JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, March 17, 2025

Gary: NTA didn’t invite Kamla to coalition meeting

by

19 days ago
20250227
National Transformation Alliance leader Gary Griffith

National Transformation Alliance leader Gary Griffith

Gail Alexan­der

Se­nior Po­lit­i­cal Re­porter

Na­tion­al Trans­for­ma­tion Al­liance (NTA) leader Gary Grif­fith has stressed that his par­ty wasn’t in­volved in invit­ing UNC leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar to a March 12 meet­ing be­ing held by NTA, HOPE and Com­mu­ni­ty Ref­or­ma­tion Net­work. The three groups have formed the Pro­gres­sive Al­liance coali­tion.

Grif­fith dis­tanced him­self from the in­vi­ta­tion is­sued by HOPE to Per­sad-Bisses­sar for the meet­ing which will be held at NTA’s Mt Lam­bert head­quar­ters.

“The NTA was nev­er in­volved in invit­ing Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar to this meet­ing. The in­vi­ta­tion was ex­tend­ed by the HOPE, which is sep­a­rate from the NTA. Any dis­cus­sions or arrange­ments made be­tween HOPE and Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar re­main in­de­pen­dent of our or­gan­i­sa­tion,” he said.

“The NTA has al­ways been firm in its com­mit­ment to en­sur­ing that the 148,000 vot­ers who stood for trans­for­ma­tion in 2007 un­der the Con­gress of the Peo­ple (COP) are nev­er sub­ject­ed to po­lit­i­cal ma­nip­u­la­tion or be­tray­al again.”

He said be­tween 2010 and 2015, third-par­ty sup­port­ers such as the COP, MSJ and oth­ers were used for “po­lit­i­cal con­ve­nience” to en­sure the UNC se­cured a 21-seat ma­jor­i­ty in Par­lia­ment “then were dis­missed and dis­card­ed...”

Grif­fith added that he re­ject­ed the “mis­in­for­ma­tion be­ing spread re­gard­ing our stance on po­lit­i­cal al­liances.”

He ex­plained, “The NTA recog­nis­es both the UNC and the PNM as po­lit­i­cal op­po­nents and, as such, we wouldn’t ex­tend an in­vi­ta­tion to one while ex­clud­ing the oth­er. Our mis­sion is to con­test elec­tions on be­half of the peo­ple, not fa­cil­i­tate the am­bi­tions of po­lit­i­cal en­ti­ties that have his­tor­i­cal­ly failed the elec­torate.”

He in­vit­ed all cit­i­zens—PNM, UNC, or oth­er­wise—to the meet­ing and urged UNC sup­port­ers “to recog­nise the pat­tern of de­cep­tion.” Grif­fith al­leged that Per­sad-Bisses­sar had “false­ly claimed” that she and her ex­ec­u­tive were dis­re­spect­ed by the NTA.

“On her state­ments re­gard­ing sup­posed ques­tions to an­swer, ac­count­abil­i­ty works both ways. Be­fore at­tempt­ing to in­ter­ro­gate oth­ers, she must first an­swer for the ac­tions of those with­in her own par­ty and ad­min­is­tra­tion,” he said

He claimed these in­clude “state con­tracts be­ing award­ed to crim­i­nal el­e­ments un­der her gov­ern­ment, in­clud­ing the con­struc­tion of po­lice sta­tions.”

“Can she guar­an­tee that such reck­less gov­er­nance won’t be re­peat­ed? The re­lease of known crim­i­nal fig­ures back on­to the streets, who were pre­vi­ous­ly in­car­cer­at­ed, al­leged per­son­al re­la­tion­ships be­tween high-rank­ing in­di­vid­u­als in her par­ty and crim­i­nal el­e­ments, which raise se­ri­ous con­cerns about po­ten­tial con­flicts of in­ter­est.”

Grif­fith said these ques­tions must be an­swered be­fore any dis­cus­sion of al­liances or co-op­er­a­tion can even be con­sid­ered.

“With re­gard to her ask­ing for rel­e­vance, she con­ve­nient­ly for­gets it was she who would call me at all hours of the morn­ing to beg me to walk with her can­di­dates in San Fer­nan­do and the East-West Cor­ri­dor dur­ing lo­cal Gov­ern­ment elec­tions. Were we ir­rel­e­vant then? Did we pass some test? Is this hypocrisy and un­grate­ful­ness on her part?” Grif­fith asked

On UNC coali­tion part­ners, PEP and Love Move­ment, Grif­fith added, “Can you please tell T&T who se­lect­ed them, when was their last po­lit­i­cal meet­ing, how many vot­ers they’re bring­ing? Show when any of them last got their de­posits back when con­test­ing elec­tions. Name one oth­er per­son, be­sides Phillip Alexan­der and Lennox Smith, in the PEP and Love Move­ment re­spec­tive­ly.”

HOPE chair­man Steve Al­varez said the par­ty is dis­ap­point­ed but un­sur­prised by Per­sad-Bisses­sar’s re­jec­tion of its in­vi­ta­tion to the March meet­ing.

“We be­lieve that for T&T to move for­ward and re­alise its tremen­dous po­ten­tial, we need our best peo­ple to par­tic­i­pate in the process and that means sup­port­ers of both the PNM and UNC,” he said.

“HOPE couldn’t in­vite the PNM’s leader to the Al­liance meet­ing, they’re in ser­vice and we’re at­tempt­ing to be the bet­ter al­ter­na­tive. It’s our be­lief, based on the his­to­ry of T&T’s elec­tions, that an al­liance is the on­ly path to po­lit­i­cal vic­to­ry against the rul­ing and well-or­gan­ised PNM. It’s hoped that the UNC is much more than its leader and that its mem­ber­ship will un­der­stand the need for uni­ty and join us in an en­deav­our to be a vi­able al­ter­na­tive to the present ad­min­is­tra­tion.

“With re­gards to the on­go­ing war of words be­tween the lead­ers of the UNC and NTA, it’s our hope that good sense would pre­vail and they would fo­cus on the task of re­build­ing our coun­try rather than con­tin­ue along a path that ben­e­fits no one.”

Al­varez said HOPE deputy leader Louis Lee Sing is away from T&T on per­son­al mat­ters.

“We ex­pect that when he re­turns, he’ll con­tin­ue sup­port­ing our ini­tia­tives. This is a crit­i­cal time in the his­to­ry of T&T and the world. The good peo­ple must find the men­tal and phys­i­cal strength to stand up for good gov­er­nance and hope or de­spair would pre­vail,” he said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored