JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, March 14, 2025

No bail for cops facing trial for Moruga triple murder

by

652 days ago
20230601

Se­nior Re­porter

derek.achong@guardian.co.tt

Six po­lice of­fi­cers ac­cused of mur­der­ing three friends in Moru­ga in 2011, will have to re­main on re­mand as their tri­al be­gins to­day. 

De­liv­er­ing a judg­ment yes­ter­day, the Court of Ap­peal dis­missed a con­sol­i­dat­ed ap­peal brought by the six of­fi­cers and an­oth­er man, Keros Mar­tin, who is ac­cused of an un­re­lat­ed mur­der. 

It was a split de­ci­sion with Ap­pel­late Judges Nolan Bereaux and Maria Wil­son agree­ing that the Court of Ap­peal did not have the ju­ris­dic­tion to hear ap­peals over judges’ de­ci­sions not to grant mur­der ac­cused bail. Jus­tice Ron­nie Boodoos­ingh pro­vid­ed a dis­sent­ing judg­ment in which he ex­pressed the view that he and his Court of Ap­peal col­leagues had the ju­ris­dic­tion to en­ter­tain such ap­peals. 

Jus­tice Boodoos­ingh al­so ruled that the judge, who de­nied the of­fi­cers bail, ex­er­cised his dis­cre­tion wrong­ly based on their analy­sis of the le­gal is­sues and facts in the case. 

He ruled that he would have grant­ed each of the of­fi­cers $700,000 bail and would have re­mit­ted Mar­tin’s case for fur­ther con­sid­er­a­tion. 

Sgt Khem­raj Sa­hadeo and PCs Re­nal­do Re­viero, Glenn Singh, Roger Nicholas, Safraz Ju­man, and An­to­nio Ra­madin are ac­cused of mur­der­ing Alana Dun­can, Ker­ron Ec­cles, and Abi­gail John­son on Ju­ly 22, 2011. 

Dun­can, 27, of Dun­can Vil­lage, San Fer­nan­do, Ec­cles, 29, and 20-year-old John­son, both of St Mary’s Vil­lage, Moru­ga, were in Dun­can’s ve­hi­cle when it was stopped by the of­fi­cers at the cor­ner of Rochard Dou­glas Road and Gun­ness Trace in Bar­rack­pore. 

Ini­tial re­ports claimed that the friends shot at the of­fi­cers, who re­turned fire. 

A fe­male col­league was ini­tial­ly charged along­side her for­mer col­leagues from the San Fer­nan­do Rob­bery Squad but the charge was dropped and re­placed with a less­er charge of con­spir­a­cy to per­vert the course of jus­tice af­ter she agreed to tes­ti­fy against them. 

In Ju­ly 2013, the of­fi­cers were com­mit­ted to stand tri­al at the end of their pre­lim­i­nary in­quiry. 

Rel­a­tives of the three friends brought a law­suit against the State over their wrong­ful deaths and are each seek­ing over $2 mil­lion in com­pen­sa­tion. 

The case went to tri­al in 2018 but had to be re­as­signed to an­oth­er judge af­ter Jus­tice Kevin Ram­cha­ran re­cused him­self from the case based on the fact that the fam­i­lies’ lawyer Kei­th Scot­land rep­re­sent­ed him in an un­re­lat­ed mat­ter. 

The case was re­as­signed to an­oth­er High Court Judge but was not de­ter­mined as he was sub­se­quent­ly el­e­vat­ed to the Court of Ap­peal. That case is still pend­ing. 

The po­lice of­fi­cers’ case is list­ed for tri­al be­fore High Court Judge Car­la Brown-An­toine to­day. 

On Tues­day, Se­nior Coun­sel Is­rael Khan, who is lead­ing the of­fi­cers’ le­gal team, took is­sue with the O’Meara Ju­di­cial Cen­tre be­ing utilised for the tri­al. 

While Khan ad­mit­ted that a no­tice in the Gazette was is­sued on Mon­day des­ig­nat­ing the cen­tre as a lo­ca­tion for Supreme Court mat­ters, he not­ed that the Crim­i­nal Pro­ce­dure Act on­ly al­lowed tri­als in Port-of-Spain and San Fer­nan­do. 

“Even the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions (DPP) can­not trans­fer this mat­ter to Ari­ma or Siparia. There is a la­cu­na in the law and the Ju­di­cia­ry can­not fix it by pro­claim­ing a Gazette,” Khan said. 

He al­so chal­lenged Jus­tice Brown-An­toine to hold him in con­tempt of court for his threat to with­hold par­tic­i­pa­tion. 

In a press re­lease is­sued on Mon­day, the Ju­di­cia­ry not­ed that the tri­al was set af­ter con­sul­ta­tions with pros­e­cu­tors and the of­fi­cers’ de­fence team since the case was as­signed to Jus­tice Brown-An­toine in Jan­u­ary 2019. 

“Since that time, the mat­ter has been the sub­ject of case man­age­ment by the judge and mas­ter with the par­tic­i­pa­tion of both the pros­e­cu­tion and de­fence,” the re­lease said.

“In this case, the tri­al date was fixed at a hear­ing on Mon­day, Feb­ru­ary 27, 2023, with the agree­ment of both the pros­e­cu­tion and the de­fence,” it added. 

The of­fi­cers are al­so be­ing rep­re­sent­ed by Ul­ric Sker­ritt. Mar­tin was rep­re­sent­ed by Criston J Williams, Blaine So­bri­an, and Jade Mar­tinez. 

Nigel Pil­grim and As­sis­tant DPP Sab­ri­na Dougdeen-Jaglal rep­re­sent­ed the DPP’s Of­fice. 

The Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al was rep­re­sent­ed by Fyard Ho­sein, SC, Rishi Dass, SC, and Nicol Yee Fung.

The Law As­so­ci­a­tion, which pro­vid­ed sub­mis­sions on the ap­peal as it sets a le­gal prece­dent, was rep­re­sent­ed by Se­nior Coun­sel Dou­glas Mendes, Ra­jiv Per­sad, John Heath, and at­tor­ney Pe­ter Carter. 

The Crim­i­nal Bar As­so­ci­a­tion’s le­gal team in­clud­ed Daniel Khan and Ula Nathai-Lutch­man.   


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored