JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, May 29, 2025

Po­lit­i­cal an­a­lysts:

Manning's image takes a beating

by

20100320

Prime Min­is­ter Patrick Man­ning's pop­u­lar­i­ty is def­i­nite­ly dwin­dling, even among his own sup­port base, po­lit­i­cal an­a­lysts have agreed. Man­ning's grow­ing un­pop­u­lar­i­ty stems from a se­ries of re­cent events and his re­ac­tion to them, as well as, the "Row­ley and Kam­la fac­tors," the Sun­day Guardian was told. At least one po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist felt Man­ning was "an­oth­er Pan­day in the mak­ing." Po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist Dr In­di­ra Ram­per­sad not­ed, how­ev­er, that while sup­port for Man­ning is de­clin­ing, it is no in­di­ca­tion of de­clin­ing sup­port for the Peo­ple's Na­tion­al Move­ment. She not­ed that the eth­nic fac­tor al­ways had a ma­jor in­flu­ence on vot­ing pat­terns and she be­lieves it will be no dif­fer­ent in the next gen­er­al elec­tion.

At­tempt­ing to trace the be­gin­ning of Man­ning's un­pop­u­lar­i­ty, Ram­per­sad said, "Usu­al­ly, when gov­ern­ments or regimes are ap­proach­ing their third term, they tend to be­come un­pop­u­lar." She said there are two main rea­sons. "A large part of their own sup­port base want change. "Sec­ond­ly, the gov­ern­ment be­comes so over-con­fi­dent that they start to take their own sup­port base for grant­ed. "This over con­fi­dence al­so con­tributes to ir­ra­tional ac­tions, where the leader feels he could do any­thing and get away with it. "This sense of over con­fi­dence is con­veyed to the pop­u­la­tion."

PM re­spond­ed ir­ra­tional­ly

Ram­per­sad out­lined "some very se­ri­ous is­sues" in which Man­ning re­spond­ed ir­ra­tional­ly.

1. "There's the prophet­ness is­sue. Man­ning re­spond­ed to this in Par­lia­ment by talk­ing about jour­nal­ists who worked on the sto­ry get­ting a spir­i­tu­al ex­pe­ri­ence like they nev­er had be­fore."

2. Ram­per­sad said de­spite pub­lic ev­i­dence of wrong do­ing, Man­ning con­tin­ues to de­fend for­mer Ude­cott chair­man, Calder Hart.

"Afro-Trinida­di­an busi­ness may see Hart as a White man get­ting all the mon­ey."

3. The al­le­ga­tions by lo­cal artistes that there are mil­lions of dol­lars in flaws in the Na­tion­al Acad­e­my for the Per­form­ing Arts (Na­pa) is an­oth­er is­sue that may have caused sup­port for Man­ning to de­cline. At the open­ing of Na­pa, Man­ning boast­ed about the beau­ty of the build­ing and praised Hart.

4. The "Kam­la fac­tor" can be an­oth­er cause of dwin­dling sup­port for Man­ning, Ram­per­sad said.

"Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar is get­ting a groundswell of sup­port from the UNC base which can spill over in­to the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion if Man­ning's un­pop­u­lar­i­ty con­tin­ues. "And, if the Con­gress of the Peo­ple con­tin­ues to not present it­self as a vi­able al­ter­na­tive," she added.

'Woman fac­tor may work against him'

Analysing Per­sad-Bisses­sar's pop­u­lar­i­ty, she said, "Kam­la is car­ry­ing her pol­i­tics in a cer­tain di­rec­tion. "She ex­udes a dif­fer­ent kind of charis­ma to (Bas­deo) Pan­day. She comes across as some­one who cares about the is­sues. She's not in­to pet­ty pol­i­tick­ing. "Not that the eth­nic card will not play in the next gen­er­al elec­tion. I think it will," Ram­per­sad said. She said the "woman fac­tor" may al­so be work­ing against Man­ning. "The fact that she's a woman is dif­fer­ent and she may be per­ceived as more com­pas­sion­ate and hu­mane than a male leader." Ram­per­sad said she hopes that Per­sad-Bisses­sar would not "rule like a man" if she as­sumes pow­er and be­come like "The Iron La­dy," for­mer British prime min­is­ter, Mar­garet Thatch­er.

Ram­per­sad said all of these things could im­pact on the im­pend­ing lo­cal gov­ern­ment elec­tions lat­er this year. "I will be cau­tious to make pre­dic­tions about the gen­er­al elec­tions. Our elec­torate has a short mem­o­ry and in three years, all could be for­got­ten. "Pol­i­tics car­ry a ra­tio­nale of its own," she said. Ram­per­sad said Man­ning is not an­oth­er Pan­day in the mak­ing be­cause the cir­cum­stances that led to Pan­day's un­pop­u­lar­i­ty were dif­fer­ent. She said Pan­day's age and the fact that he lost two gen­er­al elec­tions led his sup­port­ers to think he was un­able to move them from Op­po­si­tion.

Grow­ing un­pop­u­lar­i­ty

Po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist Dr Bish­nu Ra­goonath says Man­ning's grow­ing un­pop­u­lar­i­ty is forc­ing him to do a lot of dam­age con­trol. The PM's dam­age con­trol meth­ods, un­for­tu­nate­ly, seem to be work­ing against him, Ra­goonath said. Giv­ing a good ex­am­ple, he re­called the re­cent "war" that Man­ning de­clared with lo­cal con­trac­tors. Man­ning, soon af­ter, said he was not en­gaged in any war with any group in T&T. "Yes, his pop­u­lar­i­ty is def­i­nite­ly dwin­dling," Ra­goonath said. "Even among his own sup­port­ers to some ex­tent." He agreed with Ram­per­sad, how­ev­er, that this does not mean that peo­ple will not vote for the PNM. "Man­ning is the is­sue, not the PNM," he said.

The par­ty has time on its side

While Ra­goonath be­lieves that Man­ning and Pan­day "are cut from the same po­lit­i­cal cloth," he does not be­lieve Man­ning will nec­es­sar­i­ly suf­fer the same fate as Pan­day, who was hu­mil­i­at­ing­ly boot­ed out of the lead­er­ship post by his sup­port­ers. "Man­ning and Pan­day's po­lit­i­cal teacher was Dr Er­ic Williams, who was a max­i­mum leader. "Man­ning has to lose an elec­tion be­fore he is boot­ed out. The PNM has its own in­ter­nal dy­nam­ics in which the par­ty will sup­port the leader, par­tic­u­lar­ly when he is the PM, no mat­ter what." Ra­goonath ob­served that T&T is on­ly now mov­ing to de­mand change but "is not yet there." Can Man­ning re­deem him­self? "One thing the PNM has go­ing for them is a lot of time. "The next gen­er­al elec­tion is in 2012 and may even go to 2013," Ra­goonath not­ed.

At a walk­a­bout in San Juan last Mon­day, an 81-year old re­tiree blocked Man­ning from en­ter­ing his yard.

He al­so blocked Man­ning from greet­ing oth­er mem­bers of his fam­i­ly. He said had been a loy­al PNM sup­port­er up to the last elec­tion but was now in favour of change.

He com­plained about the Ude­cott is­sue. Rev Court­ney Joseph, an­oth­er res­i­dent, said he was em­barassed about the Ude­cott sit­u­a­tion.

Man­ning was al­so greet­ed warm­ly by many dur­ing the walk­a­bout.

For­mer Op­po­si­tion Leader, Bas­deo Pan­day, was al­so heck­led and cussed dur­ing the Jan­u­ary 24 Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress in­ter­nal elec­tions in Chan­danagore in his own con­stituen­cy of Cou­va North.

Pan­day, in a his­to­ry-mak­ing move, was re­placed by Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar in the elec­tions.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored