JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, June 15, 2025

Face-to-Face

TOP ready to take Tobago

by

20100417

?Ash­worth Jack, po­lit­i­cal leader of the two-year-old To­ba­go Or­gan­i­sa­tion of the Peo­ple (TOP), has been thrust in­to the na­tion­al po­lit­i­cal main­stream through an elec­toral al­liance with Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress. Jack, Mi­nor­i­ty Leader in the To­ba­go House of As­sem­bly, dis­cussed elec­tion is­sues with the Sun­day Guardian.

?Q: How pre­pared is TOP for the gen­er­al elec­tion?

A: We are as pre­pared as any po­lit­i­cal par­ty and bet­ter than most. We nev­er stopped or­gan­is­ing since the 2009 THA elec­tion, so we were not caught un­awares.

Could you in­di­cate your prospec­tive can­di­dates?

We have four nom­i­nees, and they will come down to two on Mon­day. For To­ba­go East, they are pathol­o­gist Dr Hughvon de Vi­gnes and Dr Vanil­la Al­leyne-Top­pin. The nom­i­nees for To­ba­go West are Dr Theodill McPher­son and Dr Them­nold Bak­er. We will de­cide on the can­di­dates on Mon­day.

What does TOP of­fer dif­fer­ent­ly from PNM?

Every­thing. We be­lieve in a To­ba­go that can make de­ci­sions in To­ba­go for To­ba­go. We be­lieve there must be hon­esty in gov­ern­ment, in term lim­its for lead­ers, both the Prime Min­is­ter and THA Chief Sec­re­tary. We be­lieve de­ci­sions should be made af­ter con­sul­ta­tions with the peo­ple. De­ci­sions must not be forced down peo­ple's throats.

Are you ful­ly pleased with the re­la­tion­ship with UNC?

We have been work­ing for some time on re­la­tions with UNC and COP. We were talk­ing with COP just as much as UNC. Both Win­ston Dook­er­an and Prakash Ra­mad­har have been speak­ing with us for quite a while. I have at­tend­ed a num­ber of foun­da­tion for good gov­er­nance work­shops and spoke at them. I have been work­ing with oth­er re­lat­ed or­gan­i­sa­tions. We met last week with UNC, and I am hap­py at the com­mit­ments to good gov­er­nance. I am see­ing a gen­uine at­tempt to cre­ate change. We agreed that if we do not see eye to eye, we would talk and try to find a so­lu­tion.

Have there been any neg­a­tive re­spons­es to your ac­cord?

Of course, we have had. Ini­tial­ly, some PNM sup­port­ers were say­ing we sold out To­ba­go to the In­di­ans. I find that to be in­ter­est­ing. The PNM is talk­ing about Vi­sion 2020, about build­ing a de­vel­oped coun­try, and they are try­ing to di­vide it by race and by re­gion. But we will work with peo­ple of like mind to save the coun­try from that kind of thing.

If there is elec­toral vic­to­ry, is TOP like­ly to play a vi­tal role in gov­er­nance?

We will not have it any oth­er way. If we are part­ners, we must re­spect that. It is not some­thing the UNC has ob­ject­ed to, or the COP, for that mat­ter.

What are the crit­i­cal is­sues fac­ing To­ba­go?

Con­sti­tu­tion­al re­form is a ma­jor is­sue. We can't make de­ci­sions on mat­ters af­fect­ing To­ba­go. There are 41 Mem­bers of Par­lia­ment and 31 sen­a­tors, mean­ing that there are 72 mem­bers of both Hous­es. But there are no sen­a­tors who, as of right, must be ap­point­ed from To­ba­go. De­ci­sions that af­fect To­bag­o­ni­ans are be­ing made by peo­ple who prob­a­bly can­not find To­ba­go.

If the sit­u­a­tion were re­versed, would Trinidad be hap­py that of 72 mem­bers of both Hous­es of Par­lia­ment, on­ly two must, of right, be from Trinidad?

We of To­ba­go aren't. We must be able to make more de­ci­sions about To­ba­go. Look at the sit­u­a­tion with re­spect to Town and Coun­try Plan­ning Unit; to build a home, you must get ap­proval from Port-of-Spain. Some peo­ple don't know where to find the of­fice. Would Trinidad be hap­py with that? Sure­ly not. The sit­u­a­tion is the same with re­spect to land trans­ac­tions. Pen­sions are cal­cu­lat­ed in Port-of-Spain. You have to go to Port-of-Spain to han­dle tax mat­ters. There are oth­er ex­am­ples. Who could be com­fort­able with that?

Is the with­draw­al of Ren­nie Du­mas' PNM can­di­da­cy good or bad news for TOP?

It does not mat­ter ei­ther way. What has been his lev­el of rep­re­sen­ta­tion? I don't know how much he has rep­re­sent­ed the peo­ple of To­ba­go East. I looked at his con­tri­bu­tions in Par­lia­ment, and he has not rep­re­sent­ed the peo­ple ef­fec­tive­ly. He has not spo­ken well. There are a num­ber of pieces of leg­is­la­tion he should have ob­ject­ed to, such as the Town and Coun­try, Rev­enue Au­thor­i­ty and oth­ers, that would af­fect To­ba­go in a neg­a­tive way.

Do you call that rep­re­sen­ta­tion?

Are you op­ti­mistic about the im­me­di­ate fu­ture?

Very! From the found­ing con­ven­tion of TOP on Sep­tem­ber 26, 2008, we have con­tin­ued to build and de­vel­op, so that we got 48 per cent sup­port in the THA elec­tion of Jan­u­ary 19, 2009. We moved from one to four seats. We lost three seats by mar­gins of 58, 78 and 195 votes. We have not stopped work­ing. We will con­tin­ue to build our or­gan­i­sa­tion. We are con­fi­dent of vic­to­ry; very con­fi­dent!

What are your own per­son­al po­lit­i­cal am­bi­tions?

To be the leader of TOP and to as­pire to be­come Chief Sec­re­tary of To­ba­go House of As­sem­bly. But I want to lead a strong or­gan­i­sa­tion that would help to change the coun­try. That's more im­por­tant than any po­si­tion I can hold. I be­lieve in the ?prin­ci­ples of hon­esty and fair play. That's what I want. If out of that comes the po­si­tion of Chief Sec­re­tary, then that's fine.

Would you be cam­paign­ing in Trinidad?

I was on the UNC plat­form at Mara­bel­la. It was won­der­ful. I may be there on oth­er plat­forms. But I have a cam­paign to run and an elec­tion to win in To­ba­go.

What do you want to say to the To­ba­go elec­torate?

This is an elec­tion in which the elec­torate must be smart. They have to ask them­selves whether they have been prop­er­ly gov­erned over the past two-and-a-half years. If not, why not? I ap­peal to the elec­torate to let good sense pre­vail. Their fu­ture is at stake.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored