JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, February 28, 2025

Legal fraternity defends Sturge’s right to enter political arena

by

38 days ago
20250121

Se­nior Re­porter/Pro­duc­er

akash.sama­roo@cnc3.co.tt

Mem­bers of the le­gal fra­ter­ni­ty have come to the de­fence of Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress To­co/San­gre Grande can­di­date Wayne Sturge, af­ter he came un­der fire for speak­ing out against crime hav­ing rep­re­sent­ed sus­pect­ed gang lead­ers and oth­er no­to­ri­ous peo­ple charged with heinous of­fences.

Dur­ing a war of words be­tween Sturge and Na­tion­al Trans­for­ma­tion Al­liance (NTA) leader Gary Grif­fith, the lat­ter said, “I have a lot of stan­dards for my­self ... I would nev­er be some­body as an at­tor­ney who will go out of my way to rep­re­sent every sin­gle ma­jor gang leader in this coun­try to en­sure they go out on bail af­ter be­ing charged for mur­der, kid­nap­ping, griev­ous bod­i­ly harm and il­le­gal weapons.”

Sturge had pre­vi­ous­ly crit­i­cised Grif­fith’s tenure as po­lice com­mis­sion­er, say­ing the now NTA leader took cred­it for a low mur­der rate when it may have been down to lock­down re­stric­tions dur­ing COVID-19.

But As­sem­bly of South­ern Lawyers (ASL) pres­i­dent Saira Lakhan yes­ter­day de­fend­ed Sturge’s right to prac­tise his pro­fes­sion while mak­ing a tran­si­tion in­to ac­tive pol­i­tics, not­ing it was not new.

“If a crim­i­nal at­tor­ney tran­si­tions in­to pol­i­tics, it can be ar­gued that it is a nat­ur­al pro­gres­sion of their com­mit­ment to jus­tice, fair­ness and the rule of law,” Lakhan said.

“For ex­am­ple, Prakash Ra­mad­har, Ramesh Lawrence Ma­haraj, who is a for­mer at­tor­ney gen­er­al of this coun­try, would have been one of those at­tor­neys who would have done crim­i­nal law sig­nif­i­cant­ly al­so for gangs and per­sons ac­cused of be­ing in­volved in drugs. So, de­fence at­tor­neys, like every­body else, have a job to do.”

Lakhan said she does not be­lieve any per­son should be pro­hib­it­ed from pol­i­tics be­cause of their pro­fes­sion.

At­tor­ney Om Lal­la mean­while said just be­cause an at­tor­ney rep­re­sents some­one who may ap­pear to the pub­lic to be an un­savoury char­ac­ter, it does not un­der­mine who they are.

“If all lawyers were to take a po­si­tion to say they would on­ly pick and choose who they want to rep­re­sent, the en­tire crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem would fall by the way­side,” Lal­la said.

“I don’t think any lawyer should be chas­tised for rep­re­sent­ing peo­ple be­fore the courts be­cause every­one is en­ti­tled to fair rep­re­sen­ta­tion, whether it is by pri­vate re­tain­er, le­gal aid or pub­lic de­fend­ers’ de­part­ment, the sys­tem can’t run ef­fi­cient­ly un­less peo­ple are rep­re­sent­ed.”

He be­lieves the crit­i­cism lev­elled against Sturge is un­fair, not­ing mem­bers of the pub­lic of­ten project their frus­tra­tions with the le­gal sys­tem on­to the lawyers.

“We have a prob­lem in the coun­try where the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem is not op­er­at­ing the way in which it should, and be­cause of the flaws in the sys­tem, many peo­ple get off due to tech­ni­cal­i­ties or be­cause of the in­ef­fi­cien­cies in the sys­tem and then lawyers will get blamed for it but you have to look at it holis­ti­cal­ly,” he posit­ed.

Lal­la said while any­one can be­come fair game in the po­lit­i­cal are­na, Sturge is not the first of his kind.

“Karl Hud­son- Phillips, Desmond Al­lum, Theodore Guer­ra, all have played pol­i­tics and all have rep­re­sent­ed peo­ple who may not have been the most savoury char­ac­ters,” he said.

Ra­jiv Per­sad SC al­so said it would be un­fair to as­sume a lawyer who rep­re­sents al­leged or con­vict­ed crim­i­nals can­not have an in­put in the na­tion­al dis­course on crime.

In fact, Per­sad said Sturge may be in an ad­van­ta­geous po­si­tion giv­en his ex­pe­ri­ence.

“His ex­pe­ri­ence as a lawyer in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem gives him a very good stand­point to be able to talk about jus­tice, crime and the work­ings of the sys­tem. Mr Sturge, who is en­ti­tled just as any oth­er lawyer to rep­re­sent who he wants, gives him a van­tage point that I think so­ci­ety as a whole can ben­e­fit from. It is good when we see peo­ple with that ex­pe­ri­ence putting them­selves up for pub­lic ser­vice. Every­one has a right to crit­i­cise and that is their en­ti­tle­ment,” Per­sad said.

But po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst Dr Shane Mo­hammed is of the view that while Sturge should not be ad­mon­ished for his clien­tele, it is time for him and Grif­fith to end to the pub­lic spat, as they run the risk of chas­ing away an elec­torate that wants to hear about so­lu­tions to crime.

“Let’s stop that non­sense. The rhetoric needs to end. Poli­cies and how we go about im­ple­ment­ing those poli­cies that fix our so­ci­ety is what is go­ing to cause peo­ple to start pay­ing at­ten­tion and tak­ing po­lit­i­cal par­ties se­ri­ous­ly, and if peo­ple can­not do that ef­fec­tive­ly, then God help us,” Mo­hammed ar­gued.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored