JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Probing body claims cover up in Smith case

by

Curtis Williams, Lead Editor - Business
2015 days ago
20191030
Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley and Darryl Smith

Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley and Darryl Smith

Abraham-Diaz

Cov­er up! That is one of the ma­jor find­ings of the re­port of a com­mit­tee set up by Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley to in­ves­ti­gate the cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing the dis­missal and pay­ment of $150,000 to a for­mer em­ploy­ee of the Min­istry of Sport and Youth Af­fairs, af­ter she al­leged that she was sex­u­al­ly ha­rassed by the for­mer min­is­ter Dar­ryl Smith.

A let­ter sent to Smith by the Per­ma­nent Sec­re­tary to the Prime Min­is­ter, Mau­rice Suite, re­vealed some of the find­ings of the com­mit­tee, which con­clud­ed that from the very be­gin­ning there was an at­tempt by sev­er­al peo­ple in the Min­istry of Sport to cov­er up the al­le­ga­tions made by Car­rie-Ann More­au.

The let­ter, dat­ed Au­gust 10, 2018 and which Guardian Me­di­an has a copy of, read: “The man­ner in which we found the MSYA treat­ed with this mater sug­gests that from be­gin­ning to end there was a con­cert­ed ef­fort to cov­er up the al­le­ga­tion of sex­u­al ha­rass­ment which Miss More­au had made against the for­mer Min­is­ter. Miss More­au’s com­plaint was pri­ma fa­cie cred­i­ble and she cer­tain­ly de­served for it to be tak­en se­ri­ous­ly.”

Prime Min­is­ter Row­ley has re­fused to make pub­lic the find­ings of the com­mit­tee be­cause ac­cord­ing to him, they do not con­tain a re­sponse from Smith to the al­le­ga­tions.

The three-mem­ber com­mit­tee which con­duct­ed the probe was chaired by Jacque­line Wil­son and in­clud­ed Fo­lade Mu­to­ta and Elaine B Green and found that More­au was not the on­ly per­son who had raised sex­u­al al­le­ga­tions against Smith, while there were oth­er in­ci­dents that were con­sid­ered con­sen­su­al.

The com­mit­tee al­so found that there ap­peared to be a con­cert­ed ef­fort to sani­tise the fir­ing ex­er­cise of any ref­er­ence to the al­le­ga­tions of sex­u­al ha­rass­ment and to treat it as an or­tho­dox claim of un­fair dis­missal. It not­ed, how­ev­er, that Miss More­au was in fact mak­ing two com­plaints. The com­mit­tee found that she was com­plain­ing that she had been sex­u­al­ly ha­rassed by the for­mer min­is­ter and that her re­port­ing of that com­plaint was the rea­son for her dis­missal.

The com­mit­tee said it had formed the opin­ion that the main goal of the MYSA when More­au made her com­plaint was to avoid the sub­stance of More­au’s claims, “dis­guise the true na­ture of the dis­pute” and to cov­er up the sex­u­al ha­rass­ment claim un­der the guise that a trade dis­pute was at the heart of the mat­ter. The com­mit­tee al­so said there was an at­tempt to en­sure the mat­ter was con­tained with­in the MSYA and any po­ten­tial dam­age to the for­mer min­is­ter was min­imised via the use of a non-dis­clo­sure agree­ment.

More­au had al­leged sex­u­al ha­rass­ment as the rea­son for her dis­missal as Smith’s per­son­al as­sis­tant and the mat­ter was even­tu­al­ly set­tled with a non-dis­clo­sure clause at­tached to the set­tle­ment.

Smith was sub­se­quent­ly fired as Min­is­ter of Sport.

In an in­ter­view on I95FM ear­li­er this month, PM Row­ley was asked about why he had not yet made the re­port in­to the mat­ter pub­lic de­spite sev­er­al calls for him to do so from, var­i­ous sec­tors of the so­ci­ety, among them Fix­in’ T&T. In re­sponse, Row­ley said he could not pub­licly re­veal the con­tents of the re­ports be­cause it “... came to a con­clu­sion neg­a­tive­ly about Mr Smith with­out talk­ing to him.” Row­ley said Smith’s lawyers had com­plained of the process in­volved and threat­ened to take ac­tion if the re­port were made pub­lic. How­ev­er, he said ac­tion had been tak­en against the min­is­ter al­though he did not in­di­cate what the ex­act na­ture of that ac­tion was.

Fix­in’ T&T head Kirk Waite had filed a Free­dom of In­for­ma­tion Act re­quest for de­tails of the re­port. How­ev­er, his re­quest was de­nied by the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter which in­di­cat­ed that “Se­nior Coun­sel has ad­vised that these re­quests as for­mu­lat­ed, do not com­ply with the Free­dom of In­for­ma­tion Act.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored