Senior Reporter
derek.achong@guardian.co.tt
A High Court Judge has agreed to add a consultancy company to a lawsuit over the promotion assessment process for the rank of Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP).
Justice Frank Seepersad took the decision in relation to Odyssey Consultinc Limited, as the lawsuit brought by Inspector Mark Hernandez alleging breaches of the Police Service Act and Regulations came up for hearing on Wednesday morning.
During the hearing, Justice Seepersad referred to evidence filed by Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) Natasha George after the lawsuit was filed by Hernandez and an almost identical case was brought by his colleague Inspector Veneta Weaver-Ali.
In her affidavit, George admitted that she wrongly advised Odyssey, which was hired by the T&T Police Service (TTPS) to assist with the promotion exercise, to allow all participants to advance to the second stage of the process even if they failed to attain the pass mark in the examination stage.
She claimed that she was subsequently advised that only the “top performing candidates” could advance based on the regulations.
“I, therefore, acted on a mistaken basis in informing Odyssey to permit all candidates from stage one to advance to stage two of the process,” George said.
Justice Seepersad questioned the status of the case in light of George’s admission.
“Clearly on the face of the evidence, there was a significant misstep on how the process should move forward,” Justice Seepersad said.
He questioned whether the entire process should be restarted and the case abandoned.
Senior Counsel Rishi Dass, who led the legal team for the State, suggested that the case should be allowed to proceed on an expedited basis as it is not only limited to the issue addressed by George.
“It would not help us to restart and there is this same dispute,” Dass said.
Hernandez’s lawyer Gerald Ramdeen agreed but called on Justice Seepersad to add Odyssey as he questioned why it did not volunteer its participation.
“I am disappointed by the conduct of someone paid by the taxpayers who is not willing to come and provide the court with assistance on the wider issues,” Ramdeen said.
Justice Seepersad agreed and granted the application.
The case is expected to come up for hearing on November 12, when Justice Seepersad is expected to finalise a timeline for the determination of the case. He promised to give a final ruling before the end of the year.
Hernandez was the head of the now-defunct Special Operations Response Team (SORT), which was established under the tenure of former police commissioner Gary Griffith.
However, he has been on suspension since May 2021 when he was charged with misbehaviour in public office in relation to an investigation into the treatment of the suspects held for the abduction and murder of Andrea Bharatt including two, who died while in police custody.
There is no legal impediment for officers to be promoted while they have pending criminal cases.
While Hernandez’s lawyers are complaining that colleagues without performance appraisals were allowed to participate in the promotion exercise, they are also challenging how the appraisals were done.
They claimed that Hernandez and other officers received blanket “outstanding” ratings without their performance being critically assessed.
They suggested that the “universal mark procedure’’ was contrary to the T&T Police Service (TTPS) merit-based system of promotion policy.
Hernandez was also represented by Dayadai Harripaul.
Weaver-Ali is being represented by Jagdeo Singh, Karina Singh, Keston Lewis, Savitri Samaroo, and Vashisht Seepersad.
Coreen Findley, Akeenie Murray and Kadine Matthew appeared alongside Dass for Harewood-Christopher and the AG’s Office.