JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, May 2, 2025

Manning comes out fighting

by

20101119

Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar is con­struct­ing a mul­ti-mil­lion-dol­lar pri­vate res­i­dence in south Trinidad. This is ac­cord­ing to for­mer prime min­is­ter Patrick Man­ning, who made the rev­e­la­tion in Par­lia­ment yes­ter­day, dur­ing his maid­en con­tri­bu­tion in this ses­sion of Par­lia­ment. He said the build­ing was be­ing con­struct­ed at a cost of some $150 mil­lion. Man­ning was con­tribut­ing to de­bate on the In­ter­cep­tion of Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Bill 2010. The bill was pre­sent­ed by Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter Brigadier John Sandy to le­galise the tap­ping of phones by the Se­cu­ri­ty In­tel­li­gence Agency. Man­ning dis­played elab­o­rate pic­tures of the PM's pri­vate res­i­dence now be­ing con­struct­ed.

He said Per­sad-Bisses­sar's pri­vate res­i­dence was big­ger than the Prime Min­is­ter's res­i­dence and the Diplo­mat­ic Cen­tre in St Ann's. He called on the PM to bring to Par­lia­ment, the re­quired ap­provals for the con­struc­tion. He al­so called on Per­sad-Bisses­sar to in­vite the me­dia to the res­i­dence. Per­sad-Bisses­sar at one point got and claimed that Man­ning was "mis­lead­ing the House." But Man­ning per­sist­ed. Man­ning said be­fore the May 24 gen­er­al elec­tions she was strug­gling to con­struct the house, but much work had tak­en place sub­se­quent­ly. Dur­ing his con­tri­bu­tion House Speak­er Wade Mark was forced to call on Man­ning to re­frain from im­put­ing im­prop­er mo­tives against gov­ern­ment min­is­ters. Man­ning heed­ed the re­quest, claim­ing it was be­ing done un­der duress. He was crit­i­cal of the in­tent of the leg­is­la­tion. He quot­ed sev­er­al doc­u­ments which claim that there was need for agen­cies like the SIA to main­tain their se­cre­cy if they were to be suc­cess­ful.

Man­ning ac­cused the PP Gov­ern­ment of mov­ing sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly to dis­man­tle the crime-fight­ing agen­cies which were set up to deal with drug traf­fick­ing and oth­er se­ri­ous crime. He said the PP Gov­ern­ment re­moved the head of the Of­fice of Dis­as­ter Pre­pared­ness and Man­age­ment, di­rec­tor of the Spe­cial An­ti-Crime Unit of T&T, and the Po­lice Com­mis­sion­er, two weeks be­fore his act­ing ap­point­ment was due to end. Man­ning said the bill in its present form would "not on­ly blind and cause to be deaf our in­tel­li­gence agen­cies, but will se­ri­ous­ly un­der­mine the se­cu­ri­ty of the State. "And when in the fu­ture–and it won't be long again–we be­gin to see the rise in crime and the re­turn of things like kid­nap­pings and so on, un­der­stand that the rea­son for that has to be placed en­tire­ly at the doorstep of ho­n­ourable mem­bers op­po­site," he said. Man­ning al­so raised the is­sue of the abort­ed con­struc­tion of a church on the Heights of Gu­napo. The church was re­port­ed­ly be­ing con­struct­ed by Rev­erend Ju­liana Pe­na.

He in­sist­ed that no state funds were used to con­struct the church. "And no how they in­ves­ti­gate, they could nev­er prove that...It just has not hap­pened," he in­sist­ed. Man­ning said he was blam­ing three peo­ple for the de­struc­tion of the church–Works and Trans­port Min­is­ter Jack Warn­er, Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar and At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Anand Ram­lo­gan. "I want to tell then one thing...That is God's church, not mine," he said. "And there­fore the bat­tle in­volv­ing that church is not my bat­tle, it is God's bat­tle. Let us see how the bat­tle will go from here on." Man­ning said the bill in the cur­rent form was "to­tal­ly un­ac­cept­able to us." He added that the Op­po­si­tion was, how­ev­er, pre­pared to give its sup­port to the Gov­ern­ment "on any­thing that it con­sid­ers rea­son­able and ac­cept­able."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored