- Last update:1 min 29 sec ago
Architects call for slower approach to construction
Prof John Uff
Architects are calling on the Government to adapt “a slower and balanced approach” towards construction in the country. The call was made by President of Trinidad and Tobago Institute of Architects (TTIA) Gary Turton. He was speaking at a seminar to commemorate World Day of Architects 2009 at the Building and Interiors Trade Show (BITS) at the Centre of Excellence in Macoya, Tunapuna, on Saturday. Turton said the TTIA and others in the industry had told the Government about its accelerated plan to construct buildings in T&T through the Joint Consultative Council.
He said the members had recommended a slower and balanced approach to constructing buildings which would have allowed local consultants and contractors to “gear up” to meet the developmental goals of the country. Turton said a slower approach to construction would have allowed for inclusion of members of the local construction sector. He also said the Udecott inquiry must be allowed to continue. “I believe the public needs to be completely satisfied that there’s been no wrongdoing by certain state agencies,” he said. “If there has been, the perpetrators should be penalised. “We must remember that a state enterprise such as Udecott was formed to construct buildings in T&T for the benefit of the people of T&T.”
Turton said TTIA supported the conclusion of the Uff commission, because it was a waste of public funds. “For us, we continue to lobby for change,” he said. “We support the conclusion of the Uff Commission of Enquiry, in that, while there is a cost to the public, it would have been a waste of public money, if a full conclusion is not made.” Prof John Uff, chairman of the commission, declared, on September 7, that the sittings of the commission had to be stalled, because the commission was not gazetted. “It does not follow that the proceedings which have taken place over eight weeks have been “illegal” or of no effect,” Uff had said. Justice Mira Dean-Armorer ordered, on October 2, that the Uff Commission should not hold further hearings until February, when Udecott’s judicial review case against the commission was scheduled to be held. Reports on October 6, indicated that Attorney General John Jeremie had requested that Udecott’s attorneys should withdraw the court order, and on Friday, Dean-Armorer revoked an order which stalled the inquiry into the construction sector, making the way clear for the proceedings to continue.
Response:
President of the Contractors Association Mikey Joseph said T&T had wasted too much time when it came to the sittings of the Uff enquiry, and the proceedings should continue. He said if an executive had committed acts in contravention of the law, he should be treated like the criminals who committed murder. “Transparency or not, what we want is action to be taken on those who would have committed any acts in contravention of the law, using the excuse that they broke the law because they were acting on behalf of the State,” Joseph said.
This view coming from the
This view coming from the Architects about controlled construction in the country is one which I advanced during the first oil boom years and which I have been reiterating during the recent energy boom.
I was alarmed when the late Mervyn De Sousa attempted to justify suprastructure before infrastructure. And I was no less alarmed to see history repeating itself.
My view was and still is that the two should proceed in parallel to ensure the basic needs of the population are not sacrificed for a few mega-projects.
In addition, I have always maintained that windfalls should not be splurged recklessly as this leads to hyper inflation, a deflection of labour from vital sectors and a destruction of the work ethic.
I really do hope that all
I really do hope that all the small and medium size contractors who moved to the beat of the government's drum have big bank overdrafts to buffer this negative turnaround.
Lots of small businessmen in the construction industry invested very heavily in equipment so as to fulfil the needs of government and private development, only to be now holding their heads and bawling as they cannot get paid, and in return, cannot repay their loans.
http://dsaltsman.blogspot.com/
I would like "my" government
I would like "my" government to also focus on protecting the historical architecture of T&T rather than simply building shiny glass edifices which either are defective or lay dormant due to lack of need. As has been the case with most of modern T&T, we have adopted everything foreign at the expense of our cultural history. Gone forever, are the beautiful buildings that told the story (good or bad) of us as a people and a nation. For every new building built, there should be funds set aside (a tarif) to restore a historic one. History lost, can not be retrieved.
To the writer who says about
To the writer who says about "his" Government, that "we have adopted everything foreign at the expense of our cultural history".
Apparently he is one of those grossly misinformed Trinidadians who blame foreigners for all of their shortcomings. Having travelled all over the world, I have seen many countries who go to great lengths to preserve their historical buildings while at the same time erecting huge new structures. Malaysia is a good example of a country which has maintained all of its historic buildings in pristine condition, has the largest Mosque in the World and also the tallest building in the World in the Petrobras Towers. Please do not blame foreigners for the sad state of affairs in Trinidad. The blame rests squarely on 'your" Government for its myopia, short-sightedness and lack of vision.
And to the writer who
And to the writer who clearly didn't properly read the comment before his, then made silly defensive comments about 'blaming foreigners':
If you would carefully process what ggriffith said:
-"I would like "my" government to ALSO focus on protecting the historical architecture of T&T "
-"WE have adopted everything foreign at the expense of our cultural history."
-"For every new building built, there should be funds set aside (a tarif) to restore a historic one. "
though the suggestion might be a little unrealistic in regards to EVERY building built, clearly the writer was (a)not blaming foreigners, but saying that we as a people need to take responsibility and
(b)the writer is clearly not saying to stop building new buildings, but advocating the integration of progress and historical preservation.
so before throwing silly little hissy fits, PLEASE READ CAREFULLY FIRST.
Please don't mislead the
Please don't mislead the people. It's the Petronas towers, Petrobras is a Brasilian energy company and the world's tallest building is Burj Dubai.VR
Splutter! Please don't
Splutter!
Please don't mislead the people. It's the Petronas towers, Petrobras is a Brasilian energy company and the world's tallest building is Burj Dubai.
Who needs to go to the movies, when all the drama takes place here in the Guardian! The 'misleading of the people' seems to be contagious!
xantipuel - thanks for pointing that out. However, I do not know 100%, am only a Diva, not an architect, but I think there may be an error in your statement. Quick research suggests that a building can only claim "tallest building" status, on completion.
The Council for Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) says in various parts of its website (http://www.ctbuh.org) (and says updated September 2009):
- the Taipei 101 (in Taiwan, www.taipei-101.com.tw) is the tallest building, with 101 stories and 509m/1670 to the "Architectural Top".
- the Burj Dubai (http://www.burjdubaiskyscraper.com/) will be 160+ stories and 800m/2,600ft on completion. "The disassembly procedure of the last crane, the installation of the few cladding panels left and the landscaping will mean the end of it." Until this happens, I imagine the Taipei 101 will continue to hold the record.
- there tallest building under construction but apparently on hold is: The Nakheel Tower, due for completion in 2020 with 200+ stories and 1,000+m/3,281+ft
Thanks still, for sending me on this information discovery path. Things one learns by partaking in the e-version of the Guardian!
A much wiser, la Diva