JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, April 10, 2025

Anti-PNM song puts Preacher in hot water

by

20100414

En­ter­tain­er Bar­nett Hen­ry (Preach­er) has found him­self in the mid­dle of a po­lit­i­cal con­tro­ver­sy over some an­ti-PNM lyrics he penned for the Op­po­si­tion UNC. Preach­er, best re­mem­bered for his com­po­si­tion–Patrick We Step­ping Up With You–which be­came the PNM's an­them in the 2007 gen­er­al elec­tions, has changed his tune for 2010. The Point Fortin bard, who per­formed his hit on the PNM plat­form and was in ne­go­ti­a­tions to do so again, is now singing Get Rid of the PNM.

The grav­i­ty of the sit­u­a­tion came to a boil yes­ter­day morn­ing when a de­mo ver­sion of the song, vo­calised by him, was played on Ra­dio I95.5. The Morn­ing Show hosts, Tony Lee and Dale Enoch, were dis­cussing the de­ci­sion of ca­lyp­son­ian Crazy (Ed­win Ay­oung) to per­form Patrick Has to Go on a UNC plat­form. Crazy de­nied he was a sup­port­er of the UNC, ex­plain­ing he did it just for the mon­ey. Reached by tele­phone in the Unit­ed States, Preach­er said he was very an­gry.

He told the Guardian it was just an un­fin­ished de­mo ver­sion, not a record­ing and he au­tho­rised no one to use it. He said no fi­nan­cial agree­ment was reached to buy the song or for its dis­tri­b­u­tion. "The bot­tom line is that no busi­ness deal was made for that song. I don't know how that song reached the ra­dio and I am speak­ing with my lawyers to en­sure it is not played again," Preach­er said. The song ad­vo­cates get­ting rid of the PNM, point­ing out that it made promis­es, which it did not keep, just to get their votes. It al­so is crit­i­cal of Prime Min­is­ter Patrick Man­ning im­port­ing a large num­ber of Chi­nese work­ers while equal­ly skilled lo­cals are out of jobs.

Preach­er ex­plained that sev­er­al months ago he was ap­proached by the UNC (he did not name the per­son who made the ap­proach) to pen a song for them and that was what he did. He said: "I did a de­mo and sent it to them (UNC). I heard noth­ing again from them and there was no fi­nan­cial trans­ac­tions fol­low­ing. "I thought that was the end of that un­til this morn­ing when peo­ple heard it and start­ed to re­act. I got calls from peo­ple telling me I was singing for the UNC to get rid of the PNM." Even though he per­formed on the PNM's plat­form, Preach­er de­nied he was a mem­ber of that par­ty. He said: "I am not a PNM. I not for no par­ty. My work is singing and com­pos­ing. If some­body come to me and say to com­pose a song for them, I will do it.

"If next year an­oth­er par­ty come and say the same thing, I will do it. That is my work." Preach­er's man­ag­er Charles "Char­lo" Olivi­er, in a tele­phone in­ter­view, said Preach­er had no in­ten­tion of vo­cal­is­ing the song for the UNC. He said Preach­er al­so wrote a song for the PNM's 2010 po­lit­i­cal cam­paign and was ex­pect­ing to be hired again to per­form "We Vot­ing PNM" on their plat­form this time around. He said the tune was sent back to them to be mod­i­fied. Char­lo said the fact the tune was played and Preach­er was iden­ti­fied as the com­pos­er and singer could have se­ri­ous im­pli­ca­tions for him as an en­ter­tain­er. "This is how he lives. He has no oth­er job," Char­lo stat­ed. "Who­ev­er leaked that to the ra­dio sta­tion had in­ten­tions to dis­cred­it him," Char­lo charged.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored