- Last update:8 hours 49 min ago
PM, Security Minister blank budget debate
Senior government Ministers and front-line Opposition MPs have not contributed to the 2009/10 national budget debate, which is expected to conclude today.
Prime Minister Patrick Manning, National Security Minister Martin Joseph, Education Minister Esther Le Gendre and Opposition MPs Vasant Bharath and Dr Roodal Moonilal, Ramesh Maharaj and Kelvin Ramnath did not speak in the debate. Maharaj and Ramnath were absent from the Parliament during the debate. Yesterday, Chief Whip Dr Hamza Rafeeq said: “We decided not to allow Rudy and Vasant to speak because the ministers they were planning to respond to did not speak. So there was nothing to respond to.”
Rafeeq said House Leader Colm Imbert told him that he wanted to conclude the debate on Monday. Raffeq said he questioned why many of the senior government ministers, including National Security Minister Joseph, did not speak in the debate. He noted that Finance Minister Karen Tesheira, in presenting the budget two Mondays ago, promised that Joseph would elaborate on the Government’s initiatives to fight crime. Rafeeq said he told Imbert it was up to him to decide when the debate closes. He said the UNC won the debate as the Government did not defend adequately the measures contained in the budget. “We are satisfied that we did well in our contributions,” Rafeeq added.
Rafeeq said Moonilal and Bharath would contribute to the debate on two budget-related matters later today, the Provisional Collection of Taxes Order and the Excise Duty (Amendment) Order.
Shortly after one o’clock yesterday morning, the 12-hour session ended, when Finance Minister Karen Tesheira started her wind-up of the debate. She said a release issued by Standards & Poor’s Rating Services clearly indicated that everything’s not bad in the T&T economy. Earlier, Opposition MP Chandresh Sharma was very critical of the Government claiming discrimination against East Indians in all aspects of life in T&T. He was in turn criticised by Government backbencher Indra Sinanan Ojah-Maharaj, who said she was disappointed of his claim because he “Sharma “was one of us.”
MP for Oropouche West Mickela Panday brought the House to laughter when PM Manning asked her a question about gender budgeting. She responded: “That is why your are there (on Government benches) and we are here (on Opposition benches). Panday told Manning that the answer was for him to determine as he was in Government. Debate on the budget is scheduled to begin in the Senate on Tuesday.
Those who contributed to the 2009/10 budget debate:
• Finance Minister Karen Tesheira
• Opposition Leader Basdeo Panday
• Information Minister Neil Parsanlal
• Opposition MP Dr Tim Gopeesingh
• Labour Minister Rennie Dumas
• Opposition MP Winston Peters
• Public Administration Minister Kennedy Swaratsingh
• Opposition MP Nizam Baksh
• Sports Minister Gary Hunt
• Opposition MP Harry Partap
• Legal Affairs Minister Peter Taylor
• Government MP Anthony Roberts
• Opposition MP Kamla Persad-Bissessar
• Government MP Dr Keith Rowley
• Opposition MP Subhas Panday
• Health Minister Jerry Narace
• Opposition Chief Whip Dr Hamza Rafeeq
• Government MP Fitzgerald Jeffrey
• Opposition MP Mickela Panday
• Social Development Minister Dr Amery Browne
• Opposition MP Chandresh Sharma
• Tourism Minister Joseph Ross
• Energy Minister Conrad Enill
• Opposition MP Jack Warner
• Foreign Affairs Minister Paula Gopee-Scoon
• Public Utilities Minister Mustapha Abdul-Hamid
• Works and Transport Minister Colm Imbert
• Government MP Indra Sinanan Ojah-Maharaj
Manning can’t talk no
Manning can’t talk no more, like you have not seen the news on the US Government Site, Manning your days numbered. Now I hope the Big Boys in the PNM watching!
http://www.nationalterroralert.com/updates/2009/09/13/trinidad-prime-min...
ryan,that site you quoted is
ryan,that site you quoted is NOT a U.S Government Site as you would like us to believe. Stop the propaganda especially with false information.The site is a private site written by misinformation mongers like yourself.
http://www.nationalterroraler
http://www.nationalterroralert.com/updates/2009/09/13/trinidad-ag-says-p...
read the link now, manning call them.
but then read this link
http://www.newsday.com/news/new-york/probe-of-possible-ties-to-group-in-...
The Associated Press
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CB_TRINIDAD_CORRUPTION_ALLEGATION...
Read the Express
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_news?id=161532462
This is what came over the Associated Press today, Y is the express saying the same, Because Manning call the people, does not mean it was not on the News Feeds.
You fool do you know who is
You fool do you know who is the The Associated Press, go tell the Express that.
Sorry to revert to the
Sorry to revert to the subject, but no harm in a gentle reminder, I hope. Like I've suggested before, we must be civil and respect the views of others without rancour or bitterness even if we don't agree with them. Let's be professional, even when poking fun at the politicians. Do not let our irritations and impatience get the better of us in dealing with fellow-bloggers. Like the e-mails we send, words once spoken (or even written) cannot be deleted or recalled once transmitted. There's room and space enough for all of us on planet Earth, and on this website. Please let us maintain some decorum in our exchanges. I enjoy reading your views and your lively wit and insights so let's keep it light, cheery and sober even when venting our spleen about the serious problems facing our country. Let's hope when the time comes, we all know where to mark the "X", if not, we are just spitting in the wind.
Peace and goodwill to all from the Prince.
http://www.google.com/search?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1T4GPCK_enUS299US299&defl=en&q=de...
What is the problem.
go tell that to satmo, since
go tell that to satmo, since the Express also carried the article of the accosicated press, i did not publish it, so want to attack me, no go attack the AP.
ryan,unfortunately you have
ryan,unfortunately you have lost ALL focus on the discussion at hand.In your posting you stated that a U.S. Government Site made certain statements.I was only telling you that the site you referred to is NOT a U.S.Government Site.You are here now lamenting about the Express and who knows AP.The reports in both instances centered around exactly what was said in the courts and parliament of Trinidad & Tobago not any misinformed headliner claims like was done on nationalterroralert.com.For your further information, the story on that site was "Removed with an apology" in case you did not know.If you want to maintain your blinkers and not pay attention to what you read and then come up with "tabloid" ranting and raving,so be it if that's what tickles your ego.If you want open, well thought out, decent discussion then like "The Prince" said,peace and goodwill to all.
Sorry was preoccupied did
Sorry was preoccupied did not read the entire post, I got the story of the RSS news feed, then when I looked at the express they said the name the of the website used on the express is the same name of the center in the usa as seen on CNN posting the terror alert, sorry if I assumed the express meant the government website, but as I said I did not write the article on any of the feeds, so the writer cannot accuse me of propaganda, he can take that up with the websites listed above, the same way Manning did, the website changed their statement by 12.00 pm, after saying they got a statement from Manning.
The Name of the website that carried the story is National Terror Alert, the express said Under the National Terror Alert Response Center this is the USA government. Now the same website RSS News feeds were put on Michigan State Website, and many other USA websites.
On Newsday.com around 11.00 pm I found the original source - The Associated Press, who distribute most of the news that are read worldwide, who have not changed their statement, the same story was listed on a posted by another blogger the day before. The media houses are where we get the news, so I cannot be held responsible for the Media.
So therefore the only error I have made is the assumption that the express was talking about http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/Copy_of_press_release_0046.shtm, US Department of Homeland Security.
So in reality the article is still on the Associated Press the original source.
The Prince
The Prince
I love your style! (^_^)
La Diva
Since we talking about all
Since we talking about all this manning say last bomb in Trinidad was not terrorist, has it ever been solved?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4673879.stm
Who is Mr Big, Manning?
http://uncnothingyet.ning.com
http://uncnothingyet.ning.com/photo/parick-manning?context=latest
Why even have a budget
Why even have a budget debate?
Does anything different come of it?
I might be wrong, but as far as I recall, budget debates are just one big ramajay after the other, where its passed and life continues for us as normal. Well, they leave us a little poorer and a lot more robbed.
http://dsaltsman.blogspot.com/
SaltMan4Real, just talk!
SaltMan4Real, just talk!
And doh forget a waste of
And doh forget a waste of time.