JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, April 6, 2025

?Talks to­day on UNC/COP uni­ty...

Dookeran: We have no choice, but to agree

by

20100411

There is no oth­er op­tion, but for the Con­gress of the Peo­ple (COP) and the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC) to unite forces to stand against the Peo­ple's Na­tion­al Move­ment (PNM) in the up­com­ing gen­er­al elec­tion, says COP po­lit­i­cal leader Win­ston Dook­er­an. Dook­er­an made the state­ment while ad­dress­ing the me­dia sub­se­quent to the par­ty's Na­tion­al Coun­cil meet­ing at its Op­er­a­tions Cen­tre, Char­lieville, yes­ter­day. "There is no op­tion...we have to agree," he said. "The na­tion re­quires us to come to­geth­er in or­der to pro­vide that op­tion...and what­ev­er ob­sta­cles are in the way, and what­ev­er hur­dles we have to over­come, I am pre­pared to work to make it hap­pen." Dook­er­an was re­spond­ing to the ques­tion that if the uni­ty talks be­tween the UNC and COP failed, what was his next step?

Dook­er­an is sched­uled to meet with UNC po­lit­i­cal leader Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar to­day. He said the pur­pose of the meet­ing was to deep­en the talks on uni­ty and de­cide a way for­ward. Af­ter these talks, he added that they would have de­tailed di­a­logue on po­lit­i­cal is­sues con­cern­ing seat al­lo­ca­tion, a com­mon pol­i­cy po­si­tion and a joint cam­paign strat­e­gy ap­proach. Ques­tioned whether the uni­ty talks were mov­ing in a par­al­lel di­rec­tion, Dook­er­an said: "This was an is­sue that has been raised but we are seek­ing to ad­dress that. "Time is not on our side...we have to fast track and de­vel­op our pro­pos­als be­cause of the snap elec­tion," he said. "It is with our hope and ex­pec­ta­tion, how­ev­er, that we would come to a com­mon un­der­stand­ing on these is­sues as we pre­pare for the po­lit­i­cal bat­tle be­fore us."

Asked if he was con­cerned about Per­sad-Bisses­sar's dri­ve to be­come the next Prime Min­is­ter, Dook­er­an said: "Giv­en the enor­mi­ty of the sit­u­a­tion, no ob­sta­cles must be put in the way and no hur­dles that we can­not over­come in the process of find­ing the right per­son." While the PNM was more than halfway through their screen­ing process and the UNC would be­gin to­mor­row, Dook­er­an said COP's screen­ing of can­di­dates would be­gin lat­er this week, but he hoped to come to a "com­mon pro­ce­dure with all par­ties." Asked how he felt about los­ing an­oth­er mem­ber–De­vant Maraj to UNC on Fri­day– he said: "It re­al­ly does not mat­ter, be­cause in the end we are com­ing with a com­mon front, com­mon can­di­dates and a com­mon op­tion...each in­di­vid­ual would po­si­tion where he/she is best..."

Asked what he thinks about Man­ning com­ment­ing that he was on his way out, Dook­er­an said: "I have to hes­i­tate to an­swer be­cause I am not sure whether the head­line was cor­rect, but if he is not on his way out, we'll try to help him to get out," to the sounds of loud cheers and laugh­ter. He added that Man­ning's call for a snap elec­tion was an at­tempt to un­lock democ­ra­cy, but "peo­ple would have to get locked up in the process."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored