JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, March 1, 2025

Rich countries getting new COVID vaccine before poorer ones

by

1073 days ago
20220324
FILE - A worker moves boxes carrying Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine at SK Bioscience Co. in Andong, South Korea, on Feb. 9, 2022. Before the pandemic, Novavax was a small American company that had never brought any vaccine to market. Its shots have proven highly effective, but it is relying heavily on other companies to make them. (Kim Hyun-tae/Yonhap via AP, File)

FILE - A worker moves boxes carrying Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine at SK Bioscience Co. in Andong, South Korea, on Feb. 9, 2022. Before the pandemic, Novavax was a small American company that had never brought any vaccine to market. Its shots have proven highly effective, but it is relying heavily on other companies to make them. (Kim Hyun-tae/Yonhap via AP, File)

By MARIA CHENG and ANIRUD­DHA GHOS­AL-As­so­ci­at­ed Press

 

NEW DEL­HI (AP) — The com­pa­ny be­hind a COVID-19 vac­cine tout­ed as a key tool for the de­vel­op­ing world has sent tens of mil­lions of dos­es to wealthy na­tions but pro­vid­ed none yet to the U.N.-backed ef­fort to sup­ply poor­er coun­tries, a sign that in­equity per­sists in the glob­al re­sponse to the pan­dem­ic.

CO­V­AX had planned to make avail­able 250 mil­lion dos­es from No­vavax by March, but the U.N. agency in charge of de­liv­er­ies says the first ship­ments now like­ly won’t be made un­til April or May.

It wasn’t sup­posed to be this way. CEPI, one of the or­ga­ni­za­tions lead­ing CO­V­AX, gave No­vavax $388 mil­lion to fast-track the vac­cine’s de­vel­op­ment, aimed at mak­ing the shot avail­able in poor­er coun­tries as the pan­dem­ic was ex­plod­ing two years ago.

The in­vest­ment guar­an­teed CO­V­AX the “right of first re­fusal” to the first No­vavax dos­es, but the deal ap­plied on­ly to fac­to­ries in the Czech Re­pub­lic, South Ko­rea and Spain, said CEPI spokesman Bjorg Dystvold Nils­son.

There are oth­er fac­to­ries that aren’t part of the deal — and their shots are go­ing else­where.

The Serum In­sti­tute of In­dia, the world’s largest vac­cine mak­er, has man­u­fac­tured mil­lions of No­vavax dos­es. Ac­cord­ing to In­dia’s Min­istry of Ex­ter­nal Af­fairs and the in­sti­tute, more than 28.9 mil­lion of those dos­es were sent to the Nether­lands in Jan­u­ary and Feb­ru­ary, while Aus­tralia re­ceived about 6 mil­lion dos­es. In­done­sia al­so re­ceived about 9 mil­lion dos­es in De­cem­ber.

Thou­sands of oth­er No­vavax dos­es were al­so shipped from a Nether­lands fac­to­ry to oth­er EU coun­tries.

“What­ev­er the rea­son, a vac­cine that was be­lieved to be high­ly suit­able for poor coun­tries is now in large part go­ing to rich coun­tries,” said Zain Rizvi, a drug pol­i­cy ex­pert at the U.S. ad­vo­ca­cy group Pub­lic Cit­i­zen. “It’s trag­ic that in year three of the pan­dem­ic, we still can­not get the re­sources, at­ten­tion and po­lit­i­cal will to solve vac­cine in­equity.”

The de­lay is the lat­est set­back for CO­V­AX, which has been re­peat­ed­ly hit by sup­ply prob­lems and has missed nu­mer­ous tar­gets to share dos­es.

Last year, WHO’s di­rec­tor-gen­er­al Tedros Ad­hanom Ghe­breye­sus de­cried the chasm in vac­cine sup­plies be­tween rich and poor coun­tries as a “cat­a­stroph­ic moral fail­ure.”

Vac­cine avail­abil­i­ty has been im­prov­ing in poor­er re­gions re­cent­ly, but lo­gis­ti­cal prob­lems per­sist.

Ac­cord­ing to da­ta from Ox­ford Uni­ver­si­ty, on­ly about 14% of peo­ple in low-in­come coun­tries have re­ceived at least one dose of COVID-19 vac­cine. More than 680 mil­lion dos­es of CO­V­AX-pro­vid­ed vac­cines re­main un­used or have ex­pired, ac­cord­ing to gov­ern­ment da­ta.

Even with vac­cine sup­plies im­prov­ing, some of­fi­cials were ea­ger­ly await­ing the No­vavax vac­cine in par­tic­u­lar be­cause it is eas­i­er to trans­port and store than some oth­er coro­n­avirus shots. They al­so hoped it might be more en­tic­ing to peo­ple skep­ti­cal of the As­traZeneca vac­cine, which suf­fered through a botched roll­out in Eu­rope.

Coun­tries in­clud­ing Zim­bab­we, the Cen­tral African Re­pub­lic and Kiri­bati were among those in line to be of­fered No­vavax dos­es by March from CO­V­AX.

Be­fore the pan­dem­ic, No­vavax was a small Amer­i­can com­pa­ny that had nev­er brought any vac­cine to mar­ket. Its shots have proven high­ly ef­fec­tive, but it is re­ly­ing heav­i­ly on oth­er com­pa­nies to make them.

The com­pa­ny, strug­gling to scale up pro­duc­tion, al­so has de­layed de­liv­ery to oth­er coun­tries, in­clud­ing some in the Eu­ro­pean Union. CO­V­AX is sup­posed to re­ceive more than 1 bil­lion No­vavax dos­es.

In a state­ment, the Gaithers­burg, Mary­land, com­pa­ny ac­knowl­edged that it had yet to share any shots with the vac­cines al­liance Gavi, which fronts the CO­V­AX ef­fort, but said it stands ready to do so.

“We con­tin­ue to work with Gavi to reach our shared goal of en­sur­ing glob­al ac­cess to our pro­tein-based vac­cine where it is need­ed most,” No­vavax said.

Gavi sug­gest­ed part of the de­lay is that the No­vavax vac­cine wasn’t au­tho­rized by WHO un­til De­cem­ber. Gavi said it planned to al­lo­cate No­vavax in the fu­ture and was “in close touch with the man­u­fac­tur­er and ex­pects the sup­ply to be avail­able for de­liv­ery when coun­tries need it.”

Health of­fi­cials al­so wor­ry that the ur­gency to vac­ci­nate peo­ple every­where against COVID-19 has dis­ap­peared — es­pe­cial­ly as many coun­tries roll back pre­cau­tions and the world’s at­ten­tion is di­vert­ed.

“Rich coun­tries have moved on from COVID and every­one is fix­at­ed on the war in Ukraine, but COVID-19 re­mains an acute cri­sis for most peo­ple in the world,” said Ritu Shar­ma, a vice-pres­i­dent at the char­i­ty CARE.

She said CO­V­AX was still des­per­ate­ly short of vac­cines and that based on the cur­rent pace of vac­ci­na­tion, the world was still “years and years” away from im­mu­niz­ing enough peo­ple to stop fu­ture COVID-19 waves.

Oth­er ex­perts said it was in­cum­bent on pub­lic health agen­cies to en­sure their in­vest­ments in­to vac­cines would ben­e­fit poor coun­tries and to be more trans­par­ent about what went wrong.

“What­ev­er the ex­pla­na­tion is, it’s un­sat­is­fac­to­ry,” said Brook Bak­er, an ac­cess to med­i­cines spe­cial­ist at North­east­ern Uni­ver­si­ty. “The bot­tom line is that there are still a lot of un­vac­ci­nat­ed peo­ple in poor coun­tries and once again, they are at the back of the line.”

 

 

COVID-19Vaccination


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored