Panday: Treat HCU as CL Financial

Published: 31 Oct 2009

Basdeo Panday

Hindu Credit Union depositors must get back their money, since the PNM Government has been negligent on the HCU matter and is responsible for depositors’ losses, Opposition Leader Basdeo Panday declared yesterday. Panday made the point while piloting a motion in his name during yesterday’s House of Representatives’ sitting, which a number of HCU depositors attended.Building a case for Government to provide a bailout plan for HCU as it did for CL Financial depositors, Panday said the HCU dilemma was Government’s fault.

He said the state had a moral and legal obligation to compensate those who had suffered, due to its failure to heed the HCU situation when hints of problems first arose seven years ago. “My concern is that HCU depositors do not lose their money, since their suffering is comparable to and equal to all who put their money in financial institutions and lose them,” Panday said. Panday contended that Government was negligent in handling the HCU situation, having failed to perform the required supervisory and investigative duties. He said Government ministers had known since 2002 the HCU was in trouble since two ministers had made statements on the issue. Panday said in 2004, depositors had also written the Commissioner of Credit Unions seeking to get their HCU funds and one depositor eventually went to court. Panday noted the concerns of Justice James Aboud in the matter.

Government, Panday contended, thereby deceived depositors and misled potential depositors who are now today’s victims of the Government’s negligence on the HCU. Panday said points made by the Finance Minister earlier in the year on the CLF bailout plan should also apply to the HCU issue since the HCU had suffered the same illiquidity problem. Noting that Government was injecting $5billion into CLF, Panday said the HCU only required $400 million. Panday said HCU depositors were equal human beings and should have equitable treatment by the state. He said Government had a moral and constitutional duty to treat all citizens equally and must protect HCU depositors as they did CLF investors. Panday urged HCU investors to keep their deposit documents safe, since a UNC Government would ensure that every depositor secures their money. “You know when the UNC makes a promise we keep it—our record of performance is living testimony,” Panday declared.

Article Tools
 

CNC3 POLL

CNC3 POLL -

Last Nights CNC3 Poll 87% felt they should get back their money, I thought it was going to be closer to 60%.

Yes treat them all the same

Yes treat them all the same - find out all who benefited illegally from depositors monies and jail them!! I am not hearing any criminal charges for any of the CL financial directors or bigwigs. Payback all bonuses. Our attitude should be about letting people off. And those depositors too - greed caused them to go and put their monies there are not all innocent victims either. IF they had benefited significantly from those schemes no one would have batted an eye. NO body is looking at this thing objectively. That's why Trinidad has to be the smartman capital of the world.

LOL ! A UNC GOVT , WHEN

LOL ! A UNC GOVT , WHEN ?
Basdeo Panday is making sure that the PNM remains in POWER and he remains as the Opposition Leader , so the promises he is making will never ever be realised . Panday owns the UNC so he is not leaving and his minions are going to keep him as the political leader .
Panday is "trying a thing" because he knows that the 2 situations are not the same . The govt of T&T has taken over CL Finacial and if the CLF is liquidated , the govt can recover the bailout money . On the other hand , where are the assets/security of the Hindu Credit Union ? Who was in-charge of the HCU ? How will the tax-payers money be recovered ? The Finance Minister said that the govt tried really hard to assist the HCU but did not got the co-operation that was required . Panday was grand-standing in order to make the members of the HCU feel that he has their interest at heart . Panday has many cases in the courts and he may even end up in jail , again - therefore , he is looking for sympathy from the Hindu Community .
ATW-Barbados .

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

CONFLICT OF INTEREST -

WIGGINS

You are correct again,

1) The Minister and her family had money in CLICO but none in HCU.
2) The investments in CLICO were in the millions, big shots, those in HCU were in the hundreds, poor people.
3) The investors in CLICO are mainly Africans and most likely PNM, whereas those in the HCU mainy Indians and most likely UNC, RAMJACK or COP.

Panday did omit to mention these differences. Jack also felt that the HCU should have been bailed out. Imagine Panday and Jack agreeing on something. But we know that Jack would never deceive anyone.

PS: You forgot your mantra “Panday is the BANE of the UNC”, I missed it.

Fairplay , I am going with

Fairplay , I am going with the Minister of Finance on this issue and remember that the bill was tabled by Panday and he had plenty members of the HCU in the visitors gallery . I am sure that you have already read the Minister's reply to this issue , and I am showing solidarity with her position . I empathise with the HCU members and I hope that a solution can be found to assist them .
Mr. Austin 'Jack' Warner has already offered a solution to the HCU problems but it was rejected - but maybe Jack will try again .
ATW-Barbados .

WHO IS STOPPING HER

WHO IS STOPPING HER -

Why dosen't she go ahead and help. We are talking about four hundred thousand HCU as opposed to 5-8 billion and counting CLICO . Are we sure that we are going to recoup out investment in CLICO.Billions in cost overruns in UDECOTT no problem.

HCU,CLICO,Sir Allan

HCU,CLICO,Sir Allan Stanford, Madoff and Charles Ponzi, what do all of them have in common? Many people lost billions of US dollars worth of assets in their organizations or companies in which they were involved.

In an interview published in today's nytimes online, Madoff confesses to scheming billions right under the noses of the Securities and Exchange Commission officials. With respect to our local people, since I don't have any evidence whatsoever, I cannot lump Messrs Harry Harnarine of the HCU and Mr Lawrence Duprey of Clico in the same boat as Madoff, Stanford and Ponzi because then I could be totally wrong. Unlike Messrs Allan Stanford, Bernard Madoff and Charles Ponzi, these aforementioned local financial gentlemen may not be in any money scheme at all and may be totally innocent of any financial wrongdoing.

However, people's money which was deposited in both CLICO and HCU seems to be lost, or at best, under a dark cloud of suspicion and uncertainty.

This brings me to the question of Mr Panday's motion in Friday's TT Parliament. Now, I didn't read or hear the full contribution, but taken out of context, it may seem that he's favouring a government payoff of HCU depositors. With that I unreservedly agree, with one caveat, that the Executive investigate (Mr Bob Lindquist, where are you?) and prosecute anyone who may have stolen depositors' money and other assets.

Nevertheless, the more fundamental questions are: if indeed somebody or bodies did scheme people out of their monies, then who are these people? Was it organized? Where is the evidence of wrongdoing? Did the government regulators supervise these companies diligently or at all? Is any meaningful investigation taking place to uncover any wrongdoing if there is any? Are any laws going to be passed and enforced to ensure that depositors' money in Credit Unions, UTC, Insurance Companies as well as Finance Houses is covered by the Deposit Insurance Scheme?

In the end, again, it may be that everybody in this mess, including Messrs Harnarine and (L)Duprey, could be either guilty or innocent. Who knows?

At least Bernard Madoff and Charles Ponzi were caught, prosecuted and jailed, and Stanford is in jail awaiting trial. But, is anybody in Trinidad and Tobago who mishandled both HCU and CLICO depositor's money going to be caught and prosecuted? That, I thought, would have been the focus of the legislator, Oppostion Leader, M.P. Mr B. Panday on Friday in Parliament.
ajfyzabadbutlertown

I agree that the depositors

I agree that the depositors should get back their money but it must be ensured that Harry spends time in jail for scheming people out of their hard-earned cash.

Wiggins, Panday will sort

Wiggins, Panday will sort this whole lot out when we get back into Govt. You watch my words.

My view from the beginning

My view from the beginning was that if the Government through the relevant authorities such as the Central Bank, the Ministries of Finance and Labour were negligent or culpable in not properly regulating and monitoring this failed financial institution, then the Government may have a moral, if not a legal obligation to rescue the depositors. The Government might well be guilty of acts of omission in this instance.

Maybe the depositors should join in a class action and seek compensation through the Courts. And if there are guilty parties in HCU & CLICO who were involved in "white collar" crime they should be made to face the music.

If Panday is serious about helping these poor people, why doesn't he team up with his erstwhile pal Ramesh to provide legal advice/assistance to these unfortunate depositors who have lost their money? Maybe Jack can help underwrite the lawsuit. They might serve the country better this way than throwing political punches at one another in public.

I agree that the government

I agree that the government failed to properly regulate the movement to avoid this collapse. It appears too that the Supervisor of Credit Unions did not act in a timely manner; if he did the collapse may have been avoided or not as significant. HCU did not have deposit insurance with the relevant authority, so the risk was even greater. Government should (for the time being) at least assist the depositors by the extent to which they would have been covered if they were insured and launch a full scale investigation into the conduct of the credit unions business.

Same as with Lehman Bros and

Same as with Lehman Bros and with Merrill Lynch as well as with AIG. The govt cant bail out every institution but must make a decision as to which post a greater risk of financial contagion. Lehman Bros was allowed to fail and Merrill Lynch was forced into the arms of another (stronger) financial institution and AIG was bailed out. Here is a snapshot of what the finance minister, Nunez-Tesheira, addressing the issue of the CLICO bailout, "Nunez-Tesheira said Government did not assist CL Financial but was acting in accordance with its responsibility under the law to manage the economy. She said the systematic risk which a CL Financial collapse posed to the rest of the economy was a critical factor. Government intervention was to prevent the contagion effect -the problem of CL Financial spreading to other financial institutions-thereby putting at risk the whole financial system.

She noted the CL Financial Group controlled over US$100 billion in assets and had financial interest in several industries, including banking, real estate, energy, general and life insurance, manufacturing, retail, distributive, media and medical services. She said CLICO controlled 52 per cent of the insurance industry, owned 55 per cent of the largest bank and 49 per cent of the total assets of the non-banking sector." taken from Trinidad Express

Don S. NY

NOBODY IS SAYING BAIL OUT

NOBODY IS SAYING BAIL OUT EVERYBODY -

We are saying be consistent. We have cable TV and I see Americans and the president saying the same. Many complained that Wall Street who caused the problem was bailed out but not Main Street who was dumped on. To bail out HCU is 400 million; the bailout of CLICO was 5-8 billion and counting. We do not know if we will recoup our investment. There are billions in overruns in UDECOTT. Are we rewarding the major screw-up who happens to be our financial contributors and family, while penalising the smaller infractions. There are the obvious conflicts of interest, of the Minister. CLICO was a financier of both PNM and UNC. Stop spinning you will get giddy.

Don S, You are correct. CL

Don S,
You are correct. CL Financial poses a serious systemic risk to the entire economy.
People should look into the past economic nightmares of the Dominican Republic in the 1990s or Iceland
today.

SYSTEMIC RISKS

SYSTEMIC RISKS -

Systemic risks do not only affect Wall Street it also affects Main Street. In fact we are using Main Street to bail out Wall Street. Who allowed Wall Street to become a systemic risk? Who is guarding the guards? The approach in the US has taken measures to correct this; I do not see this in T&T. What if ANSA Mc Cal or Neal and Massey fail what happens.
It was know for quite a long time that CLICO was overexposed.It was almost like a ponzi scheme.

Hindu Credit Union

Hindu Credit Union depositors must get back their money, since the PNM Government has been negligent on the HCU matter and is responsible for depositors’ losses, Opposition Leader Basdeo Panday declared yesterday. Panday made the point while piloting a motion in his name during yesterday’s House of Representatives’ sitting, which a number of HCU depositors attended.Building a case for Government to provide a bailout plan for HCU as it did for CL Financial depositors, Panday said the HCU dilemma was Government’s fault.......(Quote)

What typical Indo leadah rubbish talk! hahahahaha!!!!!!! let them learn when the newly elected PNM gov't took office in 2002 there was an accusation by the then junior minister for finance that something was wrong with HCU, the response was to SURROUND THE PNM PARTY HEAD OFFICE WITH SYCHOPHANTS CUSSING THE PM AND HIS MINISTER TO "LEAVE WE HCU ALONE" "HANDS OFF INDIAN PPL $$$" ETC.

NO INVESTIGATION WAS DONE AND THE REST WAS HISTORY! LET THEM BURN IN THE S..T THEY WANTED.

MikeSamuel - who's your

MikeSamuel - who's your Daddy!

when bas jump on sugar

when bas jump on sugar workers back you can be sure election is in the air; this time UNC internal election.this latest ploy is simply to make up lost ground.imagine the man described the CLF bailout as a hostile takeover in one breath and in another say he want the same thing for HCU.HE say the HCU members had no warning but say two government ministers sounded a warning.it is he and harry who give the HCU members basket to plackard the pnm for saying the hcu in trouble. at that time the cry was RACE. WHY the hcu members aint find out from harry the reason he put out the auditors and refuse the bailout and stop this dottishnes; stop letting bas ride all yuh. one more thing, the members of the hcu look for that and if the unc is bent on rewarding they foolishnes then voters should beware

NAME A POLITICIAN

NAME A POLITICIAN -

Name a politician who does not jump on someones back.

 
 

Feedback