JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, May 13, 2025

PNM ahead in crucial Toco/Grande seat

by

1739 days ago
20200807

SHAL­IZA HAS­SANALI

On the eve of Mon­day’s Gen­er­al Elec­tion, Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment (PNM) To­co/San­gre Grande can­di­date Roger Mon­roe is out front against Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC) con­tender Nabi­la Greene in the bat­tle for the high­ly-con­test­ed seat.

The find­ings are con­tained in a re­cent poll con­duct­ed by HHB and As­so­ciates Ltd poll led by poll­ster Louis Bertrand.

The poll, com­mis­sioned by Guardian Me­dia, showed Munroe was ahead of Greene by 13 per cent.

To­co/San­gre Grande was one of six mar­gin­al con­stituen­cies un­der­tak­en by the firm lead­ing up to the Au­gust 10 gen­er­al elec­tion.

The poll’s mar­gin of er­ror is six per cent.

In­ter­views were con­duct­ed with 200 reg­is­tered vot­ers in the con­stituen­cy on var­i­ous cat­e­gories rang­ing from ma­jor is­sues in­flu­enc­ing the vote, par­ty best ca­pa­ble of solv­ing prob­lems, gen­er­al progress of the coun­try and peo­ple, per­for­mance in the con­stituen­cy, as­sess­ment of can­di­dates, opin­ions of can­di­dates, rea­sons for the rat­ings, vot­ing in­ten­tions and vot­er switch­ing pat­terns.

UNC Toco/Sangre Grande candidate Nabila Greene speaks with a resident during a walkabout in Sangre Grande.

UNC Toco/Sangre Grande candidate Nabila Greene speaks with a resident during a walkabout in Sangre Grande.

ABRAHAM DIAZ

Dur­ing the elec­tion cam­paign, both can­di­dates have been em­broiled in con­tro­ver­sy.

Three weeks ago, a video sur­faced on so­cial me­dia pur­port­ing to be Greene ly­ing on a bed be­ing show­ered with mon­ey by a male whose face was not seen. But ini­tial­ly, Greene, in an in­ter­view with Guardian Me­dia dur­ing a walk­a­bout in San­gre Grande, said if the per­son in the video turned out to be her, she saw noth­ing wrong with the clip. The fol­low­ing day, how­ev­er, Greene took to so­cial me­dia deny­ing she was the per­son in the video.

Re­cent­ly, TTPS Fraud Squad de­tec­tives re­opened their in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to al­le­ga­tions that Mon­roe al­leged­ly used an ex­pired pow­er of at­tor­ney to with­draw mon­ey from his grand­fa­ther Per­cy Thomas’ ac­count two days af­ter he (Thomas) died on Feb­ru­ary 7, 2015. While Mon­roe ad­mit­ted he made a mis­take in the mat­ter, he in­sist­ed his hands are clean.

This seat along the north­east­ern re­gion of Trinidad has been known as a PNM strong­hold for decades.

TOCO POLL TABLE 5

TOCO POLL TABLE 5

In 2002, the con­stituen­cy, which ini­tial­ly car­ried the name To­co/Man­zanil­la, was won by PNM can­di­date Roger Boynes.

Five years lat­er, PNM’s In­dra Sinanan Ojah-Ma­haraj emerged vic­to­ri­ous over UNC’s ri­val Keshore Satram.

The UNC fi­nal­ly took con­trol of the seat in 2010 when can­di­date Ru­pert Grif­fith cap­tured 9,325 votes to PNM’s Er­ic “Pink Pan­ther” Tay­lor, who net­ted 8,625 bal­lots.

In 2015, the seat went back in­to the PNM’s hands with Glen­da Jen­nings-Smith re­ceiv­ing 12,005 votes to the 8,101 elec­tors who sup­port­ed UNC’s can­di­date Brent San­cho.

The re­gion has a vot­ing pop­u­la­tion of over 30,000 and is re­gard­ed as a cru­cial seat for both par­ties at the polls.

Re­spon­dents were asked which par­ty they would vote for. The poll showed that “32 per cent” re­port­ed the PNM to the UNC’s “19 per cent.”

TOCO POLL TABLE 6

TOCO POLL TABLE 6

At the time of the poll, “24 per cent” were un­de­cid­ed, “11 per cent” re­fused to say which par­ty they would sup­port and “13 per cent” stat­ed they would re­frain from vot­ing.

The poll gave a 67 per cent “rel­a­tive­ly high” like­li­hood of vot­ing among elec­tors.

In terms of “favoura­bil­i­ty”, Mon­roe re­ceived a 45 per cent rat­ing to Greene’s 32 per cent. Al­so, more re­spon­dents were un­sure about Greene (60 per cent) when com­pared to Mon­roe’s (48 per cent).

How­ev­er, a sig­nif­i­cant­ly high­er per­cent­age of elec­tors (40 per cent) rat­ed Mon­roe as “car­ing about peo­ple than his UNC coun­ter­part (29 per cent)”, the poll stat­ed.

Vot­ers felt both can­di­dates were “tied” with re­spect to “do­ing a good job.”

On things dis­liked about the can­di­dates, re­spon­dents stat­ed “Mon­roe’s main prob­lems seem to be that he is per­ceived as not be­ing seen of­ten enough in the con­stituen­cy (39 per cent)”. Elec­tors felt that Greene on the oth­er hand “is not do­ing a good job (36 per cent).”

TOCO POLL TABLE 7

TOCO POLL TABLE 7

Re­gard­ing which can­di­date is more pop­u­lar, the sur­vey found that “Mon­roe is more well-known (76 per cent) in the con­stituen­cy than Greene (67 per cent).”

Look­ing at the per­for­mance of both par­ties, re­spon­dents gave the PNM a 47 per cent “good” rat­ing com­pared to the UNC’s 20 per cent. How­ev­er, 29 per cent felt the PNM had done a “bad” job to the UNC’s 34 per cent.

Com­par­ing their lives now to 2015, 32 per cent of vot­ers re­port­ed they were per­son­al­ly worse off. Some 37 per cent mean­while claimed that their per­son­al sit­u­a­tion had not changed, with 29 per cent say­ing they were bet­ter off.

Delv­ing deep­er in­to the cat­e­go­ry “vot­ing in­ten­tions”, the sur­vey found that race con­tin­ues to be im­por­tant in this con­stituen­cy.

“The ma­jor dif­fer­ence re­lates to those clas­si­fied as mixed/oth­er where 42 per cent in­tend to vote for the PNM as com­pared with the 15 per cent who in­tend to vote for the UNC. In­ter­est­ing­ly, the Afro/In­do dif­fer­ences are less sig­nif­i­cant.

TOCO POLL TABLE 8

TOCO POLL TABLE 8

For ex­am­ple, (34 per cent) of Afro-Tri­nis in­tend to vote for the PNM with 16 per cent in­tend­ing to vote for the UNC,” the sur­vey stat­ed.

The poll al­so dis­cov­ered that while 33 per cent of In­do-Tri­nis in­tend to vote for the UNC,12 per cent in­tend to vote for the PNM.

Com­par­ing how re­spon­dents vot­ed in the 2015 gen­er­al elec­tion to how they in­tend to vote on Mon­day, it showed that 68 per cent of those who vot­ed for the PNM five years ago in­tend to do so again in 2020. This com­pares with the 55 per cent of those who vot­ed for the UNC in 2015 in­tend­ing to do so in this elec­tion.

“Sig­nif­i­cant­ly, 41 per cent of past UNC vot­ers are un­de­cid­ed about who they will vote for in 2020. This com­pares with 16 per cent of past PNM vot­ers who are un­de­cid­ed.”

The three most im­por­tant is­sues re­spon­dents stat­ed are like­ly to in­flu­ence which par­ty they vote for are un­em­ploy­ment (98 per cent), health care (97 per cent) and COVID-19 (97 per cent).

As to which par­ty has been best ca­pa­ble of solv­ing prob­lems, the PNM was seen as most ca­pa­ble in deal­ing with health care, hous­ing, pub­lic trans­port, ed­u­ca­tion and road re­pairs, which re­ceived rat­ings up­ward of 40 per cent.

TOCO POLL TABLE 9

TOCO POLL TABLE 9

Poll’s method­ol­o­gy

The polling di­vi­sions (PDs) were grouped by loy­al­ty to the UNC/PNM.

Loy­al PDs were iden­ti­fied as those in which the win­ning par­ty had a dif­fer­ence from the los­er of 15 per cent or greater.

All oth­er PDs were deemed to be “mar­gin­al.”

This al­lowed HHB and As­so­ciates to se­lect small­er sam­ples from “loy­al” polling di­vi­sions and larg­er sam­ples from “mar­gin­al” di­vi­sions.

The de­mo­graph­ic char­ac­ter­is­tics of the sam­ple with re­spect to age, gen­der, race and re­li­gion re­flect the poll­ster’s es­ti­mate of the char­ac­ter­is­tics of the con­stituen­cy as a whole.

TOCO POLL TABLE 10

TOCO POLL TABLE 10

TOCO POLL TABLE 11

TOCO POLL TABLE 11

TOCO POLL TABLE 12

TOCO POLL TABLE 12

TOCO POLL TABLE 13

TOCO POLL TABLE 13

TOCO POLL TABLE 14

TOCO POLL TABLE 14

TOCO POLL TABLE 16

TOCO POLL TABLE 16


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored