Jamaat al Muslimeen leader Yasin Abu Bakr wants a permanent stay of his trial on charges of sedition, terrorism and incitement. This was stated by attorney Wayne Sturge yesterday as he complained, for yet another time, about adverse pre-trial publicity against his client.
It was not the first time that Bakr had complained about the adverse pre-trial publicity. In fact, Justice Mark Mohammed had ruled last year that the trial be delayed to allow the publicity to subside. When the matter was called before Mohammed in the Port-of-Spain Third Criminal Court yesterday, Sturge raised the matter again.
He pointed to recent comments of Attorney General John Jeremie, on the decision of Justice Rajendra Narine to send Bakr's affidavit to the acting Commissioner of Police and the acting Director of Public Prosecutions in the summons for sale case. Sturge said as titular head of the Bar, Jeremie should be more careful as to what he says relating to Bakr. Sturge asked Mohammed to direct that Jeremie "shut up." Sturge was also concerned yesterday about comments made on television by retired Justice of Appeal Jean Permanand, on the same issue. Permanand is a member of the Judicial and Legal Service Commission and also chairman of the Law Reform Commission.
Sturge also cited a report in the Trinidad Express in which he said the newspaper suggested that Bakr was a liar. "I want to put the court on notice that we will be coming for a permanent stay of the indictment," he added. Dana Seetahal, SC, who represented the State, found nothing wrong with what Jeremie had said. She said the court could not give an order for the AG to be silenced. She added that It could guide the AG on matters such as pre-trial publicity. Mohammed said he would look at the issue again, and give his ruling next Tuesday. Bakr, 66, of La Puerta Road, Diego Martin, is facing charges of sedition, terrorism, incitement and breaching the peace, arising out of his sermon to commemorate Eid-ul-Fitr on November 4, 2005, at his Mucurapo Road mosque.
