Former Strategic Services Agency (SSA) director retired Major Roger Best has taken National Security Minister Fitzgerald Hinds to court for failing to grant his request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) relating to his dismissal.
The first hearing of Best’s lawsuit came up yesterday before Justice Joan Charles but was adjourned at the request of the Minister’s attorneys. His legal team of attorneys Rishi Dass SC and Raphael Adjoda indicated they were only briefed by the Minister on Wednesday night and needed a short adjournment to prepare their case.
Best, who is being represented by attorneys Arden Williams and Mariah Ramrattan, is seeking several reliefs from the court, including a declaration that the minister’s decision to refuse him or respond to his request for the information under the FOIA, is illegal, null, void and of no effect. He also wants the court to order the minister to provide him with the requested information.
Best made an official request under the FOIA in July but received no response or any indication or request for an extension of time as required under the Act. Because the minister failed to state whether he had approved or denied his request, Best submitted that he was effectively denied the information.
The matter was adjourned to October 15.
Best was initially sent on administrative leave on March 2, then fired on May 18. He was among 28 employees, including confessed spy for the SSA Pastor Ian Brown, dismissed by the State.
On July 3 in Parliament, Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley read into Hansard a statement on an audit of the SSA done by director Brigadier Anthony Phillips-Spencer. The audit revealed that the agency under Best had amassed military-grade weapons and ammunition and operated a highly trained and militarised “tactical response unit.”
Rowley said there were disturbing practices of nepotism and opportunism leading to a concentration of members of one church being hired by the SSA, instances of dishonesty and deep deception. He said the 28 SSA employees were terminated, either for violations of the SSA Act and Regulations or anomalous recruitment of faulty promotion processes and practices. — Sascha Wilson