment on the find­ings.

In fact, Her­nan­dez told Guardian Me­dia she has not yet read the re­port which called in­to ques­tion her will­ing­ness to ful­ly in­ves­ti­gate what hap­pened with the miss­ing case file that could po­ten­tial­ly cost the State and tax­pay­ers over $20 mil­lion in dam­ages.

The for­mer SG added she may read it some­time in the fu­ture, but she un­der­scored that she is now re­tired.

The SG and Chief State So­lic­i­tor’s de­part­ments were de­scribed as “in­ept” and “in­com­pe­tent” as it re­lat­ed to the miss­ing case file.

The dis­ap­pear­ance of the file led to nine men, who were for­mer­ly ac­cused of the kid­nap­ping and mur­der of busi­ness­woman Vin­dra Naipaul-Cool­man, be­ing award­ed a de­fault judg­ment of over $20 mil­lion for ma­li­cious pros­e­cu­tion.

The in­ves­tiga­tive team con­clud­ed that the file, which was sub­se­quent­ly dis­cov­ered in an un­oc­cu­pied of­fice was placed there de­lib­er­ate­ly and has even called for the trans­fer of staff who “failed their du­ty to the State.”

The re­port claimed that up­on learn­ing that the miss­ing file was found, Her­nan­dez did not im­me­di­ate­ly act to deal with the mat­ter.

It al­so added that when in­ter­viewed on March 1, 2023, Her­nan­dez showed lit­tle in­ter­est in the in­ves­ti­ga­tion.

Her­nan­dez al­so of­fered no com­ment on how the in­ves­tiga­tive team ar­rived at its find­ings.

How­ev­er, the As­sem­bly of Cen­tral Le­gal Prac­ti­tion­ers (ACLP) be­lieves the re­port ap­pears to shift blame from the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al and in­stead thrusts it on­to pub­lic ser­vants.

ACLP Pres­i­dent Kiel Tak­lals­ingh said yes­ter­day, “What you have hap­pen­ing here is an in­ves­ti­ga­tor ap­point­ed by the po­lit­i­cal di­rec­torate to in­ves­ti­gate pub­lic ser­vants. I think quite frankly this is a col­lat­er­al at­tack on the pub­lic ser­vice and se­nior pub­lic ser­vants.”

Noth­ing that in­ter­views were done with Her­nan­dez and cur­rent act­ing SG Kar­lene Seenath, Tak­lals­ingh asked, “Has the in­ves­ti­ga­tor in­ter­viewed the AG to find out his role in the mat­ter? What did he do? When did it come to his at­ten­tion? What were his im­me­di­ate steps? I have al­so not seen any rep­re­sen­ta­tion in the re­port of the at­tor­neys on the oth­er side, they would have had all the facts as well, so why not en­gage them?”

Re­spond­ing to the re­port’s con­clu­sion that no one should be dis­ci­plined or charged for the neg­li­gence high­light­ed in its find­ings, Tak­lals­ingh said, “This is po­lit­i­cal neg­li­gence in my view, a fail­ure of lead­er­ship by the AG and there should be some re­spon­si­bil­i­ty cast there.”

Mean­while, the East­ern Lawyers As­so­ci­a­tion (ELS), said the re­port high­lights and ex­pos­es the sys­temic short­com­ings of the sys­tem, staff short­ages and po­ten­tial for cor­rup­tion that ex­ists and that do not sur­prise prac­ti­tion­ers who fre­quent­ly in­ter­act with State At­tor­neys at the So­lic­i­tor Gen­er­al’s De­part­ment.

In a state­ment, the ELS said, “Giv­en the vol­ume of mat­ters and high-stress en­vi­ron­ment many of the ex­pe­ri­enced at­tor­neys have left and sought out op­por­tu­ni­ties else­where in­clud­ing the ju­di­cia­ry and on­ly see their time at the AG’s of­fice as a step­ping stone.”

The as­so­ci­a­tion said the pub­lic should not be too dis­tract­ed that no charges or dis­ci­pli­nary ac­tion were rec­om­mend­ed.

“But con­cen­trate on the broad­er sys­temic is­sues that ex­ist with­in the AG’s of­fice that need to be ad­dressed,” it ad­vised.

When con­tact­ed for its view on the mat­ter, the Law As­so­ci­a­tion of Trinidad and To­ba­go (LATT) would on­ly say that it is con­sid­er­ing the re­port at this time.

Ef­forts to get a com­ment from At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Regi­nald Ar­mour were un­suc­cess­ful.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored