Economists say:

Target high income earners

Published: 6 Sep 2009

Targeting the budget deficit at low-income earners and the social safety net will not be enough to get the economy going, say financial analysts. More effort must be placed at improving confidence of higher-income earners and getting people to begin spending and rebuilding the economy, they are saying. “Low-income earners are much more frugal than policy-makers think, and we need to get confidence levels up for higher-income earners and corporate customers to purchase cars and invest in factory and stock to generate growth and demand,” said head of Securities and Asset Management at CMMB, Brent Salvary. “I don’t think targeting the stimulus at low-level income earners will help much, because consumers need to start spending on larger commodities, such as on their homes, factory construction, or real estate asset repairs, which will generate employment, economic activity and provide the infrastructure for future productivity and growth.”

He said the budget attempted to tackle several very complicated and inter-related issues, as the Government sought to replace consumer-spending with government-spending during a recession to keep the economy going. This strategy could work in other economies such as the US, where consumer-spending made up to 70 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but in Trinidad and Tobago this contribution was much lower, he explained. Some stimulus measures were important for developing infrastructure, for protecting the less fortunate in society and for generating employment. “However, even though much of this stimulus is targeted towards lower-income persons who are expected to spend more of their incomes than wealthier persons, what we may find is that even low-income people are holding back on spending, as they are not confident about their income streams into the future.

“As a result, you may not get the kind of rebound that you might expect. In the US, incentive programmes for local production such as the auto industry’s “Cash for Clunkers” directly provided a stimulus for one of the largest employers in the economy. “Similarly, it will be difficult to find industries such as these in the local economy to generate employment and economic activity as expected,” he explained. “The idea of a stimulus package is commendable, but in our economy I don’t think it will have the desired effect. World energy prices are relatively low, and gas prices have fallen significantly and have not recovered. “Gas is still around US$2.50. This is way down from where it was just a year ago, and there is no end in sight for a recovery over the next few years. “Deficit running cannot be considered a long-term solution, particularly with energy prices so unpredictable.
“Major challenges I see moving forward include the shortage of labour, dealing with inflation, funding education and enhancing the current skill set—particularly in the construction sector, so we will be able to take advantage of opportunities for growth.”

Long-term deficit?
Republic Bank economist Ronald Ramkissoon said the Finance Minister was pursuing a standard economic management policy, and the deficit must be made to get the economy rolling again. He noted, however, that it must be targeted, and it must have a clear objective in mind that is measurable. “When revenues fall during a recession, governments must run a deficit to inject funding into the system to boost economic activity and employment, thus taking up the slack for the private sector. “In the long run, current deficits balance off themselves with surpluses when the economy becomes buoyant in the future, but deficits are unavoidable if you want to get the economy out of its downward cycle faster. “Deficits are inevitable in a recession, because revenues received are lower, as well as you need to spend more into targeted sectors of the economy to get the biggest impact on growth, poverty-reduction and business activity.

“If we take the view that deficits in these times are appropriate, we have to be careful that we do not run deficits indefinitely.
“This is okay over the period of between one to three years, but you have to find other sources to fund deficits as well as hold back on expenditures over time. “For Trinidad and Tobago and most countries across the globe, deficits must be viewed as temporary to maintain employment and economic activity until prices for world commodities pick up and the economy is able to generate surpluses again.” According to Ramkissoon, “We are in the fortunate position that we have been having surpluses over the past eight years.
“This makes it easier for us to access local and international markets and enhances our ability to borrow or use from our savings to fund budget deficits. “Many others are not in such a fortunate position, so there are still some positives. We do not want to move forward with spending too quickly and use up our resources before the world economy recovers.

“If growth is not sustained, we may have to take a second dip or a much longer-term view of deficits. No one knows what the future holds, but we must be careful about the period we are looking for growth to resume. “The Finance Minister must focus on infrastructure development that will encourage private sector lending and the expansion of private sector business activity.” Access roads, breaking into new foreign markets, international marketing and social development spending must be key sectors targeted for government spending, if the Minister wanted to stimulate the local economy in a sustainable manner. He said incentives needed to be introduced to get more private companies to go public and become listed on the Stock Exchange. This would provide avenues for savings and the surplus liquidity in the system to be invested into production, economic diversification and wealth-generation.

Article Tools

Related

Multimedia
  • There is no related multimedia.
Stories
 

This budget, like all the

This budget, like all the others, will be long, boring and confusing.

While the Government senators thump the desk in approval for the bligh they "giving" we, the Opposition will be so confused that their commentaries afterwards will be void or any substance and filled with nothing useful.

The tv stations will bring out the same boring "experts" to disect the budget and after all the fanfare, it will be passed in Parliament.

I just can't wait to see the snug and arrogant look on the faces of certain Ministers as they "give" us handouts.

While Mr. Brent Salvary and

While Mr. Brent Salvary and Mr. Ronald Ramkissoon are talking economics as the world knows it, the PNM government never will go anywhere near these two gentlemen advise. History has shown that this administration "manage by crises" and good economics and financial management is rubbish to Manning and the boys. When this government can tell the nation that it has spent $700M on the Brian Lara complex and do not know when it will be completed or how much more it will cost, you know what financial and economic management means to them. The summit of they Americas cost us billions in order to feed Patrick's ego while he lives in a palace paid for by tax payers. What are the real achievements for the people, water, health care, social services, where are we with these?
There is one and only one way out for this big spending government, devaluation and that will bring spiraling inflation, loss of jobs and make us more dependant for hand outs. We are certainly looking down the barrel of social unrest as the money flows in and out on food and consumer goods. We are contribution to the stimulation of the foreign companies that we import from because this government refused to work in the interest of its people. May God help Trinidad and Tobago.

Foreign Consultants: - I

Foreign Consultants: -
I hear you loud and clear. But there is another reason why Mr. Manning would not listen to the advice coming from Mr. Ron Salvary and/or Mr. Ronald Ramkisson. They are both in T&T. Mr. Manning's preference is for FOREIGN consultants who will advise him. We have seen the trend over the years. We are getting into deeper trouble.

How come our Finance Minister is not with the G20 group? Was her invitation lost in the post?

Gardenia, she better check

Gardenia, she better check with Mr.Hunte, he may have her ticket, he is better known for collecting tickets rather than contributing to the nation welfare. On a more serious note, we may be big in carricom but a speck to the world's big finance players

Ram, I hear you. So

Ram, I hear you. So true.
But our Finance Minister better get their frock or tux ready and waiting. Didn't our Mr. Manning promise us that he will be taking us to a place among the top 10 in the world soon ... we can hang our hat on that ... He always keeps his promises, doesn't he? Soon we will be taking our seat among the most powerful at the round table!

Capital Flight will continue

Capital Flight will continue as long as there is lack of confidence in the economy. Money is simply an accounting system. Having our own accounting system (the TT$), controlled by incompetent and mediocre managers guarantees capital flight, eventual devaluation (reduced purchasing power of the $TT), and social unrest.

Unless and until the leadership addresses sustainability and stops trying to impress with tall (empty) buildings and stadia, the outcome is sadly predictable.... Trinidad and Tobago will surely fail.

Be responsible and not

Be responsible and not wasteful, is all I'm asking of our government. Now, don't blame the Opposition for government bad spending dollars. The Prime Minister in particular, since he's the head of Cabinet, ought to ensure that every dollar is spent wisely. Lightning has struck twice and we are fortunate to have gas resources to bail us out through this one. When the gas and oil done, wah we going to do, be like Haiti? Hope not!
ajfyzabadbutlertown

T&T's contraction is due to

T&T's contraction is due to the fact that expenditure followed income too closely. T&T basically spent its way into a reccession. The level of expenditure was unsustainable outside of high energy prices, therefore a contraction is inevitable. Building up debt may mask the underlying problem, for a while, which is the country overspent its resources. But debt has to be repaid with interest so it just delays neccessary cutbacks. When looking at past state expenditures one is doubtful if the borrowed funds will be put to profitable use. If an economy grew because of an external temporary factor, when that factor is removed cutbacks are the next logical step. The best option is to use current resources more efficiently. Possible options include abandoning public works projects like CEPEP and URP to free up this labor to work in the private sector where they can be used more productively and secondly by releasing inefficient or loss making state owned enterprises (as done in the past with Caroni and BWIA). Countries are successful because of the use of resources not by the fact that resources exist.
Duane Winchester
New York

When all is said and done,

When all is said and done, the PNM (ie. Prime Minister) is not really interested in the opinions of Consultants. The PM will make his own decisions - those that he is hoping will impress foreign heads of state. He will not even take the advice of the highly qualified Central Bank Governor.

The budget will be a highly touted document, well presented, but as always, confusing. No mention of additional expenditures for projects such as the Tarouba Stadium (Brian Lara : kindly ask for your name to be removed from the complex - it is a personal embarassment).

A credit agency has put TnT on a credit watch and the Finance Minister simply dismisses the evaluation. I cannot believe the arrogance. In the end, all 'ordinary' citizens will pay for this incompetence (positive spin on the budget or not). The 'spend and spend more' mentality (without tangible benefits) is hurting the entire country.

We need to see more on job creation vs. social handouts, and on using the available working population more effectively (yes, productivity is an issue in TnT). We want to see more on basic needs such as health care, basic infrastructure projects, water
requirements. As another blogger said, 'talk is cheap' in TnT', even in a budget. It's quite another matter to deliver results, and be held accountable.

 
 

Feedback