JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

Mitchell dismisses criticism of new-look Coat of Arms

'The majority of people are in favour of it’

by

KAY-MARIE FLETCHER
35 days ago
20250122

KAY-MARIE FLETCH­ER

Se­nior Re­porter

kay-marie.fletch­er@guardian.co.tt

De­bate on the Na­tion­al Em­blems (Amend­ment) Bill 2025 end­ed in the Sen­ate yes­ter­day evening with the bill be­ing passed.

Af­ter be­ing passed in the Low­er House last week, the bill sought to rat­i­fy the ad­di­tion of the steel­pan on the Coat of Arms while re­mov­ing Christo­pher Colum­bus’s three ships.

While the pub­lic has been crit­i­cal of jew­eller Gillian Bish­op’s re-de­sign of the Coat of Arms, there were mixed views from sen­a­tors.

Lead­ing the charge in sup­port of the re-de­sign, Min­is­ter of Tourism, Cul­ture and the Arts Ran­dall Mitchell said it’s all about artis­tic ex­pres­sion.

Be­fore the de­bate, he told Guardian Me­dia, “It’s a de­sign. There is noth­ing that di­vides opin­ion like art and artis­tic ex­pres­sion. I’m see­ing a lot of peo­ple who are in favour of it. In fact, the ma­jor­i­ty of peo­ple are in favour of it. Whether they like the de­sign, some peo­ple think it should be sil­ver. Some peo­ple feel it should be a dif­fer­ent type of pan. Some peo­ple feel there should be more than one pan. It’s artis­tic ex­pres­sion.”

Asked how much it cost tax­pay­ers, he said he did not know since the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter was re­spon­si­ble for the change.

In­side the Sen­ate, Mitchell said it would not cost hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars to re­place the em­blem on of­fi­cial doc­u­ments.

He al­so said cit­i­zens will not need to rush to get their pass­ports and oth­er le­gal doc­u­ments changed.

“There will be a cost to change phys­i­cal sig­nage, stick­ers on ve­hi­cles. There would be a cost to is­sue the phys­i­cal re­pro­duc­tions of the Coat of Arms, etc. But the idea that you would have to im­me­di­ate­ly change out the en­tire mon­ey sup­ply to the tune of hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars is sim­ply false. There will be no un­due heavy fi­nan­cial bur­den to the tax­pay­er once the tran­si­tion is prop­er­ly man­aged and once these mea­sures are ac­cept­ed and passed.”

Be­fore the de­bate, Guardian Me­dia spoke to 13 sen­a­tors out­side the Par­lia­ment yes­ter­day. Sev­er­al in­de­pen­dent and op­po­si­tion sen­a­tors were in sup­port of the new look.

Op­po­si­tion Sen­a­tor Anil Roberts said, “The one sub­ject I was not good at in school is Art, so I leave that for those who have skills in art and de­sign and so on. I think that the steel­pan is long over­due for re­spect and be­ing on the Coat of Arms is a good thing. How­ev­er, it’s quite su­per­fi­cial ... while the Coat of Arms may look ab­solute­ly beau­ti­ful, what about in­vest­ment in pan?”

Oth­er op­po­si­tion sen­a­tors like Wade Mark, Dami­an Ly­der and Jayan­ti Lutch­me­di­al-Ram­di­al ex­pressed some sup­port to­ward the pan be­ing placed on the Coat of Arms, though they al­so had strong views about Gov­ern­ment’s sup­port of the pan fra­ter­ni­ty dur­ing the de­bate.

In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tor An­tho­ny Vieira, SC said, “I am in favour of it. I think it’s a sym­bol of uni­ty and in­no­va­tion of our peo­ple.”

In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tor Dr Ger­ard Hutchin­son said, “I sup­port the con­cept. I think the idea is worth­while. I think, though, there may be oth­er means by which we could im­prove our con­cept of na­tion­al iden­ti­ty. I am not a de­sign ex­pert. It seemed ok.”

Mean­while, In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tor Paul Richards said, “Yes, I am sat­is­fied. Every­one will have a sub­jec­tive in­ter­pre­ta­tion ar­tis­ti­cal­ly. Every­body will think it should have been sil­ver, it should have been gold, it should have been pink, it should have been blue. But, to me what I saw was a prop­er in­ter­pre­ta­tion of the steel­pan and that’s what’s im­por­tant.”

In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tor De­oroop Teemal said, “The de­sign is in­tend­ed to cap­ture the na­tion­al in­stru­ment, which it has done. It has more or less re­tained the oth­er as­pects. Why make some­thing com­pli­cat­ed when it could be sim­ple and send the in­tend­ed mes­sage.”

How­ev­er, oth­ers were not quite im­pressed.

In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tor Dr Shar­da Patasar said she was, “A bit un­der­whelmed” with the new look.

Her col­league on the In­de­pen­dent bench Suni­ty Ma­haraj said she be­lieves the artis­tic com­mu­ni­ty should have been more in­volved.

Ma­haraj said, “This is some­thing that re­al­ly re­quired wide­spread con­sul­ta­tion and in­put, and I would have liked to know that the artis­tic com­mu­ni­ty, the peo­ple who’ve in­vest­ed, who are in­vest­ed in im­agery were a crit­i­cal part of it.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored